Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
By attacking the Dems does that mean we follow lock stock and barrel with the GOP.Democrats and Republicans aren't doing a whole lot of good for this country. It continues to amaze me the way you people fight back and forth, defending your team sinking the Titanic faster than the other.
Democrats have always had larger percentage of voters than Republicans. Blue states are more populated than red states yet they both count the same. Cities are more populated than farmland but farmland gets an equal number of representativesGood pointRepublicans have figured out how to rule from the minority
Using gerrymander to hold the House
Having the Senate based on low population states
Far fewer voters actually vote Republican, yet Republicans have a big majority in Congress
You realize Republicans can gerrymander because they are the majority at the State level, LOL. Didn't think that through.
And you never complained about gerrymandering when it inflated Democratic majorities the last 4 decades, did you?
In many of those states Republicans have gerrymandered at the state level to win those state level seats. Democratic cities are placed in one district while farmland is placed in several districts
That doesn't contradict what I said, Alfalfa. Your playground logic aside, they can gerrymander State seats for the same reason. And actually to flip legislatures, they had to overcome Democrat gerrymandered States which required even larger majorities.
And again you show your flagrant hypocrisy. We both know you squawked not a peep the Democrats doing it to super-majority themselves since the 60s. Suddenly it's an issue for you. Yeah, your issue is "gerrymandering." Not.
I am sure you had to ask before the act....Does this mean you are bisexual?Fuck Democrats..............
That sum it up for you...............
LOL
Nope, but that doesn't mean I haven't possible done a Liberal Woman back in the day because she
This seems to be a running theme with certain leftist elements. Do you agree with their assertion? Why or why not?
The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
If you are anti-Federal Republic and anti-Constitution which is the vast majority of libs in both parties, then you are un-American.
Libs today are against and are totally opposite of classical liberal ideology.
Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalism in which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government.
Conservatives are for the Constitution.
As you defend the one who has a phone and a pen...................................Conservatives are for the Constitution.
Assumes facts not in evidence.
The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
If you are anti-Federal Republic and anti-Constitution which is the vast majority of libs in both parties, then you are un-American.
Libs today are against and are totally opposite of classical liberal ideology.
Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalism in which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government.
Complete and utter BS!
That is just the feckless Libertarian attempt to hijack the definition of liberalism.
The Founding Fathers were no different to the liberals of today. They would LOL at Libertarians for being witless impractical fools who don't have a clue as to how to actually run a country.
The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
If you are anti-Federal Republic and anti-Constitution which is the vast majority of libs in both parties, then you are un-American.
Libs today are against and are totally opposite of classical liberal ideology.
Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalism in which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government.
Complete and utter BS!
That is just the feckless Libertarian attempt to hijack the definition of liberalism.
The Founding Fathers were no different to the liberals of today. They would LOL at Libertarians for being witless impractical fools who don't have a clue as to how to actually run a country.
They are not 'for' much of its case law, however; where the Constitution exists solely in the context of its case law.Same with the conservatives....Liberalism is liberalism, dummy. We are just 230 years smarter than the Liberals who founded the place. They wanted a government that served their needs and so do we. You, however, want to live 230 years ago.The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
If you are anti-Federal Republic and anti-Constitution which is the vast majority of libs in both parties, then you are un-American.
Libs today are against and are totally opposite of classical liberal ideology.
Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalism in which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government.
No I don't.
Our Constitutional rights as they wanted it, were for their time as well as ours and they made it so that it could be added through a process for future generations.
They made the Constitution for the future as well as for their times.
We are not following the constitution in our amendments, to do what we are doing now.
If libs want to do what they are doing they should have gone with getting new constitutional amendments.
I said libs in both parties.
Conservatives are for the Constitution.
The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
If you are anti-Federal Republic and anti-Constitution which is the vast majority of libs in both parties, then you are un-American.
Libs today are against and are totally opposite of classical liberal ideology.
Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalism in which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government.
Complete and utter BS!
That is just the feckless Libertarian attempt to hijack the definition of liberalism.
The Founding Fathers were no different to the liberals of today. They would LOL at Libertarians for being witless impractical fools who don't have a clue as to how to actually run a country.
Did they or did they not fight a war to get away from big overbearing government?
Democrats have always had larger percentage of voters than Republicans. Blue states are more populated than red states yet they both count the same. Cities are more populated than farmland but farmland gets an equal number of representativesGood pointRepublicans have figured out how to rule from the minority
Using gerrymander to hold the House
Having the Senate based on low population states
Far fewer voters actually vote Republican, yet Republicans have a big majority in Congress
You realize Republicans can gerrymander because they are the majority at the State level, LOL. Didn't think that through.
And you never complained about gerrymandering when it inflated Democratic majorities the last 4 decades, did you?
In many of those states Republicans have gerrymandered at the state level to win those state level seats. Democratic cities are placed in one district while farmland is placed in several districts
That doesn't contradict what I said, Alfalfa. Your playground logic aside, they can gerrymander State seats for the same reason. And actually to flip legislatures, they had to overcome Democrat gerrymandered States which required even larger majorities.
And again you show your flagrant hypocrisy. We both know you squawked not a peep the Democrats doing it to super-majority themselves since the 60s. Suddenly it's an issue for you. Yeah, your issue is "gerrymandering." Not.
Not a laughing matter, but whatever.The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
Hey, no problem.Not a laughing matter, but whatever.The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
Those are the other little morons here. If you don't like my liberal nation then get the fuck out, it wasn't founded for you.The opinions and thought processes of hardcore partisan ideologues are always fascinating to me.Not a laughing matter, but whatever.The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
Trolling with old bait again.................hmmmmThose are the other little morons here. If you don't like my liberal nation then get the fuck out, it wasn't founded for you.The opinions and thought processes of hardcore partisan ideologues are always fascinating to me.Not a laughing matter, but whatever.The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
Excellent!Those are the other little morons here. If you don't like my liberal nation then get the fuck out, it wasn't founded for you.The opinions and thought processes of hardcore partisan ideologues are always fascinating to me.Not a laughing matter, but whatever.The US is a Liberal Nation. If you aren't liberal then you are un-American. Now you know.
