Read WHAT further? The PETA website? I asked what research YOU did, not them. The thread? Did that, haven't seen an answer, so kindly pick your uppity little wedgie out of your crack and answer the question, now that I'm being forced to ask it a second time. Believe it or not, it's completely legitimate for me to question a newbie as to why I should trust anything he posts.
OH the newbie thing? well you can kiss my newbie arse I don't owe you a damn thing. IT WAS THE VIDEO i WAS MORE INTRESTED IN THEN THE PETA CRAP
Wrong, Sparky. You owe me and everyone else here the initial effort to gain credibility and distinguish yourself from the rest of the ignorant rabble we constantly have coming in here and wasting our screen space. That's if you want to actually be listened to and taken seriously. If you don't mind being dismissed as an oxygen thief with nothing worthwhile to say, then hold onto that frigging attitude and just demand that I take your word for shit without proof. I can have your ass on ignore in a heartbeat.
Last time before I dismiss you as a
poseur: How much time and effort did YOU spend actually verifying this story before you came running in here squealing about the "poor, abused chickens"? Right now, what I'm hearing is that you were surfing porn, ran across a PETA site, and just believed what they told you outright.