Would someone ask Comey why Hillary wasn't charge with breaking these laws?

[Care4all]

Could it be because of Attorney General Lynch's visit with Bill in June?

The case was decided two to three weeks BEFORE Bill saw Lynch at the airport....

they had said in the news at least two weeks before Comey made his announcement on the Clinton case...

that the FBI was done with their investigation

so no, the Lynch meet up with Bill had nothing to do with it.

He said she committed no criminal act that he or any Prosecutor could charge her with and win.

Here are 3 prosecutors that disagree with Comey
The FBI Says ‘Reasonable Prosecutors’ Wouldn’t Charge Hillary — Meet Some Who Disagree

“As a former federal prosecutor with more than 350 criminal cases under my belt, I take serious issue with Director Comey’s conclusions,” said Sidney Powell, a former federal prosecutor in Texas and Virginia.
“The applicable statute does not require specific intent to violate the law. Indeed, the only real issue is whether Secretary Clinton allowed classified information to be transmitted to her personal e-mail account. That alone is a felony count for each e-mail so transmitted — whether marked classified or not.”

“As a former assistant U.S. attorney, it looks to me like it would’ve been an easy case to win,” Faith Ryan Whittlesey said. The one-time federal prosecutor in Pennsylvania advised President Ronald Reagan and was his envoy to Switzerland. She added, “As a former U.S. ambassador . . . if I had handled classified material in such a careless manner, exposing the material to the prying eyes of possible actors with interests adverse to those of the U.S., I certainly would have been prosecuted.”
Read more at: The FBI Says ‘Reasonable Prosecutors’ Wouldn’t Charge Hillary — Meet Some Who Disagree

Former attorney general Michael Mukasey explained in Wednesday’s Wall Street Journal what little it would have taken to indict Hillary Clinton on misdemeanor charges. The misdemeanor involves simply the knowing removal of classified documents to an unauthorized location. That is the statute to which David Petraeus, the former U.S. Army general and Central Intelligence Agency director, pleaded guilty in 2015. (He had disclosed classified documents to his biographer/mistress, who also had top-secret clearance, returned the information to him and never disclosed it in his biography or elsewhere.)

Read more at: The FBI Says ‘Reasonable Prosecutors’ Wouldn’t Charge Hillary — Meet Some Who Disagree

NOTE "Intent", "Motive" is never an excuse NOT to prosecute!
Petraeus was guilty "regardless" of intent!
I'd ask Comey this question:
"If I hit a little kid at a school cross walk because I was texting I'd be found guilty, regardless of my 'intent', so why in Hillary is 'intent' an issue"?

They are all WRONG.

She never REMOVED CLASSIFIED information from its proper place to her personal server....

The stuff that was top SECRET on her computer came from a non gov't source...tis why she and her staff did not believe it was top SECRET, and why NONE of the emails were marked classified.....none came from any gov't source.

So she could NOT be charged with that....

 

[Care4all]

Could it be because of Attorney General Lynch's visit with Bill in June?

The case was decided two to three weeks BEFORE Bill saw Lynch at the airport....

they had said in the news at least two weeks before Comey made his announcement on the Clinton case...

that the FBI was done with their investigation

so no, the Lynch meet up with Bill had nothing to do with it.

He said she committed no criminal act that he or any Prosecutor could charge her with and win.

Not according to Comey!
Comey:
Loretta Lynch's Tarmac Meeting With Bill Clinton Forced Me To Go Public About Clinton Investigation
Comey: Loretta Lynch's Tarmac Meeting With Bill Clinton Forced Me To Go Public About Clinton Investigation

Appearance purpose only.

 

[easyt65]

'Would someone ask Comey why Hillary wasn't charge with breaking these laws?'

He was asked when he testified under oath before Congress yesterday - he said because she was TOO STUPID, despite all of her training, to know she was breaking the law.

 

[easyt65]

They are all WRONG.

She never REMOVED CLASSIFIED information from its proper place to her personal server....

The stuff that was top SECRET on her computer came from a non gov't source...tis why she and her staff did not believe it was top SECRET, and why NONE of the emails were marked classified.....none came from any gov't source.

So she could NOT be charged with that....

So you are not going to even believe Comey's own Testimony?

Snowflakes be like...

 

[BULLDOG]

Perhaps you should do a little research. He has answered those questions lots of times.

