Wind Power, is Germany waking up to no lights on?

elektra

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
35,541
Reaction score
20,949
Points
1,880
Location
Jewitt City, Connecticut
Wind Energy, too little too late or too much. This is a nice article explaining the problems with building more wind turbines. They are expensive, land intensive, intermittent, etc..

Thank God Trump is putting an end to this madness. The great part of this, as long as Germany continues their quest to be Green, German Industry will be moving to the USA.

The fundamental problem, according to Prof. Kobe, lies in the nature of weather-dependent energy. Wind power does not scale linearly in a way that guarantees supply. During a lull, when there is no wind, it doesn’t matter if you have 30,000 or 60,000 turbines. The output remains zero. Doubling the capacity does nothing to solve the problem of “Dunkelflaute” (dark doldrums).

Conversely, under windy weather, the existing turbines often produce much more electricity than the grid can handle. Adding even more turbines during these periods only increases the surplus that cannot be used, leading to forced shutdowns.

Building “useless” capacity

Kobe argues that Germany is rapidly approaching a “saturation point.” Data shows that while the installed capacity (the theoretical maximum) of wind power has grown significantly, the actual amount of electricity fed into the grid hasn’t kept pace.

We are essentially building “useless” capacity that only produces power when we already have too much of it, while failing to provide any power when we actually need it.

Economic fallout: paying for nothing​

This paradox isn’t just a physical problem; it’s an expensive economic one.

1766351186131.webp
 
Wind Energy, too little too late or too much. This is a nice article explaining the problems with building more wind turbines. They are expensive, land intensive, intermittent, etc..

Thank God Trump is putting an end to this madness. The great part of this, as long as Germany continues their quest to be Green, German Industry will be moving to the USA.

The fundamental problem, according to Prof. Kobe, lies in the nature of weather-dependent energy. Wind power does not scale linearly in a way that guarantees supply. During a lull, when there is no wind, it doesn’t matter if you have 30,000 or 60,000 turbines. The output remains zero. Doubling the capacity does nothing to solve the problem of “Dunkelflaute” (dark doldrums).

Conversely, under windy weather, the existing turbines often produce much more electricity than the grid can handle. Adding even more turbines during these periods only increases the surplus that cannot be used, leading to forced shutdowns.

Building “useless” capacity

Kobe argues that Germany is rapidly approaching a “saturation point.” Data shows that while the installed capacity (the theoretical maximum) of wind power has grown significantly, the actual amount of electricity fed into the grid hasn’t kept pace.

We are essentially building “useless” capacity that only produces power when we already have too much of it, while failing to provide any power when we actually need it.

Economic fallout: paying for nothing​

This paradox isn’t just a physical problem; it’s an expensive economic one.

View attachment 1196488
Wind is unsustainable and it isn’t “green”. The materials used to make those are detrimental to the environment, and they need to be replaced every 10 to 15 years. Plus they kill so many birds.

Anther green energy hoax from the left so they can feel virtuous, since they devoid of so many virtues.
 
Germans are burning lignite, the dirtiest form of coal, to keep the lights on.

One can only hope that the characteristically smart Germans will soon get their heads out of their asses. Reopen their mothballed nuke plants, look into hydraulic fracturing technology, and things like that.
 
Wind Energy, too little too late or too much. This is a nice article explaining the problems with building more wind turbines. They are expensive, land intensive, intermittent, etc..

Thank God Trump is putting an end to this madness. The great part of this, as long as Germany continues their quest to be Green, German Industry will be moving to the USA.

The fundamental problem, according to Prof. Kobe, lies in the nature of weather-dependent energy. Wind power does not scale linearly in a way that guarantees supply. During a lull, when there is no wind, it doesn’t matter if you have 30,000 or 60,000 turbines. The output remains zero. Doubling the capacity does nothing to solve the problem of “Dunkelflaute” (dark doldrums).

Conversely, under windy weather, the existing turbines often produce much more electricity than the grid can handle. Adding even more turbines during these periods only increases the surplus that cannot be used, leading to forced shutdowns.

