I just cant get enough.
You guys are childish and pathetic. I actually pity your parents who are lkely saying "why is he in his underwear on the internet in my basement"...and "why is she looking for D batteries like it is the end all?'
First...no Trump descendant has a charge against her or him
Second....there is no actual proof on any wrong doing
And yes....I saw I spelled likely wrong....but I did that in an effort to give you dickheads something to criticize me about.
Go at it.
Hey, there's no proof of any vote fraud either but that doesn't stop the Diaper in Chief does it.
See post 75 about 'hypothetcal'.
Huh?
Proof of voter fraud will be determined in court if, in fact, proof exists. There are cases presented and we will see how that pans out.
But there are absolutely no cases presented to courts in regard to Trump descendants....because whereas some wish there was proof, no one can come up with anything to allow it to be even remotely considered by the courts.
So the analogy is childish and one I would expect from you.
And the "diaper in chief" thing? Grow up.
Actually what there are absolutely no cases of is voter fraud. Bogus complaint after bogus complaint admits in court that they're NOT claiming fraud. So no, we don't think a court is going to magically "find" something that wasn't even alleged. That's not what courts do.
Again --- the first word in the thread is "
IF". Doesn't matter whether there are cases against them NOW, the concept of "
IF" means a hypothetical is posed.
Finally if you don't like the term "Diaper in Chief" --- find another chief.