With the 4th largest proven oil reserves what is Iran's need for "peaceful purposes" nuclear program

[LogikAndReazon]

The folks who believe that the persians only goal is for peaceful , energy alternatives are either willfully ignorant or seek the rise of Americas enemies.

Everyone knows the parasites of which I refer to...... Lol

 

[g5000]

....and what is the purpose of giving them 11 billion dollars back? They'll disburse that money to other terrorist organizations...we're helping fund islamic global terror.

Before the sanctions are lifted, Iran will have to destroy 98 percent of its enriched uranium, and all of its 5 to 20 percent enriched uranium, end all enrichment at Fordow, and remove more than two thirds of their centrifuges, including all their advanced centrifuges.

The IAEA must certify these conditions have been met before the sanctions can be lifted.

From the following report:
Iran: U.S. Economic Sanctions and the Authority to Lift Restrictions

Dianne E. Rennack

Specialist in Foreign Policy Legislation

from page 4......
"To lift the majority of the economic sanctions imposed by CISADA, the President must determine and certify that the government of Iran no longer supports acts of international terrorism.

And here is how the President would determine and certify...

The President holds the authority to remove the designation of any country from the terrorist list. Though each of the three laws provides slightly different procedures, the authority to delist Iran resides with the President, and generally requires him to find that

• there has been a fundamental change in the leadership and policies of the government;
• the government is not supporting acts of international terrorism; and
• the government has assured that it will not support terrorism in the future.
  
  https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/R43311.pdf
  
  Not the IAEA OK????

You obviously have not read the agreement.

And sanctions are dual-pronged. There are sanctions related to the nuclear program, and sanctions related to terrorism.

You asked about the nuclear program.

 

[Claudette]

You are an idiot.

What other country has threatened to use nuclear weapons?? None except for Iran.

North Korea is another country no one will trust with a nuke.

The fact that many countries have them doesn't mean anything. Any country having nuclear weapons does everything they can do to not need them. The threat of them is more than enough.

Grow the fuck up.

The U.S. has been proven to be a far more dangerous violent country than Iran. In the last 30yrs alone, how many countries has the U.S. invaded and how many people has it slaughtered in the process? Now compare that with Iran. So who has the more just argument for Nuclear capabilities? Something to ponder, no?

How many countries have we used a nuke on??

Something to ponder. No??

One. and the context is how many since that one? We've had wars and have never used the nuke option since.

Tactical nukes will be used one day. They will NOT destroy the world.

You are right. The only bomb ever used was the one against Japan to end WW II. And that was an Atom bomb and it was an eye opener for the world.

I believe you are right on the tactical nukes as well and no, they won't destroy the world.

 

[bendog]

Well, if I'm an Iranian, Bushii's misadventures in Iraq would give me pause.

Why? Bush is no longer in charge. Or do you believe Iranian leaders are too stupid to know this tid bit?

Oh, the neocons are leading the opposition to the Iran deal. If you think Cheney's had a wooden stake through his undead heart, you are mistaken. Jeb's more than up to the job. Huckleberry would usher in the reign of the Beast.

 

[g5000]

Full text of the Iran nuclear deal

There is the full text of the agreement. Read it instead of drinking the piss poured for you by your hack partisan media masters. Stop being mindless parrots of lies.

Here are all the things Iran must do before EU, UN, and US sanctions can be lifted:

Iran will implement the nuclear-related measures as specified in Annex I:
15. Paragraphs 3 and 10 from Section B on "Arak Heavy Water Research Reactor";
15. Paragraphs 14 and 15 from Section C on "Heavy Water Production Plant";
15. Paragraphs 27, 28, 29, 29.1 and 29.2 from Section F on "Enrichment Capacity";
15. Paragraphs 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42 from Section G on "Centrifuges Research and Development";
15. Paragraphs 45, 46, 46.1, 46.2, 47.1, 48.1 from Section H on "Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant";
15. Paragraphs 52, 54 and 55 from Section I on "Other Aspects of Enrichment";
15. Paragraphs 57 and 58 from Section J on "Uranium Stocks and Fuels";
15. Paragraph 62 from Section K on "Centrifuge Manufacturing";
15. Complete the modalities and facilities-specific arrangements to allow the IAEA to implement all transparency measures provided for in Annex I;
15. Paragraphs 64 and 65 from Section L on "Additional Protocol and Modified Code 3.1";
15. Paragraphs 80.1 and 80.2 from Section R on "Centrifuge Component Manufacturing Transparency"; and
15. Within one year from Implementation Day, Iran will have completed the measures specified in paragraphs 47.2 and 48.2 of Section H on "Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant".

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Imagine, with enough "enforcement" of these magnificent treaties by the UN and obama adm how contained Iran will be...... Lmfao

 

[g5000]

I believe the OP has been answered. Iran has nuclear power because the less oil and gas they burn for electricity, the more oil and gas they have for export.

They also sell electricity to neighboring states.

Simple.

We done here?

 

[LogikAndReazon]

The empty promises and laughable accountabilty will gurantee Irans development of nuclear weapons.

