Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I understand the Taliban hate Jews, too. What makes your attitude towards Jews any better than the Taliban's?No you don't. If he'd said the moon was made of cheese, would you consider it as potential truth?
Same thing.
Ah, you dislike something so you make fun of it rather than explore the possibility of truth.
I understand theTaliban are anti education; what makes your attitude to investigation and learning better than theirs?
You go ahead. I'll continue to point and laugh at every retard who screeches "JOOOOOOS!!"Every idea from a credible source deserves investigation and this guy is such a source.
It may well be total rubbish but his qualifications and background suggest it's worth a look to see if it holds water.
So might this.
The last name was familiar as a contributor to the internet tabloid "prison planet" so I did some digging.
Adam Holland: Alan Sabrosky: "Large majority of U.S. Jews are traitors" and Israel did 9/11 attacks. So who the heck is Alan Sabrosky?
Alan Sabrosky: "Large majority of U.S. Jews are traitors" and Israel did 9/11 attacks. So who the heck is Alan Sabrosky?
Sometimes, when an expert makes a serious charge but has no evidence to back it up, it's still newsworthy by dint of the provenance of the charge. The reputation of a source can play a big role in determining when to believe unverifiable charges, or at least report them with a grain of salt.
Alan Sabrosky bills himself as the former Director of Studies at the U.S. Army War College. He has made quite a name for himself in recent months by first declaring himself a military expert with high-level connections in the U.S. military hierarchy, then by outrageously claiming that Israel was responsible for 9/11 and that the U.S. military knows this and is concealing it. While he offers no evidence for this, he claims that he should be trusted because of his expertise. The truth of the matter -- with respect to both his background and his claims -- is quite different, of course. Sabrosky has deliberately inflated his role in the military and has used that ruse to promote a hateful, fact-free conspiracy theory. In fact, while he did work as an administrator at the U.S. Army War College, he was not, as his job title seems to indicate, the director or dean of the college. Far from it. According to the Press Office of the Army War College, in the mid-1980s, Sabrosky served as a civilian administrator at a research department of the college, supervising the publication of papers written within that department. His job title was "Director of Studies" because he supervised publishing studies done within a department of the college. He was a mid-level civilian manager at a military college, without access to the sort of highly classified material of the sort he now fraudulently claims to have. Moreover, since his employment at that school was about 25 years ago, his employment there would provide him with no special insights with respect to 9/11. How on earth could someone who worked on the level of a college librarian in the 1980s be privy to top secret information revealing a vast hidden conspiracy? And how on earth could he be the only person to know about it or think it worth revealing?
Imagine that -- an irrational Jew-hater lying.
So, Fred, still think this guy's bullshit is worth serious consideration?
Careful, now -- your answer may reveal volumes about you.
So might this.
The last name was familiar as a contributor to the internet tabloid "prison planet" so I did some digging.
Adam Holland: Alan Sabrosky: "Large majority of U.S. Jews are traitors" and Israel did 9/11 attacks. So who the heck is Alan Sabrosky?
Alan Sabrosky: "Large majority of U.S. Jews are traitors" and Israel did 9/11 attacks. So who the heck is Alan Sabrosky?
Sometimes, when an expert makes a serious charge but has no evidence to back it up, it's still newsworthy by dint of the provenance of the charge. The reputation of a source can play a big role in determining when to believe unverifiable charges, or at least report them with a grain of salt.
Alan Sabrosky bills himself as the former Director of Studies at the U.S. Army War College. He has made quite a name for himself in recent months by first declaring himself a military expert with high-level connections in the U.S. military hierarchy, then by outrageously claiming that Israel was responsible for 9/11 and that the U.S. military knows this and is concealing it. While he offers no evidence for this, he claims that he should be trusted because of his expertise. The truth of the matter -- with respect to both his background and his claims -- is quite different, of course. Sabrosky has deliberately inflated his role in the military and has used that ruse to promote a hateful, fact-free conspiracy theory. In fact, while he did work as an administrator at the U.S. Army War College, he was not, as his job title seems to indicate, the director or dean of the college. Far from it. According to the Press Office of the Army War College, in the mid-1980s, Sabrosky served as a civilian administrator at a research department of the college, supervising the publication of papers written within that department. His job title was "Director of Studies" because he supervised publishing studies done within a department of the college. He was a mid-level civilian manager at a military college, without access to the sort of highly classified material of the sort he now fraudulently claims to have. Moreover, since his employment at that school was about 25 years ago, his employment there would provide him with no special insights with respect to 9/11. How on earth could someone who worked on the level of a college librarian in the 1980s be privy to top secret information revealing a vast hidden conspiracy? And how on earth could he be the only person to know about it or think it worth revealing?