NO Comey has NEVER BEEN ASKED...."What level do you need to get to to actually prove intent?"!
Utah GOP Rep. Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, told Fox News’ “Special Report with Bret Bair” on Sunday night said he wasn’t surprise by the letter and continues to have questions -- including whether Clinton has lied under oath about mishandling classified information in her State Department emails and what is the threshold to prove criminal intent.

“What level do you need to get to to actually prove intent?” Chaffetz asked.
“They did not answer the question yet as to whether Hillary Clinton has committed perjury.”
FBI's Comey tells Congress email review completed, decision not to prosecute Clinton stands

You're whining because he didn't answer a question that Chaffetz didn't ask? You know that just sounds silly, right?

 

[Care4all]

Out of all of that hoopdeedah about classified email on her server, only 4 email chains have remained CLASSIFIED.

FOUR.

FOUR.

And those 4 emails with top SECRET info in them, came from Syd Bloomenthal, an outside source for information Hillary used.... She gave his info to her staff to check out. Sometimes his info was accurate and useable information, and other times his info was not accurate and not useable.

Her staff used the State.gov email system to communicate which is the email system for the State Dept and is an UNCLASSIFIED system....

The staff researched the Bloomenthal information and conversed with each other on this UNCLASSIFIED system for 2 years before getting to Hillary with their analysis on some of the Bloomenthal info. All that time this info was Top Secret classified info that the CIA had gathered from other sources....there were 2 sources, the CIA and Bloomenthal....her staff was unaware of the CIA info.

Where Hillary and her high clearance staff were careless in using the State.gov UNCLASSIFIED email and Hillary server also UNCLASSIFIED was that the info should have been recognized as CLASSIFIED and should have been designated top SECRET classified by Hillary or one of her high up assistants the minute they read it!!!!

 

[oreo]

I was watching Hannity on Fox tonight and Jay Sekulow an attorney with these credentials:
Education B.A. Mercer University (law)
J.D. Mercer University (law)
PhD Regent University (legal history)
Occupation Civil Attorney (ACLJ)
Showed this chart.
So why didn't Comey charge her?
Could it be because of Attorney General Lynch's visit with Bill in June?
View attachment 124624

In answer to that question, Comey stated that she didn't break any laws.

To add insult to injury this is who Trump was considering for his Secretary of State--who actually was charged by the FBI for mishandling classified documents and then lying about it.

Republicans have long insisted that former CIA Director Gen. David Petraeus' mishandling of classified information was far less egregious misconduct than Hillary Clinton's private email use while leading the State Department.

The talking point has gained steam this week after FBI Director James Comey recommended that the Justice Department bring no charges against Clinton, with presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump even suggesting a nefarious motive behind the decision.

On Thursday, Comey was given an opportunity to rebut some of those charges during a hearing on Capitol Hill before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

"The Petraeus case, to my mind, illustrates perfectly the kind of cases the Department of Justice is willing to prosecute," Comey told the committee.

Petraeus, the four-star general who oversaw military operations in both Afghanistan and Iraq, resigned as CIA director in 2012 after his extramarital affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell, became public.

The FBI and Justice Department later recommended felony charges against him for sharing classified information with Broadwell. He ultimately avoided jail time after pleading guilty to a misdemeanor last year, resulting in two years probation and a $100,000 fine. At the time, members of Congress from both sides of the aisle rallied to Petraeus' defense and criticized the Justice Department for pursuing the case.

Republicans have argued that Petraeus' malfeasance was petty, especially relative to Clinton's use of a private email servers.

Comey pointed out that Petraeus not only shared the classified information, but also hid the documents in his attic and then lied to investigators.

"So you have obstruction of justice, you have intentional misconduct and a vast quantity of information," Comey said. "He admitted he knew that was the wrong thing to do. That is a perfect illustration of the kind of cases that get prosecuted."

He added: "In my mind, it illustrates importantly the distinction to this case."
James Comey: David Petraeus case worse than Hillary Clinton's emails - CNNPolitics.com

What was Petraeus' INTENT???

He intended to give classified documents to his mistress, a journalist without a security clearance. He intended to and did it. "It" was against the law and he knew it.

So where are YOUR LINKS to your very ignorant opinion?

