presonorek
Gold Member
Is it true that your Constitutional rights cannot be violated at all? or
Is it true that your Constitutional rights cannot be violated without due process?
This is just something I have started considering recently. Is there even a difference between these two concepts? To me one says your Constitutional rights can never be violated. One says that your Constitutional rights can only be violated by a judge. Has anybody ever considered what "without due process" actually means?
Is it true that your Constitutional rights cannot be violated without due process?
This is just something I have started considering recently. Is there even a difference between these two concepts? To me one says your Constitutional rights can never be violated. One says that your Constitutional rights can only be violated by a judge. Has anybody ever considered what "without due process" actually means?