Yes, it seems you did some serious digging .... and you excavated a blogger named Adam Holland ... who has a blog named adam holland. He has a face book page, and a twitter account .. and that's about all he says about himself and his background ... which was also all I could find about him. In other words, who the hell is adam holland and why should anyone consider anything he has to say as being worth a cup of coffee?
Looking over his "blog" ... what I see is a propensity to blog about anyone having anything unkind to say about Israel ... anyone who dares even question the official story of 911 ... and a prolific mud slinger to include furthering the nonsense alluding to Ron Paul being a racist. What that tells me is that he's an Israeli apologist at the very least, and it's not out of the realm of possibility that he's being paid by the SPLC or ADL (it's documented fact that Israel employs thousands of bloggers and social media trolls to crush, defame, and attack anyone unfriendly to Israel). So his opinions hold no more weight or legitimacy than yours do, and I'm sorry to tell you .. that isn't very much. Far from being a "reputable" source ... he's a nobody, with no reputation to analyze.
Now, I've already stated that I don't subscribe to Dr. Sabrosky's opinion that "Israel Did It" because I think that lets too many off the hook, and is not an accurate assessment. However, there is more than enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Israeli Intelligence had foreknowledge of the attacks at the very least ... and it would certainly fit their well established profile to have also participated. We absolutely know that Israel has attacked the United States before (USS Liberty attack) ... and we also know that Israel has a significant espionage element spying on the US ... because they are such great friends. And they thank you ... because much, if not all of those friendly gestures are funded with your tax dollars.
So I can see where Dr. Sabrosky might consider Israel a prime suspect .. as they likely did play a role ... and they do have a very dubious history of false flag attacks for their political gain, with Mosad's motto "By way of deception, make war". But Israel couldn't have "done it" alone, as believed/claimed by the Dr.
So might this.
The last name was familiar as a contributor to the internet tabloid "prison planet" so I did some digging.
Adam Holland: Alan Sabrosky: "Large majority of U.S. Jews are traitors" and Israel did 9/11 attacks. So who the heck is Alan Sabrosky?
Alan Sabrosky: "Large majority of U.S. Jews are traitors" and Israel did 9/11 attacks. So who the heck is Alan Sabrosky?
Sometimes, when an expert makes a serious charge but has no evidence to back it up, it's still newsworthy by dint of the provenance of the charge. The reputation of a source can play a big role in determining when to believe unverifiable charges, or at least report them with a grain of salt.
Alan Sabrosky bills himself as the former Director of Studies at the U.S. Army War College. He has made quite a name for himself in recent months by first declaring himself a military expert with high-level connections in the U.S. military hierarchy, then by outrageously claiming that Israel was responsible for 9/11 and that the U.S. military knows this and is concealing it. While he offers no evidence for this, he claims that he should be trusted because of his expertise. The truth of the matter -- with respect to both his background and his claims -- is quite different, of course. Sabrosky has deliberately inflated his role in the military and has used that ruse to promote a hateful, fact-free conspiracy theory. In fact, while he did work as an administrator at the U.S. Army War College, he was not, as his job title seems to indicate, the director or dean of the college. Far from it. According to the Press Office of the Army War College, in the mid-1980s, Sabrosky served as a civilian administrator at a research department of the college, supervising the publication of papers written within that department. His job title was "Director of Studies" because he supervised publishing studies done within a department of the college. He was a mid-level civilian manager at a military college, without access to the sort of highly classified material of the sort he now fraudulently claims to have. Moreover, since his employment at that school was about 25 years ago, his employment there would provide him with no special insights with respect to 9/11. How on earth could someone who worked on the level of a college librarian in the 1980s be privy to top secret information revealing a vast hidden conspiracy? And how on earth could he be the only person to know about it or think it worth revealing?
