Will you accept the election results regardless of who wins?

[XponentialChaos]

It doesn't matter who wins.

Why the hell should I care?

You asked me how it’s different when Democrats do it. I answered. It’s not. Both sides do it. We’re a nation of sore loser crybabies, as I indicated in the OP.

 

[Rogue AI]

Yes.

Now to the poll question that you dodged…

Define 'accept'.

 

[Billy000]

Will you accept the election results regardless of who wins?

It’s time for Americans to grow up and accept the reality that your favorite candidate isn’t always going to win. We’re a nation of sore losers who will only accept the results that we like and claim that the election is rigged when our side doesn’t win.

Stop it.

I trust our democratic process and I will accept the results of the election regardless of who wins. Will you? A or B.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4883703-2024-election-results-distrust-survey/

Yes because I am not a childish, whiny, sore loser little *****.

 

[Foxfyre]

Sure you do.

When is the last time you questioned the legitimacy of a Republican who won?

I hated hated HATED the media and Democrats saying GWB was selected, not elected.
I resented it mightily when the media and Democrats called Trump an illegitimate President.

It isn't a matter of what I question. It is a matter of the people being reasonably certain an election was as fair, honest, accurate as we can make it. I was happy when GWB won. I was happy when Trump won. But both would have had much more pleasant experiences, as would we all, if those elections hadn't been so harshly criticized by the Democrats.

And, if the people trusted their elections, there would have been no J6.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Define 'accept'.

Accept: believe that the person who wins the presidency legitimately won the election.

 

[Billy000]

lol republicans are too big of pussies to actually answer this poll question

 

[XponentialChaos]

I hated hated HATED the media and Democrats saying GWB was selected, not elected.
I resented it mightily when the media and Democrats called Trump an illegitimate President.

It isn't a matter of what I question. It is a matter of the people being reasonably certain an election was as fair, honest, accurate as we can make it. I was happy when GWB won. I was happy when Trump won. But both would have had much more pleasant experiences, as would we all, if those elections hadn't been so harshly criticized by the Democrats.

So you’ve never once questioned the legitimacy of a Republican who won, only when Democrats win.

Great. Now that we have that cleared up:

You will accept the election results if your side wins. You will question the results if your side loses.

So B.

 

[sartre play]

I confirm that I hate Democrats guts. That filth will be defeated.

Hate of people you don't even know, Calling the guy down the street filth? Who told you too hate others?
Politicians either side, worried more about their pay check, their fame, & their party, More than the people.
That would seem a better stance. Vote for AMERICA, NOT AGAINEST IT.

 

[MisterBeale]

And, if the people trusted their elections, there would have been no J6.

. . . but somehow only when the right protests is it a, "threat to democracy."

.

Anti-Trump protesters march for 3rd night; Portland police call it a 'riot' | CNN

Thousands protesting Donald Trump's victory in the presidential election took to the streets for a third night of demonstrations and vigils in several US cities.

www.cnn.com

 

[Foxfyre]

So you’ve never once questioned the legitimacy of a Republican who won, only when Democrats win.

Great. Now that we have that cleared up:

You will accept the election results if your side wins. You will question the results if your side loses.

So B.

I stand by my previous posts and reject your attempt to define me or what I have questioned or what I will and will not accept. Do have a lovely afternoon.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I stand by my previous posts and reject your attempt to define me or what I have questioned or what I will and will not accept. Do have a lovely afternoon.

You claim that you would feel the same if Republicans win, yet you admit that you have never questioned the legitimacy of a Republican who won. Not once. You have only questioned the legitimacy of the results when Democrats win. What a magical coincidence that is.

Sounds to me like you lack self-awareness. You accept the results of the election you win. For the elections you lose, your right-wing media tells you that the results were not legitimate, so you believe that. Therefore, you will accept the elections results you win and you will question the election results you lose.

See ya, B.

 

[MisterBeale]

lol republicans are too big of pussies to actually answer this poll question

Because they are more grounded in reality, and better informed now?

How to Rig an Election​

How to Rig an Election

An engrossing guide to fraudulent elections around the world—fully updated to mark the biggest election year in history in 2024, as over four billion peopl...

yalebooks.yale.edu

POL S 220 A: How to Steal an Election​

POL S 220 A: How to Steal an Election | Department of Political Science | University of Washington

Surveys the many strategies political actors use to rig elections and undermine electoral integrity and security in modern democracies.

www.polisci.washington.edu

 

[Foxfyre]

. . . but somehow only when the right protests is it a, "threat to democracy."

.View attachment 1025549

Anti-Trump protesters march for 3rd night; Portland police call it a 'riot' | CNN

Thousands protesting Donald Trump's victory in the presidential election took to the streets for a third night of demonstrations and vigils in several US cities.

www.cnn.com

J6 was an intended peaceful, constitutionally protected protest to address our government for grievances. In my heart I still do not believe and have no reason to believe it was Patriots/Trump supporters who initiated that riot.

