Will Obamas wiretapping of Trumps home bring down the democrat party?

[Lewdog]

Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

The President does not request the Justice department to draw up a FISA Warrant for him....that is utterly ridiculous.

Right, Loretta would never do such a thing just to please Obama or Hillary.....

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.

Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.

 

[Lewdog]

Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.

Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.

If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.

 

[owebo]

Trump spouts off crap without evidence and his followers believe it, while when Obama and all the intelligence agencies say Russia hacked the DNC and meddled in the election they won't believe it until they see evidence...

Donna Brazile meddled in the Elections. Go shit yourself over that. There is evidence. CNN style.

So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.

Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.

Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.

So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.

Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....

 

[owebo]

Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.

Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.

If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.

Trump will be stronger because of this....you are still not understanding what we the people did last November.....

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.

Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.

If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.

Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything of this serious magnitude without proof.

 

[Lewdog]

Trump spouts off crap without evidence and his followers believe it, while when Obama and all the intelligence agencies say Russia hacked the DNC and meddled in the election they won't believe it until they see evidence...

Donna Brazile meddled in the Elections. Go shit yourself over that. There is evidence. CNN style.

So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.

Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.

Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.

So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.

Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....

Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?

That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.

 

[Lewdog]

Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.

Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.

If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.

Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.

Really? He tweeted and said he had the largest Electoral College victory in decades... how did that work out for him?

 

[owebo]

Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.

Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.

If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.

Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything of this serious magnitude without proof.

Trump is gaming Obama....and Obama knows this, and also knows he can't win.....

 

[owebo]

Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.

Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.

If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.

Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.

Really? He tweeted and said he had the largest Electoral College victory in decades... how did that work out for him?

You mean POTUS Trump?

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Donna Brazile meddled in the Elections. Go shit yourself over that. There is evidence. CNN style.

So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.

Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.

Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.

So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.

Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....

Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?

That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.

Do you deny wiretapping was ordered against a presidential candidate?

 

[owebo]

Donna Brazile meddled in the Elections. Go shit yourself over that. There is evidence. CNN style.

So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.

Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.

Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.

So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.

Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....

Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?

That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.

Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...

I do believe the democrat staffer who gave wikileaks info is deader than dead.....

 

[Lewdog]

Watch this all blow up and then Trump resigns... and says, "I did this all on purpose in order to expose the corruption of government! Mission accomplished!" He then goes on to write a book about it all and try to make shit tons of money off of being a corrupted crook that set back our country decades.

Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.

If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.

Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.

Really? He tweeted and said he had the largest Electoral College victory in decades... how did that work out for him?

You mean POTUS Trump?

Keep it up, when Trump become the very first POTUS ever impeached AND removed from office, you will never hear the end of it.

 

[Lewdog]

So you admit you only want evidence when it is counteractive to your desires, got it. Now move along.

Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.

Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.

So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.

Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....

Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?

That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.

Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...

I do believe the democrat staffer who gave wikileaks info is deader than dead.....

You HAVE NO EVIDENCE and you believe that... but you don't believe what the government under Obama AND UNDER YOUR butt buddy Trump tell you is true...

You're delusional.

 

[owebo]

Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.

Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.

So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.

Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....

Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?

That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.

Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...

I do believe the democrat staffer who gave wikileaks info is deader than dead.....

You HAVE NO EVIDENCE and you believe that... but you don't believe what the government under Obama AND UNDER YOUR butt buddy Trump tell you is true...

You're delusional.

Poor Seth....he died for Bernie Sanders and you democrats shun him....

 

[owebo]

Actually this is blowing up in Obama's face. Trump will come out victorious.

If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.

Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.

Really? He tweeted and said he had the largest Electoral College victory in decades... how did that work out for him?

You mean POTUS Trump?

Keep it up, when Trump become the very first POTUS ever impeached AND removed from office, you will never hear the end of it.

You need to walk out of the democrat swamp....it's consuming you.....

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Prior to the election, brought up on this board that Hillary's private email server was vulnerable to a hack and many Hillary supporters brushed it off at the time saying there was no evidence of the server being hacked. Hillary lost and the same people who said there was no evidence of a hack prior to the election, now are sure there was a hack.

Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.

So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.

Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....

Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?

That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.

Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...

I do believe the democrat staffer who gave wikileaks info is deader than dead.....

You HAVE NO EVIDENCE and you believe that... but you don't believe what the government under Obama AND UNDER YOUR butt buddy Trump tell you is true...

You're delusional.

Do you deny presidential candidate Trump was wiretapped during the campaign?

 

[Lewdog]

If you think Trump is coming out of this unscathed, you are about as sharp as a we bag of marbles.

Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof.

Really? He tweeted and said he had the largest Electoral College victory in decades... how did that work out for him?

You mean POTUS Trump?

Keep it up, when Trump become the very first POTUS ever impeached AND removed from office, you will never hear the end of it.

You need to walk out of the democrat swamp....it's consuming you.....

Let's put this so simple that even you can understand how ******* retarded you are.

#1. Trump says after seeing the evidence that Russia hacked the DNC and released the information to WikiLeaks.
#2. You say it isn't true because you haven't seen the evidence.
#3. Trump tweets out that Obama wiretapped his place in New York.
#4. You believe it is true without seeing any evidence.

#5. You are in the stage of denial, or brain dead, you chose.

 

[Lewdog]

Russia hacked the DNC not Hillary's server. Could Hillary's server have been hacked? Most certainly, but there is no proof of it like there is the DNC.

So again, when the government says Russia hacked the DNC, gave the information to WikiLeaks, and they made up fake news and spread the propaganda to meddle in the U.S. elections, why do you have to see proof of that from them to believe them, but when Trump says Obama wiretapped him, you don't need to see that proof to believe that? It's a pretty straight forward question.

Actually, that's speculation around poshest as private email account....Seth Rich seems to be the more direct connection to the DNC server information...but democrats murdered him....

Again so you belive some crazy theory without evidence but don't believe it when the government under Obama AND under Trump tells you that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta and released it to WikiLeaks?

That just invalidates your entire opinion on the whole matter.

Again, you have some crazy theory without evidence...

I do believe the democrat staffer who gave wikileaks info is deader than dead.....

You HAVE NO EVIDENCE and you believe that... but you don't believe what the government under Obama AND UNDER YOUR butt buddy Trump tell you is true...

You're delusional.

Do you deny presidential candidate Trump was wiretapped during the campaign?

Do I deny it? I have no way of knowing, there is no proof of it, and a Tweet from the guy who has been deemed the most lying candidate in the modern history of politics isn't going to convince me.