Yes, it seems you did some serious digging .... and you excavated a blogger named Adam Holland ... who has a blog named adam holland. He has a face book page, and a twitter account .. and that's about all he says about himself and his background ... which was also all I could find about him. In other words, who the hell is adam holland and why should anyone consider anything he has to say as being worth a cup of coffee?
Looking over his "blog" ... what I see is a propensity to blog about anyone having anything unkind to say about Israel ... anyone who dares even question the official story of 911 ... and a prolific mud slinger to include furthering the nonsense alluding to Ron Paul being a racist. What that tells me is that he's an Israeli apologist at the very least, and it's not out of the realm of possibility that he's being paid by the SPLC or ADL (it's documented fact that Israel employs thousands of bloggers and social media trolls to crush, defame, and attack anyone unfriendly to Israel). So his opinions hold no more weight or legitimacy than yours do, and I'm sorry to tell you .. that isn't very much. Far from being a "reputable" source ... he's a nobody, with no reputation to analyze.
Now, I've already stated that I don't subscribe to Dr. Sabrosky's opinion that "Israel Did It" because I think that lets too many off the hook, and is not an accurate assessment. However, there is more than enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Israeli Intelligence had foreknowledge of the attacks at the very least ... and it would certainly fit their well established profile to have also participated. We absolutely know that Israel has attacked the United States before (USS Liberty attack) ... and we also know that Israel has a significant espionage element spying on the US ... because they are such great friends. And they thank you ... because much, if not all of those friendly gestures are funded with your tax dollars.
So I can see where Dr. Sabrosky might consider Israel a prime suspect .. as they likely did play a role ... and they do have a very dubious history of false flag attacks for their political gain, with Mosad's motto "By way of deception, make war". But Israel couldn't have "done it" alone, as believed/claimed by the Dr.
Ryan Owens has been debunked
Debunking the Debunkers: An Open Letter To Ryan Owens
Ever wonder why so many jews try to cover up what really happened on 9/11?
Frankly, while there are many conspiracy theories about 9/11, I just can't see enough evidence to be sure either way.
I've heard loads of pro Muslims groups claim the attacks were mossad.
However, I've always assumed that was political shit and not worth listening to.
This one is different because of who is saying it.
Alan Sabrosky
Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan), is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College. also a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research.
He is listed in WHO'S WHO IN THE EAST (23rd ed.). A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Dr. Sabrosky's teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government service, he held concurrent adjunct professorships at Georgetown University and the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS).
Dr. Sabrosky has lectured widely on defense and foreign affairs in the United States and abroad.
It's worth 10 minutes of your time.
I'd say the OP pretty much seals the deal -- especially since Hollie's shown that the author is a lying POS.I understand the Taliban hate Jews, too. What makes your attitude towards Jews any better than the Taliban's?Ah, you dislike something so you make fun of it rather than explore the possibility of truth.
I understand theTaliban are anti education; what makes your attitude to investigation and learning better than theirs?
You go ahead. I'll continue to point and laugh at every retard who screeches "JOOOOOOS!!"Every idea from a credible source deserves investigation and this guy is such a source.
It may well be total rubbish but his qualifications and background suggest it's worth a look to see if it holds water.
I'll challenge you.
Find any post of mine where I express hatred towards Jews or Israelis in general, rather than their government and I'll sign out of the forum, never to return.
If you can't find such a post, you apologise, sign out and never return.
Do we have a deal or are you a liar and a coward?
So, you believe his lies because you WANT to.Imagine that -- an irrational Jew-hater lying.
So, Fred, still think this guy's bullshit is worth serious consideration?
Careful, now -- your answer may reveal volumes about you.
I refuse to hate any group for their beliefs or race.
Some people do but it doesn't negate everything else they say
I believe in taking a close look at evidence and making my mind up rather than dismissing something simply because I don't like a person, their religion or politics.
I believe it's called 'an open mind'.
