JoeB131
Diamond Member
1) I'm not the one claiming what you claim.
2) You may be getting yours for nothing. I earn mine through what I offer to an employer. That's the difference.
There isn't a difference. Your employer is paying into a fund for you. (I actually buy my own insurance direct from an insurance company). But if you get sick next year, whatever you and your employer paid into it will be seriously outmatched by even moderate medical bills... that's the point. It's all collectivism.
We don't do it wrong. MY coverage, as part of my compensation, costs me nothing. The most I'll pay out of pocket is $750/year.
But that's my WHOLE POINT. you are only on the hook for $750 a year. Someone else is paying your way, you socialist commie piece of crap.
The state doesn't have a responsibility to those children. That would involve those that aren't the sperm donor paying for children they didn't produce. The responsibility lies with those producing those children. If they can't or won't, let bleeding hearts like Joe voluntarily do it and prove he has the compassion he claims.
Actually, the responsibility lies with the guy whose name was on the birth certificate... that's the law, buddy.
What kind of sick fuck thinks someone that isn't the baby daddy should be financially responsible for something that is that of the actual sperm donor?
There's more to being a father than sperm, bud. Just ask the thousands of dads who've adopted children or taken on responsibility as a step parent.
The point is, the child didn't do anything wrong here, and Vasty's friend (I would never have a person like this in a circle of friends) is kind of an awful person turning his back on his child.