"Across the board spending cuts" don't work because they make things much, much worse for people at the bottom of the income scale. That's what they did with the "Sequester" spending bill when Republicans retook the House under Obama. Nobody was happy with the result, but it did have the desired effect of slowing the recovery, which is what Republicans wanted to do to ensure Obama was a one term President.
Cut your bloated Defense Department budget. This budget has been supporting the exorbitant expenses associated with equipping and maintaining battlefield forces for the past 20 years. Cut the budget and call it a "peace dividend". Imagine if all of the money wasted in Iraq and Afghanistan had been spent on American infrastructure, education and health care over the past 20 years.
Cut the bloated corporate subsidies. This notion that Kansas will pay a corporation to move to that state and steal jobs from Washington or California is beyond ridiculous. There's a book out called "race to the bottom", and tax credits and free infrastructure to lure corporations to your state over another state are ridiculous.
The residents of Wisconsin would have paid $754 per person - every man, woman and child, to Foxxcom to bring that company to the state. This was the cost of "incentives" offered, and then it turned out that it was all a scam. Foxxcom has been going around the world getting "incentives" from governments to build facilities, but has yet to build a facility.
New York residents, in one of the last affordable boroughs of the city, would have paid $9 billion to build the infrastructure and services that Amazon needed. The net result would have been the destruction of their neighbourhood. Jeff Bezos doesn't need to be getting $9 billion in capital improvements on top of not paying ANY income taxes, either personally or through Amazon, to the government which is making him the wealthiest man on the planet.
This is outrageous.