Alas, another country will ensure they are never able to be used...

Thanks Israel !

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Iran, leading the way in Earths preservation and "sustainability". !!!

Fucking precious

 

[paulitician]

You are an idiot.

What other country has threatened to use nuclear weapons?? None except for Iran.

North Korea is another country no one will trust with a nuke.

The fact that many countries have them doesn't mean anything. Any country having nuclear weapons does everything they can do to not need them. The threat of them is more than enough.

Grow the fuck up.

The U.S. has been proven to be a far more dangerous violent country than Iran. In the last 30yrs alone, how many countries has the U.S. invaded and how many people has it slaughtered in the process? Now compare that with Iran. So who has the more just argument for Nuclear capabilities? Something to ponder, no?

How many countries have we used a nuke on??

Something to ponder. No??

The U.S. is by far the most dangerous violent nation on earth. Iran couldn't match its brutality if it tried. Yet is the U.S. gonna give up its Nukes anytime soon?

 

[paulitician]

The U.S. has been proven to be a far more dangerous violent country than Iran. In the last 30yrs alone, how many countries has the U.S. invaded and how many people has it slaughtered in the process? Now compare that with Iran. So who has the more just argument for Nuclear capabilities? Something to ponder, no?

Nonsense.

Try Afghanistan. All they had to do was hand over the 9/11 terrorists

al qaeda and ISIS are American creations. Iran despises them. Next...

Responses......not creations.

U.S. Intelligence has funded & armed radical Islamists for several decades. WikiLeaks showed the CIA admitting it, even boasting about it. al Qaeda and ISIS wouldn't be what they are without American support.

Countries like Russia and Iran warned us not to intervene in Syria. But of course we didn't listen. And now we have ISIS wreaking havoc all over the Middle East. Most Americans don't wanna accept these things, but it is the reality.

 

[Claudette]

You are an idiot.

What other country has threatened to use nuclear weapons?? None except for Iran.

North Korea is another country no one will trust with a nuke.

The fact that many countries have them doesn't mean anything. Any country having nuclear weapons does everything they can do to not need them. The threat of them is more than enough.

Grow the fuck up.

The U.S. has been proven to be a far more dangerous violent country than Iran. In the last 30yrs alone, how many countries has the U.S. invaded and how many people has it slaughtered in the process? Now compare that with Iran. So who has the more just argument for Nuclear capabilities? Something to ponder, no?

How many countries have we used a nuke on??

Something to ponder. No??

The U.S. is by far the most dangerous violent nation on earth. Iran couldn't match its brutality if it tried. Yet is the U.S. gonna give up its Nukes anytime soon?

No one will give up nukes. They are the best deterrent out there.

The problem comes when a country decides they will use them instead of just threaten with them.

Iran has already stated many times that they will kill every Jew they can in Israel and we of course are still the great satan.

If you are so stupid as to think the religious jihadist supporting mullahs won't pull the trigger then there is no hope for you at all.

 

[paulitician]

al qaeda and ISIS are American creations. Iran despises them. Next...

"Nuts!" to quote a famous American military commander

Facts matter

Iran despises al Qaeda and ISIS. They warned us not to intervene in Syria. ISIS was created by American, Saudi, and British Intelligence. It was created to kill Assad. Now Iran is forced to clean up our awful mess.

 

[Dante]

Well, if I'm an Iranian, Bushii's misadventures in Iraq would give me pause.

Why? Bush is no longer in charge. Or do you believe Iranian leaders are too stupid to know this tid bit?

Oh, the neocons are leading the opposition to the Iran deal. If you think Cheney's had a wooden stake through his undead heart, you are mistaken. Jeb's more than up to the job. Huckleberry would usher in the reign of the Beast.

The neocons here are like the reactionary wing of the Mullahs over there. Both sides have reactionaries running the opposition. What is your point?

 

[paulitician]

You are an idiot.

What other country has threatened to use nuclear weapons?? None except for Iran.

North Korea is another country no one will trust with a nuke.

The fact that many countries have them doesn't mean anything. Any country having nuclear weapons does everything they can do to not need them. The threat of them is more than enough.

Grow the fuck up.

The U.S. has been proven to be a far more dangerous violent country than Iran. In the last 30yrs alone, how many countries has the U.S. invaded and how many people has it slaughtered in the process? Now compare that with Iran. So who has the more just argument for Nuclear capabilities? Something to ponder, no?

How many countries have we used a nuke on??

Something to ponder. No??

The U.S. is by far the most dangerous violent nation on earth. Iran couldn't match its brutality if it tried. Yet is the U.S. gonna give up its Nukes anytime soon?

No one will give up nukes. They are the best deterrent out there.

The problem comes when a country decides they will use them instead of just threaten with them.

Iran has already stated many times that they will kill every Jew they can in Israel and we of course are still the great satan.

If you are so stupid as to think the religious jihadist supporting mullahs won't pull the trigger then there is no hope for you at all.

