Windmills create warming

[elektra]

Visible light - which is converted by solar panels into electricity - isn't heat.

And the portion of visible light not converted into electricity is dissipated as heat.

Try to catch up Ding cause solar panels create heat another way as well

 

[ding]

Physics says you dropped out after the first week.

100% of the visible light is not converted to electricity. Where does the rest go Einstein

I'm happy presenting facts while you attack my character because I believe it reveals your character.

It doesn't matter that solar panels do not capture 100% of the photons that make up visible light. It only matters that that photons it does convert into electricity reduces the number of photons that would have struck the surface. Which is why satellites measured a localized cooling effect above the six solar farms they measured.

 

[elektra]

Do you believe there is no GHG effect from an incremental 120 ppm of CO2?

Yes, 120ppm loss of co2 would cause extreme conditions for the human race. Not being able to grow food is detrimental.

 

[ding]

Yes, 120ppm loss of co2 would cause extreme conditions for the human race. Not being able to grow food is detrimental.

You didn't answer the question. Do YOU believe that an incremental increase of 120 ppm of atmospheric CO2 has no incremental GHG effect?

 

[ding]

Yes, 120ppm loss of co2 would cause extreme conditions for the human race. Not being able to grow food is detrimental.

A 120 ppm decrease in atmospheric CO2 from today's level would not affect the food supply and at most would decrease surface temperatures by 0.5 C. So no, it would not cause extreme extreme conditions for the human race.

 

[elektra]

I'm happy presenting facts while you attack my character because I believe it reveals your character.

Ah, your feelings got hurt. You did not present facts, you linked to researchgate which is ran by democrats

 

[ding]

Ah, your feelings got hurt. You did not present facts, you linked to researchgate which is ran by democrats

Not at all. You just need to see it that way. You could really benefit from studying up on transactional analysis.

 

[marvin martian]

Yet another in a long line of Reich Wing Conspiracy Wing Nut sites for Reich Wing Conspiracy Nut Jobs.

Find a better brand of bullshit to peddle. Windmills generate power, they do NOT cause cancer. Take Holland asshole, wind mills everywhere, explain their low cancer rate.

You're too dumb to answer this question, but it's a good time to ask if you know how much concrete is required to anchor a commercial wind turbine, where that concrete comes from, how it's made, and how it's transported to the site?

 

[ding]

you linked to researchgate which is ran by democrats

I linked to a scientific study that used satellites to measure temperatures before and after six solar farms were installed. That study found a localized cooling effect because any solar radiation that is converted into electricity is solar radiation that did not heat the surface of the planet. For some odd reason you think a localized cooling effect is a good thing. It's not. It's a really really bad thing for mankind.

 

[Manonthestreet]

why do y

Yet another in a long line of Reich Wing Conspiracy Wing Nut sites for Reich Wing Conspiracy Nut Jobs.

Find a better brand of bullshit to peddle. Windmills generate power, they do NOT cause cancer. Take Holland asshole, wind mills everywhere, explain their low cancer rate.

Toxic Blade Time Bomb - WIND CONCERNS

Big Wind's "tobacco" industry moment...

www.windconcerns.com

 

[ding]

And the portion of visible light not converted into electricity is dissipated as heat.

Try to catch up Ding cause solar panels create heat another way as well

Would you like to debate this in the Bull Ring with me? Because I'm about two seconds away from creating a call out thread. Pop off again.

 

[elektra]

A 120 ppm decrease in atmospheric CO2 from today's level would not affect the food supply and at most would decrease surface temperatures by 0.5 C. So no, it would not cause extreme extreme conditions for the human race.

You are pretty dimwitted, a .5 degree drop is okay but a .5 degree rise is detrimental?

A 30% drop in co2 wont hurt photosynthesis? You know that process which plants use to produce food.

Less co2 makes no difference but more does? Nothing personal ding because it is impossible for me to know you personally. Your reasoning is dimwitted

 

[ding]

You are pretty dimwitted, a .5 degree drop is okay but a .5 degree rise is detrimental?

A 30% drop in co2 wont hurt photosynthesis? You know that process which plants use to produce food.

Less co2 makes no difference but more does? Nothing personal ding because it is impossible for me to know you personally. Your reasoning is dimwitted

If I'm pretty dimwitted, then it's not looking good for you.

I never said a 0.5C rise in temperatures is detrimental. Neither is a 0.5C decrease in temperatures.

Correct, a 30% drop in CO2 does not reach the level which halts photosynthesis. That threshold is ~150 ppm of atmospheric CO2.

I'm still waiting to hear you tell me that increasing levels of CO2 has no impact on the GHG effect. You seem to be avoiding that.

Are you ready to go to the Bull Ring?

 

[ding]

You are pretty dimwitted, a .5 degree drop is okay but a .5 degree rise is detrimental?

A 30% drop in co2 wont hurt photosynthesis? You know that process which plants use to produce food.

Less co2 makes no difference but more does? Nothing personal ding because it is impossible for me to know you personally. Your reasoning is dimwitted

I bet you are the kind of guy that denies the sea level is rising too. Am I right?

 

[elektra]

You didn't answer the question. Do YOU believe that an incremental increase of 120 ppm of atmospheric CO2 has no incremental GHG effect?

Grow up. You are deflecting trying to get me to chase your tail

 

[elektra]

A 120 ppm decrease in atmospheric CO2 from today's level would not affect the food supply and at most would decrease surface temperatures by 0.5 C. So no, it would not cause extreme extreme conditions for the human race.

Yes it will

 

[ding]

Grow up. You are deflecting trying to get me to chase your tail

Actually I am trying to get you to deny the GHG effect.

 

[elektra]

I linked to a scientific study that

Researchgate is what you linked to. There is no scientific study on researchgates site. I was right when I said you are delusional

 

[ding]

Yes it will

How so?

 

[ding]

Researchgate is what you linked to. There is no scientific study on researchgates site. I was right when I said you are delusional

I linked to a study. You ready to go to the bull ring?