D
Deleted member 53821
Guest
A passport denotes country of origin so if we are going to revoke passports we are picking on someone because of what country they come from.
Would this be a fair way to deal with immigrants?
- Thread starter Clementine
- Start date
A passport denotes country of origin so if we are going to revoke passports we are picking on someone because of what country they come from.
For 30+ years the right has been telling us that Carter was a ***** who did nothing to keep us safe.
They would often contrast him with Reagan, who, they claimed, was tough on Iran and terrorism.
But here's the fucked up thing.
Reagan got caught selling weapons to Iran behind the backs of congress and the American people. Reagan increased funding to the radical Saudi Royals, and he weaponized/funded the Mujahideen in Afghanistan. He also supported a young Hussein (because the U.S. lost a key regional ally (The Shaw) in neighboring Iran).
Point is: once you look at the historical record, you realize that Carter was much tougher on terrorism than Reagan,
The Left knew this all along, but the Right lives in a bubble where the intertwined histories of Reagan and Carter are mythologized to make Reagan look much tougher than he actually was (especially when it came to terrorists, who Reagan made stronger).
It's about time that the Right acknowledges that Carter was much tougher on Iran than he was ever given credit for.
They would often contrast him with Reagan, who, they claimed, was tough on Iran and terrorism.
But here's the fucked up thing.
Reagan got caught selling weapons to Iran behind the backs of congress and the American people. Reagan increased funding to the radical Saudi Royals, and he weaponized/funded the Mujahideen in Afghanistan. He also supported a young Hussein (because the U.S. lost a key regional ally (The Shaw) in neighboring Iran).
Point is: once you look at the historical record, you realize that Carter was much tougher on terrorism than Reagan,
The Left knew this all along, but the Right lives in a bubble where the intertwined histories of Reagan and Carter are mythologized to make Reagan look much tougher than he actually was (especially when it came to terrorists, who Reagan made stronger).
It's about time that the Right acknowledges that Carter was much tougher on Iran than he was ever given credit for.
whitehall
Diamond Member
The issue is freaking hopeless under the Hussein administration. Barry's idiot A.G. couldn't answer a simple question about so-called "sanctuary cities" which are clearly in violation of federal law. The female half of the San Bernadino terrorists was allegedly in the U.S. illegally with a falsified visa and the Feds were apparently aware of their radicalism back in 2012. Barry's A.G. threatened to arrest anyone who was guilty of insulting Muslems while her own FBI statistics indicated that Jews were most likely to be victims of hate crimes in the U.S. The situation is hopeless until Jan 20, 2017.
This is easy:
And that doesn't take in the facts that they are poorer countries.
That was not what said... Is UK a muslim country? there is 2.7 million of them... How about the 10% of Syria that are Christian...
There is 134 million Muslims in India are they a muslim country?
You haven't thought this one out
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Canadian military Whistleblowers-"More than 30 Petawawa troops suffer frostbite during Arctic exercise"- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 0
-
The Reason the Democrats – and Only the Democrats – Side with Iran- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