Building “useless” capacity

Kobe argues that Germany is rapidly approaching a “saturation point.” Data shows that while the installed capacity (the theoretical maximum) of wind power has grown significantly, the actual amount of electricity fed into the grid hasn’t kept pace.

We are essentially building “useless” capacity that only produces power when we already have too much of it, while failing to provide any power when we actually need it.

Economic fallout: paying for nothing​

This paradox isn’t just a physical problem; it’s an expensive economic one.

View attachment 1196488

More expensive, less reliable, harming poor Germans.

Brilliant!
 
Europeans are on a par dumb with America's woke liberals.

They'll keep throwing good money after bad as long as it is sold to them as a solution to problems that don't exist.
 
Wind Energy, too little too late or too much. This is a nice article explaining the problems with building more wind turbines. They are expensive, land intensive, intermittent, etc..

Thank God Trump is putting an end to this madness. The great part of this, as long as Germany continues their quest to be Green, German Industry will be moving to the USA.

The fundamental problem, according to Prof. Kobe, lies in the nature of weather-dependent energy. Wind power does not scale linearly in a way that guarantees supply. During a lull, when there is no wind, it doesn’t matter if you have 30,000 or 60,000 turbines. The output remains zero. Doubling the capacity does nothing to solve the problem of “Dunkelflaute” (dark doldrums).

Conversely, under windy weather, the existing turbines often produce much more electricity than the grid can handle. Adding even more turbines during these periods only increases the surplus that cannot be used, leading to forced shutdowns.

Building “useless” capacity

Kobe argues that Germany is rapidly approaching a “saturation point.” Data shows that while the installed capacity (the theoretical maximum) of wind power has grown significantly, the actual amount of electricity fed into the grid hasn’t kept pace.

We are essentially building “useless” capacity that only produces power when we already have too much of it, while failing to provide any power when we actually need it.

Economic fallout: paying for nothing​

This paradox isn’t just a physical problem; it’s an expensive economic one.

View attachment 1196488
Some people have to learn things the hard way.
 
If they deported all their Muslim refugees, they'd reduce CO2
That's as dumb as you arguing replacing fossil fuels with solar would change waste heat from electricity usage. Those Muslims would take their carbon footprint with them. So the carbon footprint didn't change. Just like the waste heat from electricity usage wouldn't change just because you changed the source of electricity.
 
That's as dumb as you arguing replacing fossil fuels with solar would change waste heat from electricity usage. Those Muslims would take their carbon footprint with them. So the carbon footprint didn't change. Just like the waste heat from electricity usage wouldn't change just because you changed the source of electricity.

Those Muslims would take their carbon footprint with them. So the carbon footprint didn't change.


Their carbon footprint in their shithole is much lower than their carbon footprint in a western nation.

DURR
 
That's as dumb as you arguing replacing fossil fuels with solar would change waste heat from electricity usage. Those Muslims would take their carbon footprint with them. So the carbon footprint didn't change. Just like the waste heat from electricity usage wouldn't change just because you changed the source of electricity.


1767201336242.webp



1767201374496.webp



Now tell me more about your plan to lower the Earth's albedo to trigger glacier expansion.
 
View attachment 1199833


View attachment 1199836


Now tell me more about your plan to lower the Earth's albedo to trigger glacier expansion.
That's nice. Do you have one for Muslims in Germany?
 
That's nice. Do you have one for Muslims in Germany?

I guess they'd be higher than the number back in Syria but probably lower than a typical German.
Depending on how much welfare they're receiving.

If Germany builds a road with 0.10 albedo, does that cool the planet?
 
I guess they'd be higher than the number back in Syria but probably lower than a typical German.
Depending on how much welfare they're receiving.

If Germany builds a road with 0.10 albedo, does that cool the planet?
So glad you acknowledged the flaw in using averages.
 
15th post
Germany has become a fundamentally retarded country.
 
Back
Top Bottom