There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative.
www.weforum.org
actual info on whats coming soon to every person on earth, please listen/read/watch. scary stuff!
With Democrats taking control, guess who is going to once again be the patsy footing the bill for this and all the other corrupt global organizations? That's right, good old Uncle Stupid.
The World Economic Forum is the international organization committed to improving the state of the world through public-private cooperation in the spirit of ...
They have been rigging electronic voting machines since around 2004.
It wouldn't have mattered how you voted.
They had already knew how the election was going to turn out. . .
See, the thing is, they were encouraging "mail-in" voting as a distraction, it is the oldest illusionist magic trick in the book. It's called, "sleight of hand."
. . . and, given what has happened in the past, over the course of the last two decades, as nothing has happened to improve the system, and it is just the way that these folks have intended it to work.
Yeah, chances are, Biden will be President.
. . . and if he isn't? There is no way that Trump will be able to convince the brainwashed masses of the Deep State's clandestine fraud that was perpetrated otherwise. Trump will just look like a Strong man dictator, no better than Putin, Xi, or Kim Jong-un. IOW, ironically, everything they have been accusing him of being for years.
To help you gain clarity, this is some other writing from some other posts I have made on this issue;
"The point is. Polls, at this point, are a fairly tale. The NSA and silicon valley, with the use of meta -data and cell phones, already know how just about 95% or more of the population are going to vote, where they are going vote, and why they are going to vote on-- and what motivates them.
Polling is just an antiquated fairy tale, as is the "undecided voter."
The sophisticated algorithms they use now, can pretty much predict who these undecides are going to go for based on their behavior and media consumption, before even they do. Now, it is all about getting out the vote to make the election look legitimate. . . the folks controlling the whole scam will tweak it to get the results they want.
Not only can these sophisticated algorithms predict who folks are going to vote for, but, given what apps. folks use, they can also influence who they will vote for once they know their proclivities, by targeting them with certain content. IOW, polling? It is an illusion, and has been for the last decade, it is obsolete, except for among users that don't, or aren't dependent on tech. Unless they know what is going on, and withdraw from tech on purpose.
"The person that is the expert on this in our nation is Dr. Cynthia McKinney. She was a 6 time congress woman, member of the DNC progressive caucus, and member of the congressional black Caucus.
Even she maintains the Deep State has robbed Trump. How does she know? Because they started with her. . . .
These are links to a private lawsuit funded by poll watchers that she led me to. I do not know if it will see court before the vote is verified, but there are sworn exhibits by the former Secretary of State of Michigan.
They have been rigging electronic voting machines since around 2004.
It wouldn't have mattered how you voted.
They had already knew how the election was going to turn out. . .
See, the thing is, they were encouraging "mail-in" voting as a distraction, it is the oldest illusionist magic trick in the book. It's called, "sleight of hand."
. . . and, given what has happened in the past, over the course of the last two decades, as nothing has happened to improve the system, and it is just the way that these folks have intended it to work.
Yeah, chances are, Biden will be President.
. . . and if he isn't? There is no way that Trump will be able to convince the brainwashed masses of the Deep State's clandestine fraud that was perpetrated otherwise. Trump will just look like a Strong man dictator, no better than Putin, Xi, or Kim Jong-un. IOW, ironically, everything they have been accusing him of being for years.
To help you gain clarity, this is some other writing from some other posts I have made on this issue;
"The point is. Polls, at this point, are a fairly tale. The NSA and silicon valley, with the use of meta -data and cell phones, already know how just about 95% or more of the population are going to vote, where they are going vote, and why they are going to vote on-- and what motivates them.
Polling is just an antiquated fairy tale, as is the "undecided voter."
The sophisticated algorithms they use now, can pretty much predict who these undecides are going to go for based on their behavior and media consumption, before even they do. Now, it is all about getting out the vote to make the election look legitimate. . . the folks controlling the whole scam will tweak it to get the results they want.
Not only can these sophisticated algorithms predict who folks are going to vote for, but, given what apps. folks use, they can also influence who they will vote for once they know their proclivities, by targeting them with certain content. IOW, polling? It is an illusion, and has been for the last decade, it is obsolete, except for among users that don't, or aren't dependent on tech. Unless they know what is going on, and withdraw from tech on purpose.
"The person that is the expert on this in our nation is Dr. Cynthia McKinney. She was a 6 time congress woman, member of the DNC progressive caucus, and member of the congressional black Caucus.
Even she maintains the Deep State has robbed Trump. How does she know? Because they started with her. . . .
These are links to a private lawsuit funded by poll watchers that she led me to. I do not know if it will see court before the vote is verified, but there are sworn exhibits by the former Secretary of State of Michigan.
By Mark E. Smith The most common activist strategies, such as street demonstrations, protests, etc., rarely seem to bring about any change in government. There is only one nonviolent tactic that ha…
deborralow.wordpress.com
"The most common activist strategies, such as street demonstrations, protests, etc., rarely seem to bring about any change in government. There is only one nonviolent tactic that has been proven to work. Recently I asked the new president of a local activist group that had banned me from speaking, if I would be allowed to speak under the new leadership. I explained that I’m an election boycott advocate. The reply I got was:
“So my question is – how does NOT voting change anything? I can see actually writing in someone you believe in – but not voting simply is giving up.”
