Will Biden select Hillary as his VP?

[Crixus]

What do you think?

I don't think if Hillary gets in again it won't be to suck hind tit to Jose "Cornpop" Biden. If she gets in it will be for the big job.

 

[Crixus]

What do you think?

Her claws might scratch when she is parting his manly leg hair, so probably not.

Meh, he could just tune her up with 6' of chain and a warning shot from his Beretta into the air.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

What do you think?

I hear Trump is levying taxes on Indian casinos come 2021.

 

[Pogo]

What do you think?

No.
If he's nominated he should prolly select O'bama.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What do you think?

Creepy/Drinky 2020

 

[OKTexas]

What do you think?

Are you freaking high? I think he wants to live longer than that. I can't imagine what the ***** would be capable of if she were one heartbeat from the presidency.

.

 

[OKTexas]

What do you think?

No.
If he's nominated he should prolly select O'bama.

Which one? The mooch is the only one eligible.

.

 

[hadit]

What do you think?

Absolutely not. Her ego couldn't stand being in second place, and he'd be afraid he'd have an "accident".

Plus, no president wants an active VP, and since Hillary already tried to take over American healthcare as First Lady, God only knows what she'd try to do as VP.

 

[007]

What do you think?

I love it... I mean... two OLD RICH WHITE PEOPLE, that's fits perfectly with the left's HATE ******, HATE the rich, DIVERSITY hype...

 

[Claudette]

What do you think?

Why would Biden do that?? Hitlery sucks all the oxygen out any room she's in. And her ego fills the building.

Biden doesn't need her or the massive baggage she totes around.

 

[Mac1958]

I do wonder if the fact that Hillary and Biden are at the top of Democratic polls is telling the Regressive Left anything.

Like, maybe, much of the party has lost its shit and has moved far too far to the Left. As Obama has been warning.

I'm guessing not.
.

 

[Likkmee]

What do you think?

Is Mr Rogers still around ?

 

[gipper]

I do wonder if the fact that Hillary and Biden are at the top of Democratic polls is telling the Regressive Left anything.

Like, maybe, much of the party has lost its shit and has moved far too far to the Left. As Obama has been warning.

I'm guessing not.
.

So you want the D Party to mimic the R Party. Corporatism is to your liking. Make sure the rich get richer, and **** everyone else.

 

[Mac1958]

I do wonder if the fact that Hillary and Biden are at the top of Democratic polls is telling the Regressive Left anything. Like, maybe, much of the party has lost its shit and has moved far too far to the Left. As Obama has been warning. I'm guessing not.

So you want the D Party to mimic the R Party. Corporatism is to your liking. Make sure the rich get richer, and **** everyone else.

 

[JoeMoma]

I do wonder if the fact that Hillary and Biden are at the top of Democratic polls is telling the Regressive Left anything. Like, maybe, much of the party has lost its shit and has moved far too far to the Left. As Obama has been warning. I'm guessing not.

So you want the D Party to mimic the R Party. Corporatism is to your liking. Make sure the rich get richer, and **** everyone else.

That's got to be a straw woman, 'cause there is no @#&% dangling between the legs.

 

[gipper]

I do wonder if the fact that Hillary and Biden are at the top of Democratic polls is telling the Regressive Left anything. Like, maybe, much of the party has lost its shit and has moved far too far to the Left. As Obama has been warning. I'm guessing not.

So you want the D Party to mimic the R Party. Corporatism is to your liking. Make sure the rich get richer, and **** everyone else.

I see you can’t debate. Probably because your position is unattainable.

 

[Mac1958]

I do wonder if the fact that Hillary and Biden are at the top of Democratic polls is telling the Regressive Left anything. Like, maybe, much of the party has lost its shit and has moved far too far to the Left. As Obama has been warning. I'm guessing not.

So you want the D Party to mimic the R Party. Corporatism is to your liking. Make sure the rich get richer, and **** everyone else.

I see you can’t debate. Probably because your position is unattainable.

When someone so blatantly misrepresents and fabricates my positions, especially when their post has nothing to do with my post, I remove myself from the conversation.

I used to try to reason with people like that here, but I've realized it's a waste of time, and that all I'm doing is enabling the behaviors.

Please play with someone else, thanks.
.

 

[gipper]

I do wonder if the fact that Hillary and Biden are at the top of Democratic polls is telling the Regressive Left anything. Like, maybe, much of the party has lost its shit and has moved far too far to the Left. As Obama has been warning. I'm guessing not.

So you want the D Party to mimic the R Party. Corporatism is to your liking. Make sure the rich get richer, and **** everyone else.

I see you can’t debate. Probably because your position is unattainable.

When someone so blatantly misrepresents and fabricates my positions, especially when their post has nothing to do with my post, I remove myself from the conversation.

I used to try to reason with people like that here, but I've realized it's a waste of time, and that all I'm doing is enabling the behaviors.

Please play with someone else, thanks.
.

Apparently you are unaware of your own opinion. You clearly support O’s position of nominating another corporatist, like Ears and a HER. You support criticizing D candidates who offer progressive policies. You want the Ds to be like the Rs.

I get it.

 

[Mac1958]

I do wonder if the fact that Hillary and Biden are at the top of Democratic polls is telling the Regressive Left anything. Like, maybe, much of the party has lost its shit and has moved far too far to the Left. As Obama has been warning. I'm guessing not.

So you want the D Party to mimic the R Party. Corporatism is to your liking. Make sure the rich get richer, and **** everyone else.

I see you can’t debate. Probably because your position is unattainable.

When someone so blatantly misrepresents and fabricates my positions, especially when their post has nothing to do with my post, I remove myself from the conversation.

I used to try to reason with people like that here, but I've realized it's a waste of time, and that all I'm doing is enabling the behaviors.

Please play with someone else, thanks.
.

Apparently you aren’t unaware of your own opinion. You clearly support O’s position of nominating another corporatist, like Ears and a HER. You support criticizing D candidates who offer progressive policies. You want the Ds to be like the Rs.

I get it.

And you do it again.
.

 

[gipper]

So you want the D Party to mimic the R Party. Corporatism is to your liking. Make sure the rich get richer, and **** everyone else.

I see you can’t debate. Probably because your position is unattainable.

When someone so blatantly misrepresents and fabricates my positions, especially when their post has nothing to do with my post, I remove myself from the conversation.

I used to try to reason with people like that here, but I've realized it's a waste of time, and that all I'm doing is enabling the behaviors.

Please play with someone else, thanks.
.

Apparently you aren’t unaware of your own opinion. You clearly support O’s position of nominating another corporatist, like Ears and a HER. You support criticizing D candidates who offer progressive policies. You want the Ds to be like the Rs.

I get it.

And you do it again.
.

And you fail to support your position AGAIN.