Sorry but you are wrong!
As former US attorney general Eric Holder put it in 2015, “There were some unique things that existed in that case that would have made the prosecution at the felony level and a conviction at the felony level very, very, very problematic,” according to The Post.
At the same time, intent doesn't necessarily matter in cases involving mishandled classified information.
The government was bearish about its chances of convicting a CIA director who had knowingly given highly sensitive classified information to his mistress.

The challenges of convicting a former secretary of state and a major party presidential front-runner in an election year — and in a case where any alleged intelligence disclosures didn't involve nearly the same degree of premeditation as in Petraeus' case — are probably much steeper.

As The Post reports, Petraeus' case had a number of challenging aspects for prosecutors.
Despite her sexual relationship with Petraeus, Broadwell was protected from prosecution by her status as a biographer and credentialed journalist.
Petraeus did not intend for the information he gave Broadwell to spread beyond her or to be made public, and he personally vetted Broadwell's book for any classified information. The Post notes that "Justice Department guidelines" hold that "it is not policy to charge [for lying to federal agents] 'in situations in which a suspect, during an investigation, merely denies guilt in response to questioning by the government.'”
Here's how David Petraeus got off with only a misdemeanor

Without "intent" to do wrong--in the workplace you cannot be charged. That's why people at work who make "errors"--sometimes very "costly ones" are never charged with a crime--because they did NOT INTEND to make the error.

You people kept questioning the reason for immunity for the State Department Senior IT staffer--(who set up her server.) The reason he got immunity is because if there was anyone that should have known setting up a private server was the wrong thing to do--it would have been a Senior IT staffer working at the State Department. The reason for immunity is he had probably set up other home servers and it was never an issue until now.

Also if Hillary Clinton were going to be charged they would have had to charge Colin Powell and Condi Rice as they had the exact same email issues when they were Secretary's of State.

The bottom line: Democrats may try to turn the revelations about the email accounts used by Powell and Rice’s staff into a scandal. They may release press statements condemning the former secretaries of state; they may call for scores of unnecessary congressional hearings; they may go to the press and confidently proclaim that crimes were committed by these honorable Republicans. But it would all be lies. Powell and Rice did nothing wrong. This could be considered a scandal only by ignorant or lying partisans.So there is no Powell or Rice email scandal. And no doubt, that will infuriate the Republicans who are trying so hard to trick people into believing Clinton committed a crime by doing the exact same thing as her predecessors.
The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter
State Department: Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice staffers received classified info via personal email - CNNPolitics.com

The tide has changed now. If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi & endless email talk, it's not to hard to imagine what Democrats are going to do with Treason, Obstruction & Lies when they take over in 2018. You'll also get a great education on what that Emoluments clause in the Constitution is all about.
The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump | Brookings Institution

 

[BluesLegend]

What are ye afraid of? Bring it on!!!!

Be careful what you wish for.

This is how the Court Case goes:

Judge: Mrs Clinton is here today being charged of using a private server for governmental information. Is she the first SOS to do this?

Prosecutor: No. SOS Powell did it also. Also C Rice...

Judge: Why isn't Powell being prosecuted and why didn't you search his emails?

Prosecutor: He deleted them which we know is against the law.

Judge: So why her?

Prosecutor: But these could have been Classified?

Judge: Who Makes them Classified?

Prosecutor: The State Dept which was run by Mrs Clinton.

Judge: Can you show any actions done by Mrs Clinton put any US personnel in danger?

Prosecutor: No.

Judge: Can you show Criminal Intent which is needed for this charge (pick one they all need it) against a citizen?

Prosecutor: No.


Judge: Case Closed. I would like to apologise to Mrs. Clinton for this frivolous charge and would apologise to her for this obvious politically motivated harassment.

Powell did no such thing you are LYING like you libwits always do.

 

[Clementine]

The answer is still intent, dumbasses.

Fine. Hillary is considered intelligent, right? And she, of all people, would certainly have an understanding of the laws regarding the way any classified and other work emails are to be handled, right?

She also knows what it means to tell the truth, right?

So, when she failed to turn over all work-related emails, as required by law, then she had to know it was against the law not to do so. Therefore, she intentionally chose not to do that. She also understands what deleting emails is all about. I mean, how could anyone with a modicum of common sense actually believe that wiping a server is done with a cloth. Someone went to the trouble of using BleachBit. Again, intentional.