I decided to answer the question as thoroughly as I could. Here’s what I wrote, which I’m posting here with the person’s name removed:
South Africa endured many years of violence under the Apartheid regime. Many people and countries worldwide boycotted Apartheid, but the US government insisted on supporting the Apartheid regime, saying that while the US abhorred Apartheid, the regime was the legitimate government of South Africa. Then the Apartheid regime held another election. No more than 7% of South Africans voted. Suddenly everything changed. No longer could the US or anyone else say that the Apartheid regime had the consent of the governed. That was when the regime began to make concessions. Suddenly the ANC, formerly considered to be a terrorist group trying to overthrow a legitimate government, became freedom fighters against an illegitimate government. It made all the difference in the world, something that decades more of violence could never have done.
In Cuba, when Fidel Castro’s small, ragged, tired band was in the mountains, the dictator Batista held an election (at the suggestion of the US, by the way). Only 10% of the population voted. Realizing that he had lost the support of 90% of the country, Batista fled. Castro then, knowing that he had the support of 90% of the country, proceeded to bring about a true revolution.
In Haiti, when the US and US-sponsored regimes removed the most popular party from the ballot, in many places only 3% voted. The US had to intervene militarily, kidnap Aristide, and withhold aid after the earthquake to continue to control Haiti, but nobody familiar with the situation thought that the US-backed Haitian government had the consent of the governed or was legitimate.
Boycotting elections alone will not oust the oligarchy, but it is the only proven non-violent way to delegitimize a government.
A lot of people here are complaining about the Citizens United decision. Some want to amend the Constitution because there is no appeal from a Supreme Court decision (their edicts have the same weight as the Divine Right of Kings), but getting enough states to ratify is a long drawn out and not always successful process, as I’m sure you recall from the ERA. But suppose that the corporations spent ten to fifteen billion dollars on an election (they spent at least five billion on the last midterms, so that’s not unreasonable) and almost nobody voted. Do you think their boards of directors would let them do it again?
Here are some of the most common canards that political party operatives use to argue against not voting:"
By Mark E. Smith The most common activist strategies, such as street demonstrations, protests, etc., rarely seem to bring about any change in government. There is only one nonviolent tactic that ha…
I think its almost official that we are indeed the F.U.S.A
The f standing for former
Guess who they wanna kill off first White American man.? ......
Why are you White Man Thier useful idiots center of thier irrational hatred ........for a reason
Thiers no reasoning or middle road ......tick tock tick tock tick tock
By Mark E. Smith The most common activist strategies, such as street demonstrations, protests, etc., rarely seem to bring about any change in government. There is only one nonviolent tactic that ha…
deborralow.wordpress.com
"The most common activist strategies, such as street demonstrations, protests, etc., rarely seem to bring about any change in government. There is only one nonviolent tactic that has been proven to work. Recently I asked the new president of a local activist group that had banned me from speaking, if I would be allowed to speak under the new leadership. I explained that I’m an election boycott advocate. The reply I got was:
“So my question is – how does NOT voting change anything? I can see actually writing in someone you believe in – but not voting simply is giving up.”
I decided to answer the question as thoroughly as I could. Here’s what I wrote, which I’m posting here with the person’s name removed:
South Africa endured many years of violence under the Apartheid regime. Many people and countries worldwide boycotted Apartheid, but the US government insisted on supporting the Apartheid regime, saying that while the US abhorred Apartheid, the regime was the legitimate government of South Africa. Then the Apartheid regime held another election. No more than 7% of South Africans voted. Suddenly everything changed. No longer could the US or anyone else say that the Apartheid regime had the consent of the governed. That was when the regime began to make concessions. Suddenly the ANC, formerly considered to be a terrorist group trying to overthrow a legitimate government, became freedom fighters against an illegitimate government. It made all the difference in the world, something that decades more of violence could never have done.
In Cuba, when Fidel Castro’s small, ragged, tired band was in the mountains, the dictator Batista held an election (at the suggestion of the US, by the way). Only 10% of the population voted. Realizing that he had lost the support of 90% of the country, Batista fled. Castro then, knowing that he had the support of 90% of the country, proceeded to bring about a true revolution.
In Haiti, when the US and US-sponsored regimes removed the most popular party from the ballot, in many places only 3% voted. The US had to intervene militarily, kidnap Aristide, and withhold aid after the earthquake to continue to control Haiti, but nobody familiar with the situation thought that the US-backed Haitian government had the consent of the governed or was legitimate.
Boycotting elections alone will not oust the oligarchy, but it is the only proven non-violent way to delegitimize a government.
A lot of people here are complaining about the Citizens United decision. Some want to amend the Constitution because there is no appeal from a Supreme Court decision (their edicts have the same weight as the Divine Right of Kings), but getting enough states to ratify is a long drawn out and not always successful process, as I’m sure you recall from the ERA. But suppose that the corporations spent ten to fifteen billion dollars on an election (they spent at least five billion on the last midterms, so that’s not unreasonable) and almost nobody voted. Do you think their boards of directors would let them do it again?
Here are some of the most common canards that political party operatives use to argue against not voting:"
By Mark E. Smith The most common activist strategies, such as street demonstrations, protests, etc., rarely seem to bring about any change in government. There is only one nonviolent tactic that ha…
There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative.
www.weforum.org
actual info on whats coming soon to every person on earth, please listen/read/watch. scary stuff!
It has already started. That is why they have these fake protesters to burned up their buildings in order to collect their insurance claim to rebuild. That is why the police let these protesters burned buildings.
But if any of you decided to commit insurance fraud like the way they have done. You'll be locked up and still they will take your home away.
Presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren said her administration would mandate that any new buildings built from 2028 onwards must be carbon neutral.
GreatReset is trending now, but no one is talking about the date it will be completed or the fact that it has ALREADY BEGUN. For viral content, in-depth insights and breaking news be sure to follow David Knight on Parler and Twitter @Libertytarian