the law says a human corpse,,
what do you think a corpse is??
Definition of CORPSE
a human or animal body whether living or dead; a dead body especially of a human being; the remains of something discarded or defunct… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
californiaglobe.com
law.meta.stackexchange.com
words and their meanings have been around a lot longer tha laws,,Yes they do. You continue to show your stupidity.
The Use of Definitions in Legislation – California Globe
And as usual the reprehensible right attempts to defend the indefensible.
words and their meanings have been around a lot longer tha laws,,Yes they do. You continue to show your stupidity.
The Use of Definitions in Legislation – California Globe
shut up baby killer,,
The lawyer for the defendant. That might be the only argument they have. But, the word is subject to ordinary definition. The argument will fail. The law does not define woman, man, mother or father.
Anyone who thinks a 22 week old fetus is not human is just wrong. If it's not human what is the species.Yes they do. You continue to show your stupidity.
The Use of Definitions in Legislation – California Globe
Many states have different definitions of a trespasser. They define it in each statute for clarity.
"It is often the case that am particular law defines a particular term for the purposes of that law. For example, US copyright law defines "derivative work", and the US ADA defines "disability". US federal and Maryland state law both define "debt collector" and the definitions differ significantly. "Employment" is defined differently in the law of agency, and in tax law (copyright law follows the law of agency here). Fire and building codes often define a host of technical terms. The same is true in laws of other nations."
Is there no role for law in defining what words mean?
In a comment justifying the closure of a question that asked for definition of terms used by auto manufacturers, a user said: There is no role for the law in defining what words mean Is this corr...
When it says "abuse of a corpse" the law MUST define a corpse, especially when it can be something vague like "a dead human" and yet some can think a 22 week old baby is not a human.
codes.ohio.gov
There is no way a corpse can be described as anything other than dead, the only thing the defense can fall back on is the corpse describes human remains and a dead fetus is not human.
of course you can back that up with something from the law books??
we are all dumber after reading your words,,
There are ghouls sitting around in right wing think tanks just waiting for a case like this to test the limits of the law in their endless pursuit to strip women of their agency.
Answer the question, shitass.
its being prosecuted because she dumped the body of her child in a bucket and left it outside,,
She had a miscarriage. You're prosecuting someone who HAD A MISCARRIAGE YOU FUCKING GHOUL.
they are prosecuting her for abuse of a corpse you fucking idiot,,
Any woman in Texas, Ohio or other Red States that passed these barbaric anti abortion laws is taking her life into her hands. What happened to that woman in Texas who had to leave the state can happen to ANY woman who gets pregnant.
