NEITHER AMERICAN PRESIDENTS, NOR CONGRESS, CAN VIOLATE NON-EXISTENT INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Contrary to Taqiyya the Liar’s attempt to hand this country to the United Nations, our Constitution trumps so-called international law. Clearly, he thinks he can beat the Constitution with Security Council resolutions:
More than a year before Taqiyya the Liar unilaterally tried to ratify the ‘TREATY’ with Iran his AG was attacking the US Constitution in the Supreme Court:
No sooner had the United Nations opened for business the words treaty, and international law, became synonyms. Indeed, treaties were the first so-called international laws. There were treaties before the UN, but all-encompassing international laws were created after the global government designed them. The UN’s illegitimate judiciary was set up to administer international law.
Nevertheless, neither treaty, nor international law, ever superseded the Constitution:
The following qualifies as one of the greatest lies the globalists continue to push upon the American people. That lie is: "Treaties supersede the U.S. Constitution".
The Second follow-up lie is this one: "A treaty, once passed, cannot be set aside".
HERE ARE THE CLEAR IRREFUTABLE FACTS: The U.S. Supreme Court has made it very clear that
1) Treaties do not override the U.S. Constitution.
2) Treaties cannot amend the Constitution. And last,
3) A treaty can be nullified by a statute passed by the U.S. Congress (or by a sovereign State or States if Congress refuses to do so), when the State deems a treaty the performance of a treaty is self-destructive. The law of self-preservation overrules the law of obligation in others. When you've read this thoroughly, hopefully, you will never again sit quietly by when someone -- anyone -- claims that treaties supercede the Constitution. Help to dispell this myth.
"This [Supreme] Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over
treaty." - Reid v. Covert, October 1956, 354 U.S. 1, at pg 17.
No Executive Order, Presidential Directive, Executive Agreement, no NAFTA, GATT/WTO agreement/treaty, passed by ANYONE, can supersede the Constitution. FACT. No question!
State Rights Treaties Do Not Supersede the Constitution
Question: Do you think the America-haters will ever get it right?
"International law is not law but politics, ... there is no such law, and the pretense that it exists is a harmful fantasy." Robert Bork
Contrary to Taqiyya the Liar’s attempt to hand this country to the United Nations, our Constitution trumps so-called international law. Clearly, he thinks he can beat the Constitution with Security Council resolutions:
"In other words, a Security Council resolution could mean that the next president can reimpose congressional sanctions only by violating international law."
Senator: Taking Iran deal around Congress to the UN an 'affront'
By Charles Hoskinson | March 12, 2015 | 4:51 pm
Senator Taking Iran deal around Congress to the UN an affront WashingtonExaminer.com
By Charles Hoskinson | March 12, 2015 | 4:51 pm
Senator Taking Iran deal around Congress to the UN an affront WashingtonExaminer.com
More than a year before Taqiyya the Liar unilaterally tried to ratify the ‘TREATY’ with Iran his AG was attacking the US Constitution in the Supreme Court:
Attorney General Eric Holder, made infamous by Operation Fast and Furious, is currently arguing before the Supreme Court that United Nations treaties trump the United States Constitution.
That’s right. The sitting Attorney General, charged with upholding and defending the Constitution, is arguing before the highest court that international law is in fact the law of the land.
That’s right. The sitting Attorney General, charged with upholding and defending the Constitution, is arguing before the highest court that international law is in fact the law of the land.
Holder: International Law Trumps The Constitution!
Holder International Law Trumps The Constitution Conservative Daily
Holder International Law Trumps The Constitution Conservative Daily
No sooner had the United Nations opened for business the words treaty, and international law, became synonyms. Indeed, treaties were the first so-called international laws. There were treaties before the UN, but all-encompassing international laws were created after the global government designed them. The UN’s illegitimate judiciary was set up to administer international law.
Nevertheless, neither treaty, nor international law, ever superseded the Constitution:
The following qualifies as one of the greatest lies the globalists continue to push upon the American people. That lie is: "Treaties supersede the U.S. Constitution".
The Second follow-up lie is this one: "A treaty, once passed, cannot be set aside".
HERE ARE THE CLEAR IRREFUTABLE FACTS: The U.S. Supreme Court has made it very clear that
1) Treaties do not override the U.S. Constitution.
2) Treaties cannot amend the Constitution. And last,
3) A treaty can be nullified by a statute passed by the U.S. Congress (or by a sovereign State or States if Congress refuses to do so), when the State deems a treaty the performance of a treaty is self-destructive. The law of self-preservation overrules the law of obligation in others. When you've read this thoroughly, hopefully, you will never again sit quietly by when someone -- anyone -- claims that treaties supercede the Constitution. Help to dispell this myth.
"This [Supreme] Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over
treaty." - Reid v. Covert, October 1956, 354 U.S. 1, at pg 17.
XXXXX
No Executive Order, Presidential Directive, Executive Agreement, no NAFTA, GATT/WTO agreement/treaty, passed by ANYONE, can supersede the Constitution. FACT. No question!
State Rights Treaties Do Not Supersede the Constitution
Question: Do you think the America-haters will ever get it right?
