Worst Day Yet for Trump's "Legal" Team

Toro

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2005
106,887
41,644
2,250
Surfing the Oceans of Liquidity
They lost six cases over the last two days. By my count, that takes Team Trump to 1-46 in court.
Just over a month after the Nov. 3 election, the Trump campaign and other Republicans suing over Biden’s win were dealt court losses across six states where they have tried to contest the results of the presidential race — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada and Wisconsin.​
Judges ruled decisively that Trump’s side has not proven the election was fraudulent, with some offering painstaking analyses of why such claims lack merit and pointed opinions about the risks the legal claims pose to American democracy.
“It can be easy to blithely move on to the next case with a petition so obviously lacking, but this is sobering,” wrote Justice Brian Hagedorn of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, agreeing with the court’s decision not to hear a lawsuit filed by a conservative group that sought to invalidate the election in that state. ...​
Two of the biggest defeats took place in Arizona and Nevada, where judges tossed full-scale challenges to the states’ election results filed by the Republican Party and the Trump campaign, respectively. Both judges noted in their opinions that the plaintiffs did not prove their claims of fraud.​
In a detailed, 35-page decision, Judge James T. Russell of the Nevada District Court in Carson City vetted each claim of fraud and wrongdoing made by the Trump campaign in the state and found that none was supported by convincing proof. The judge dismissed the challenge with prejudice, ruling that the campaign failed to offer any basis for annulling more than 1.3 million votes cast in the state’s presidential race.​
The campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor in an amount equal to or greater than” Biden’s margin of victory, which was about 33,600 votes, Russell wrote. ...​
In his ruling, Russell concurred with election officials and academic experts that there is no evidence [of 61,000 people voting twice], and specifically dismissed witness declarations that had been touted by the campaign, calling them “self-serving statements of little or no evidentiary value.” ...​
While the [Wisconsin] hearing largely dealt only with setting a rapid schedule of filings and hearings next week, Ludwig — a Trump nominee who took the bench only in September — noted that the president has requested “extraordinary” relief.​
He added that he had a “very, very hard time” seeing why Trump brought the action in federal court. Ludwig also termed a Trump request to “remand” the election back to the state legislature “bizarre.”​
Meanwhile, in Arizona, Judge Randall Warner of the Maricopa County Superior County ruled Friday that he found “no misconduct, no fraud and no effect on the outcome of the election” in a suit brought by Arizona Republican Party and state party chairwoman Kelli Ward. ...​
The Trump campaign faced several other legal defeats around the country on Friday — including in Minnesota, where the state’s highest court dismissed a Republican lawsuit seeking to delay certification of the election results. Biden beat Trump there by more than 233,012 votes.​


Trump supporters thinking that they are going to have the election overturned in the Supreme Court are like the drunk at the bar who thinks that their 1-46 baseball team is going to win the World Series, and the only reason why they didn't have more wins was because the umps and the league were rigged against them.
 
From conservative Wisconsin Justice Brian Hagerdorn:
Nonetheless, I feel compelled to share a further observation. Something far more fundamental than the winner of Wisconsin’s electoral votes is implicated in this case. At stake, in some measure, is faith in our system of free and fair elections, a feature central to the enduring strength of our constitutional republic. It can be easy to blithely move on to the next case with a petition so obviously lacking, but this is sobering. The relief being sought by the petitioners is the most dramatic invocation of judicial power I have ever seen. Judicial acquiescence to such entreaties built on so flimsy a foundation would do indelible damage to every future election. Once the door is opened to judicial invalidation of presidential election results, it will be awfully hard to close that door again. This is a dangerous path we are being asked to tread. The loss of public trust in our constitutional order resulting from the exercise of this kind of judicial power would be incalculable.

I do not mean to suggest this court should look the other way no matter what. But if there is a sufficient basis to invalidate an election, it must be established with evidence and arguments commensurate with the scale of the claims and the relief sought. These petitioners have come nowhere close. While the rough and tumble world of electoral politics may be the prism through which many view this litigation, it cannot be so for us. In these hallowed halls, the law must rule.
 