However, if pretty much all of us had not questioned the outcome of that election--we had PLENTY of reason to question the outcome--there would have been no J6, no riot, no problem. Pence would have quietly ceremoniously ratified the congressional vote and that would have been that. There probably wouldn't even have been any press there recording the event.

 

[Foxfyre]

You claim that you would feel the same if Republicans win, yet you admit that you have never questioned the legitimacy of a Republican who won.

Sounds to me like you lack self-awareness. You accept the results of the election you win. For the elections you lose, your right-wing media tells you that the results were not legitimate, so you believe that.

Therefore, you will accept the elections results you win and you will question the election results you lose.

See ya, B.

I will not allow you to define me, what I think, what I accept, what I have questioned, what I will and will not do when you have zero information to make that kind of judgment. I stand by my previous posts.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I will not allow you to define me, what I think, what I accept, what I have questioned, what I will and will not do when you have zero information to make that kind of judgment. I stand by my previous posts.

Right. And surely it must be a magical coincidence that you’ve only ever questioned Democrat wins, never Republican victories.

You lack self-awareness, B.

If Trump wins, you will consider it legitimate. If Kamala wins, you will once again question the legitimacy because that’s what you do.

 

[MisterBeale]

J6 was an intended peaceful, constitutionally protected protest to address our government for grievances. In my heart I still do not believe and have no reason to believe it was Patriots/Trump supporters who initiated that riot.

However, if pretty much all of us had not questioned the outcome of that election--we had PLENTY of reason to question the outcome--there would have been no J6, no riot, no problem. Pence would have quietly ceremoniously ratified the congressional vote and that would have been that. There probably wouldn't even have been any press there recording the event.

Most educated and informed folks know this.

Even the GOP congress held their own investigation on this, but the MSM didn't feel it was news worthy, or spun it in a way that re-inforced the establishment narrative.

Transcripts Show President Trump's Directives to Pentagon Leadership to "Keep January 6 Safe" Were Deliberately Ignored

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

cha.house.gov

January 6

oversightdemocrats.house.gov

Chairs Maloney and Thompson Release New Evidence on DHS IG’s Handling of Inquiry into Erased Text Messages, Renew Call for IG to Step Aside

Washington, D.C. (August 1, 2022)—Today, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, Chairwoman of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and Rep. Bennie G. Thompson, Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, sent a letter to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General Joseph V.

oversightdemocrats.house.gov

The Capitol Insurrection: Unexplained Delays and Unanswered Questions (Part II)

Chairwoman Maloney's Opening Statement [PDF]

oversightdemocrats.house.gov

 

[Foxfyre]

Right. And surely it must be a magical coincidence that you’ve only ever questioned Democrat wins, never Republican victories.

You lack self-awareness, B.

If Trump wins, you will consider it legitimate. If Kamala wins, you will once again question the legitimacy because that’s what you do.

Post the evidence of what I have or have not questioned. If you can't do that, just please shut up.

 

[DGS49]

Leftists know, but refuse to acknowledge, that the 2020 was the most fucked up election in the past hundred years.

Mail-in voting was allowed (and encouraged) in states where it had never been permissible before, and the security measures for those mail-in ballots were not just loose, but ambiguous. Secretaries of State "overruled" existing laws to allow irregularities, courts flouted State constitutions to let it go forward. Ballot boxes were introduced with minimal security provisions, and the laws that prohibited third-party delivery of ballots were rendered impossible to enforce. An internet billionaire spent almost half a billion dollars paying operatives to harvest votes in overwhelming Democrat districts and precincts.

The biggest "October surprise" in history was not only suppressed by the Media, but the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE kept it under wraps in a clear attempt to interfere with the election. More than FIFTY retired Justice and Intelligence officials signed a letter debunking what they knew was reliable, credible evidence of criminal wrongdoing by the Democrat Candidate's family, with his personal participation a certainty.

Challenges were being rejected by courts left and right, almost exclusively on PROCEDURAL grounds (standing, timeliness, etc.), with no opportunities to present evidence of wrongdoing.

But in the midst of this electoral mess, the fact remained that there was not enough PROVABLE FRAUD to have changed the result - as if that would be the only reason to challenge the result - and the Left has latched onto that bizarre fact like a Komodo Dragon latching onto the nether parts of its prey.

And in the wake of all of these "irregularities," the sitting President was supposed to just roll over and play dead. Indeed, four years later, the Media can't seem to think of any other salient questions for Trump or Vance than, "Will you admit that Trump lost in 2020?" as though that were the most important issue facing the incoming President.

No. If they steal another one, "we" will not roll over and admit defeat. Enough said.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Any alleged Dem win would be illegitimate so there you have it.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Post the evidence of what I have or have not questioned. If you can't do that, just please shut up.

Post 75. I asked you when you questioned the legitimacy of a Republican who won.

Show me where your word salad response indicates that you questioned the legitimacy of a Republican who won.