If anyone is going to claim that her actions were unintentional then they are saying she is so fucking stupid that she is unable to grasp the simple concept of security.

Take your pick. Did she deliberately hide and delete emails or is she really just a complete moron when it comes to our national security?

 

[Syriusly]

So why didn't Comey charge her?
Could it be because of Attorney General Lynch's visit with Bill in June?
]

You apparently aren't keeping up- Comey has been asked that by the GOP for months now- and has answered that repeatedly.

And fyi- this week he mentioned that Lynch's visit with Bill was a deciding factor in

Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch's private meeting with former President Bill Clinton aboard his airplane last year ultimately led to James Comey's decision to go public with the results of the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, the agency's director said Wednesday.

 

[Siete]

will somebody tell the idiot op the FBI doesnt prosecute ?

 

[healthmyths]

Out of all of that hoopdeedah about classified email on her server, only 4 email chains have remained CLASSIFIED.

FOUR.

FOUR.

And those 4 emails with top SECRET info in them, came from Syd Bloomenthal, an outside source for information Hillary used.... She gave his info to her staff to check out. Sometimes his info was accurate and useable information, and other times his info was not accurate and not useable.

Her staff used the State.gov email system to communicate which is the email system for the State Dept and is an UNCLASSIFIED system....

The staff researched the Bloomenthal information and conversed with each other on this UNCLASSIFIED system for 2 years before getting to Hillary with their analysis on some of the Bloomenthal info. All that time this info was Top Secret classified info that the CIA had gathered from other sources....there were 2 sources, the CIA and Bloomenthal....her staff was unaware of the CIA info.

Where Hillary and her high clearance staff were careless in using the State.gov UNCLASSIFIED email and Hillary server also UNCLASSIFIED was that the info should have been recognized as CLASSIFIED and should have been designated top SECRET classified by Hillary or one of her high up assistants the minute they read it!!!!

How do you know?

We are trusting a person who apparently was too stupid to know or accept the terms of the NDA Laying Out Criminal Penalties for Mishandling of Classified Info
As the nation’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton was responsible for ascertaining whether information in her possession was classified and acknowledged that "negligent handling" of that information could jeopardize national security, according to a copy of an agreement she signed upon taking the job.

So how do we know what was on the "deleted" emails? Remember she ignored the NDA so how do YOU KNOW among the 33,000 deleted emails
there weren't any "classified"???

Why Hillary Clinton Deleted 33,000 Emails on Her Private Email Server

In late 2014, the State Department asked Clinton and other former secretaries of state to hand over any work-related emails they may have.
By then, Clinton had already "deleted some [emails] over time as an ordinary user would," FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers at a July congressional hearing.
Why Hillary Clinton Deleted 33,000 Emails

 

[badbob85037]

I was watching Hannity on Fox tonight and Jay Sekulow an attorney with these credentials:
Education B.A. Mercer University (law)
J.D. Mercer University (law)
PhD Regent University (legal history)
Occupation Civil Attorney (ACLJ)
Showed this chart.
So why didn't Comey charge her?
Could it be because of Attorney General Lynch's visit with Bill in June?
View attachment 124624

She had to do that or she would have got caught in her pay to play treason. Her and the rapist have been selling out America to the highest bidder for decades.

 

[Care4all]

How do you know?

We are trusting a person who apparently was too stupid to know or accept the terms of the NDA Laying Out Criminal Penalties for Mishandling of Classified Info
As the nation’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton was responsible for ascertaining whether information in her possession was classified and acknowledged that "negligent handling" of that information could jeopardize national security, according to a copy of an agreement she signed upon taking the job.

So how do we know what was on the "deleted" emails? Remember she ignored the NDA so how do YOU KNOW among the 33,000 deleted emails
there weren't any "classified"???

Why Hillary Clinton Deleted 33,000 Emails on Her Private Email Server

In late 2014, the State Department asked Clinton and other former secretaries of state to hand over any work-related emails they may have.
By then, Clinton had already "deleted some [emails] over time as an ordinary user would," FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers at a July congressional hearing.
Why Hillary Clinton Deleted 33,000 Emails

Because the FBI checked, and they went through the emails of all of her staff, on all her correspondence to make certain the National Archives had all of her govt emails....in her NARA files.