Bypassing who won or lost.....this whole shitmess will do one thing in future. Less voting, because why bother?

I am taking notes.

I will be volunteering next election and you can bet I'll be versed in how to "help it along".
 
They lost six cases over the last two days. By my count, that takes Team Trump to 1-46 in court.
Just over a month after the Nov. 3 election, the Trump campaign and other Republicans suing over Biden’s win were dealt court losses across six states where they have tried to contest the results of the presidential race — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada and Wisconsin.​
Judges ruled decisively that Trump’s side has not proven the election was fraudulent, with some offering painstaking analyses of why such claims lack merit and pointed opinions about the risks the legal claims pose to American democracy.
“It can be easy to blithely move on to the next case with a petition so obviously lacking, but this is sobering,” wrote Justice Brian Hagedorn of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, agreeing with the court’s decision not to hear a lawsuit filed by a conservative group that sought to invalidate the election in that state. ...​
Two of the biggest defeats took place in Arizona and Nevada, where judges tossed full-scale challenges to the states’ election results filed by the Republican Party and the Trump campaign, respectively. Both judges noted in their opinions that the plaintiffs did not prove their claims of fraud.​
In a detailed, 35-page decision, Judge James T. Russell of the Nevada District Court in Carson City vetted each claim of fraud and wrongdoing made by the Trump campaign in the state and found that none was supported by convincing proof. The judge dismissed the challenge with prejudice, ruling that the campaign failed to offer any basis for annulling more than 1.3 million votes cast in the state’s presidential race.​
The campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor in an amount equal to or greater than” Biden’s margin of victory, which was about 33,600 votes, Russell wrote. ...​
In his ruling, Russell concurred with election officials and academic experts that there is no evidence [of 61,000 people voting twice], and specifically dismissed witness declarations that had been touted by the campaign, calling them “self-serving statements of little or no evidentiary value.” ...​
While the [Wisconsin] hearing largely dealt only with setting a rapid schedule of filings and hearings next week, Ludwig — a Trump nominee who took the bench only in September — noted that the president has requested “extraordinary” relief.​
He added that he had a “very, very hard time” seeing why Trump brought the action in federal court. Ludwig also termed a Trump request to “remand” the election back to the state legislature “bizarre.”​
Meanwhile, in Arizona, Judge Randall Warner of the Maricopa County Superior County ruled Friday that he found “no misconduct, no fraud and no effect on the outcome of the election” in a suit brought by Arizona Republican Party and state party chairwoman Kelli Ward. ...​
The Trump campaign faced several other legal defeats around the country on Friday — including in Minnesota, where the state’s highest court dismissed a Republican lawsuit seeking to delay certification of the election results. Biden beat Trump there by more than 233,012 votes.​


Trump supporters thinking that they are going to have the election overturned in the Supreme Court are like the drunk at the bar who thinks that their 1-46 baseball team is going to win the World Series, and the only reason why they didn't have more wins was because the umps and the league were rigged against them.
But.. I thought of you make a bunch of people signed AFFIDAVITS ™ you automatically won.
 
They lost six cases over the last two days. By my count, that takes Team Trump to 1-46 in court.
Considering I think they only had four cases... You seem to be off by quite a bit.

Edit: Unless of course you are attributing to Trump cases that he had nothing to do with. Which... Ok... Just say that.
 
No matter how much evidence is presented, the fifth column media will say there is none.


.....and the sheeple will simply go on with their lives without missing a bleat.
 
Four losses in four states over two days.