Why does Israel have Nukes? Seems to be a pretty big double standard going on. Several nations have Nuclear Weapons. Why not Iran? You have to see how Iran sees this.

 

[healthmyths]

I believe the OP has been answered. Iran has nuclear power because the less oil and gas they burn for electricity, the more oil and gas they have for export.

They also sell electricity to neighboring states.

Simple.

We done here?

I don't think you any grasp of Iran's oil and gas reserves so that they don't NEED nuclear utilities
Iran's proven oil reserves: 154.58 billion.
Iranian production peaked at 2.19 billion a year... or 70 years.
Iran has the world's largest reserves of natural gas (17.9% of the world's total); these are exploited primarily for domestic use.[23] It contains an estimated 1,187.3 trillion cubic feet (33,620 km3) (Tcf) in proven natural gas reserve
Based on Iran's consumption per year of 3.6 trillion cubic feet Iran has 330 years of natural gas.
Energy in Iran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So tell me again why with the 4th largest oil and the largest gas is Iran needing nuclear utilities.

Plus tell me why they are creating nuclear power plants with old fashion uranium when:
Thorium Power Is the Safer Future of Nuclear Energy
Conventional nuclear power using a fuel cycle involving uranium-235 and/or plutonium-239 was seen as killing two birds with one stone: reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil, and creating the fuel needed for nuclear bombs. Thorium power, on the other hand, didn’t have military potential. And by decreasing the need for conventional nuclear power, a potentially successful thorium program would have actually been seen as threatening to U.S. interests in the Cold War environment.
Thorium Power Is the Safer Future of Nuclear Energy

So again the question is why is Iran so bent on nuclear power using uranium when:
A) they have all the energy enough in oil/ (4th largest) and gas (the largest... over 330 years own supply)
B) They can increase electricity efficiency by 10% alone with out any need to increase utilities.
C) Why are they using uranium when Thorium is safer?

ANSWER: They want nuclear weapons that uranium provides and they don't need nuclear power plants!

 

[Dante]

al qaeda and ISIS are American creations. Iran despises them. Next...

"Nuts!" to quote a famous American military commander

Facts matter

Iran despises al Qaeda and ISIS. They warned us not to intervene in Syria. ISIS was created by American, Saudi, and British Intelligence. It was created to kill Assad. Now Iran is forced to clean up our awful mess.

This has bridged into conspiracy territory.

This thread does NOT belong in the politics forum

 

[healthmyths]

You are an idiot.

What other country has threatened to use nuclear weapons?? None except for Iran.

North Korea is another country no one will trust with a nuke.

The fact that many countries have them doesn't mean anything. Any country having nuclear weapons does everything they can do to not need them. The threat of them is more than enough.

Grow the fuck up.

The U.S. has been proven to be a far more dangerous violent country than Iran. In the last 30yrs alone, how many countries has the U.S. invaded and how many people has it slaughtered in the process? Now compare that with Iran. So who has the more just argument for Nuclear capabilities? Something to ponder, no?

How many countries have we used a nuke on??

Something to ponder. No??

The U.S. is by far the most dangerous violent nation on earth. Iran couldn't match its brutality if it tried. Yet is the U.S. gonna give up its Nukes anytime soon?

No one will give up nukes. They are the best deterrent out there.

The problem comes when a country decides they will use them instead of just threaten with them.

Iran has already stated many times that they will kill every Jew they can in Israel and we of course are still the great satan.

If you are so stupid as to think the religious jihadist supporting mullahs won't pull the trigger then there is no hope for you at all.

Why does Israel have Nukes? Seems to be a pretty big double standard going on. Several nations have Nuclear Weapons. Why not Iran? You have to see how Iran sees this.

Well for one thing I've not heard ONE Israeli leader call for the destruction of Iran. Not one.
When was the last time you heard of Israeli terrorists in foreign countries blowing up buildings... EVERYDAY EVERYWHERE!!!

 

[g5000]

[Based on Iran's consumption per year of 3.6 trillion cubic feet Iran has 330 years of natural gas.

Which is exactly why they are a big exporter. If they don't use it, they can sell it.

So tell me again why with the 4th largest oil and the largest gas is Iran needing nuclear utilities.

Okay. The less oil and gas they burn, the less they are using. The less they use, the more they can sell to other countries. For money.

I thought I used the smallest words possible, so even you could understand.


Let me know which words you do not understand.

 

[healthmyths]

al qaeda and ISIS are American creations. Iran despises them. Next...

"Nuts!" to quote a famous American military commander

Facts matter

Iran despises al Qaeda and ISIS. They warned us not to intervene in Syria. ISIS was created by American, Saudi, and British Intelligence. It was created to kill Assad. Now Iran is forced to clean up our awful mess.

This has bridged into conspiracy territory.

This thread does NOT belong in the politics forum

OK then explain why Obama except for his "political legacy" is there a need for Iran to use uranium to build nuclear utilities when Iran as the world's largest reserves of natural gas and 4th largest oil...AND they inefficiently waste 18% of electricity they produce?
Why does Obama want Iran to have uranium ? Any other explanation???