WOW! BBC Published THIS?

[Annie]

Of course the criticism is on their news coverage, particularly the ME and not critiques so 'entertainment' might not be the correct venue? Then again, we are speaking of BBC, so maybe they DO know better?



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4964702.stm

BBC 'must improve Mid-East view'
The BBC fails to always give a "full and fair account" of the Israeli Palestinian conflict but is not deliberately biased, a report has said.

The BBC governors asked an independent panel to scrutinise its output.

Its report said the BBC was committed to being fair, accurate and impartial and UK viewers regarded it as unbiased.

But coverage was not consistently full and fair and "in important respects, presents an incomplete and in that sense misleading picture", it found.

It could and should do better to meet the gold standard which it sets itself
Sir Quentin Thomas
Panel chairman
The panel, chaired by British Board of Film Classification president Sir Quentin Thomas, examined only the corporation's UK domestic public service output.

Sir Quentin said: "What the BBC does now is good for the most part - some of it very good.

"But it could and should do better to meet the gold standard which it sets itself in its best programmes."

The report said: "Apart from individual lapses, sometimes of tone, language or attitude, there was little to suggest systematic or deliberate bias.

"On the contrary, there was evidence, in the programming and in other ways, of a commitment to be fair, accurate and impartial."

The report also said: "There is high quality reporting from location, some outstanding current affairs programmes and the website provides much valuable historical and other context."

But there were gaps in analysis, context and perspective as well as a failure to consistently uphold editorial standards, it continued.

Broadcast news lacked historical background, stories were often not put in the wider context and there was insufficient analysis and interpretation of important events and issues, the report said.

The range of stories and perspectives was too narrow and reporters' use of language was often inconsistent, it decided.

That included the use of the words "terrorism" and "terrorist". The BBC advises its journalists to avoid the latter because it can be "a barrier to understanding".

But the panel said the BBC should use "terrorism" to describe violence against civilians with the intention of causing terror for ideological objectives, "whether perpetrated by state or non-state agencies".

"It seems clear that placing a bomb on a bus used by civilians intending death or injury in supposed furtherance of a cause is a terrorist act and no other expression conveys so tersely and accurately the elements involved."

'Reassuring'

BBC chairman Michael Grade responded to the report by saying the finding of no deliberate or systematic bias was "reassuring".

"The panel found much to praise, but it also identified some shortcomings in the BBC's coverage," he said.

"We have asked BBC management to consider the panel's recommendations and respond to us at our June board meeting."

He added the corporation must continually demonstrate its efforts to meet the highest editorial standards because impartiality was the most important safeguard of the BBC's editorial independence.

We have the right editorial structures and processes in place to provide high quality, impartial journalism
BBC News management
A statement from BBC News management pointed to "recent developments to strengthen performance" such as the appointment of Jeremy Bowen as Middle East editor and a major training programme.

"We are pleased the panel commends the quality and authority of our reporting from the Jerusalem bureau," it said.

"We agree there is more we can do to provide greater context and understanding for audiences on the conflict.

"We are confident we have the right editorial structures and processes in place to provide high quality, impartial journalism and to ensure we continue to make progress in developing the authority and comprehensiveness of our output."

"Their contribution will assist the BBC in providing the best possible news coverage for licence fee payers."

BBC executives will now prepare a plan for the governors detailing how they intend to implement "appropriate recommendations".

 

[Diuretic]

Good for them. They're an influential organisation that needs to maintain its reputation for objectivity so feedback from independent sources is a great idea. At least they don't toady to the government - I bet Tony Blair hates their guts.