And Trump needs to overturn THREE states in order to bail his corrupt ass out
 
They lost six cases over the last two days. By my count, that takes Team Trump to 1-46 in court.
Just over a month after the Nov. 3 election, the Trump campaign and other Republicans suing over Biden’s win were dealt court losses across six states where they have tried to contest the results of the presidential race — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada and Wisconsin.​
Judges ruled decisively that Trump’s side has not proven the election was fraudulent, with some offering painstaking analyses of why such claims lack merit and pointed opinions about the risks the legal claims pose to American democracy.
“It can be easy to blithely move on to the next case with a petition so obviously lacking, but this is sobering,” wrote Justice Brian Hagedorn of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, agreeing with the court’s decision not to hear a lawsuit filed by a conservative group that sought to invalidate the election in that state. ...​
Two of the biggest defeats took place in Arizona and Nevada, where judges tossed full-scale challenges to the states’ election results filed by the Republican Party and the Trump campaign, respectively. Both judges noted in their opinions that the plaintiffs did not prove their claims of fraud.​
In a detailed, 35-page decision, Judge James T. Russell of the Nevada District Court in Carson City vetted each claim of fraud and wrongdoing made by the Trump campaign in the state and found that none was supported by convincing proof. The judge dismissed the challenge with prejudice, ruling that the campaign failed to offer any basis for annulling more than 1.3 million votes cast in the state’s presidential race.​
The campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor in an amount equal to or greater than” Biden’s margin of victory, which was about 33,600 votes, Russell wrote. ...​
In his ruling, Russell concurred with election officials and academic experts that there is no evidence [of 61,000 people voting twice], and specifically dismissed witness declarations that had been touted by the campaign, calling them “self-serving statements of little or no evidentiary value.” ...​
While the [Wisconsin] hearing largely dealt only with setting a rapid schedule of filings and hearings next week, Ludwig — a Trump nominee who took the bench only in September — noted that the president has requested “extraordinary” relief.​
He added that he had a “very, very hard time” seeing why Trump brought the action in federal court. Ludwig also termed a Trump request to “remand” the election back to the state legislature “bizarre.”​
Meanwhile, in Arizona, Judge Randall Warner of the Maricopa County Superior County ruled Friday that he found “no misconduct, no fraud and no effect on the outcome of the election” in a suit brought by Arizona Republican Party and state party chairwoman Kelli Ward. ...​
The Trump campaign faced several other legal defeats around the country on Friday — including in Minnesota, where the state’s highest court dismissed a Republican lawsuit seeking to delay certification of the election results. Biden beat Trump there by more than 233,012 votes.​


Trump supporters thinking that they are going to have the election overturned in the Supreme Court are like the drunk at the bar who thinks that their 1-46 baseball team is going to win the World Series, and the only reason why they didn't have more wins was because the umps and the league were rigged against them.
If you ask any of the RWNJs about the many separate judges and courts throwing out suit after suit brought them by the impeached president trump's crack legal team, the RWNJs will simply say it is MORE evidence in the conspiracy to cheat their cheeto-in-chief out of his second term.

Only in the RWNJs' fantasy reality could there be so very many conspiracies, some worldwide, out to "get" American conservatives. A new one comes along almost every day.

The guy selling them their tinfoil hats must be making a fortune, and the impeached president trump gets a cut of the profits.


.

.
 
In a detailed, 35-page decision, Judge James T. Russell of the Nevada District Court in Carson City vetted each claim of fraud and wrongdoing made by the Trump campaign in the state and found that none was supported by convincing proof. The judge dismissed the challenge with prejudice, ruling that the campaign failed to offer any basis for annulling more than 1.3 million votes cast in the state’s presidential race.
The Constitution is hereby suspended until all Democrat judges and lawyers are impeached, disbarred and sent off to re-education camps to learn why we the people will never allow them to infringe our right to bear arms again.
 
In a detailed, 35-page decision, Judge James T. Russell of the Nevada District Court in Carson City vetted each claim of fraud and wrongdoing made by the Trump campaign in the state and found that none was supported by convincing proof. The judge dismissed the challenge with prejudice, ruling that the campaign failed to offer any basis for annulling more than 1.3 million votes cast in the state’s presidential race.
The Constitution is hereby suspended until all Democrat judges and lawyers are impeached, disbarred and sent off to re-education camps to learn why we the people will never allow them to infringe our right to bear arms again.
I have owned guns since I was 7 and have yet to have any one take one. Who the hell has taken one of yours. I here about infringement on guns but have never experienced it. Want infringement privacy in what is infringed
 

Forum List

Back
Top