When Assange admitted that materials damaging to Israel were allowed to be removed from Wikileaks by outsiders, The New York Times and unnamed others, he failed to clarify the process used for adding material to Wikileaks. This process is called “seeding.”
When Brzezinski accused Assange of “seeding” Wikileaks with “pointed material” on behalf of an “intelligence agency,” this is the process he was referring to. It isn’t just that Wikileaks protects Israel but that material damaging to Israel’s enemies is now proven to have been chosen specifically.
GORDON DUFF: WIKIWEASEL II-THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA CRUSHES WIKILEAKS : Veterans Today
Assange is holding dirt on Israel because western newspapers didnÂ’t want to publish it
In an excusive interview with Al Jazeera, Assange said only a meagre number of files related to Israel had been published so far, because the newspapers in the West that were given exclusive rights to publish the secret documents were reluctant to publish many sensitive information about Israel.
“There are 3,700 files related to Israel and the source of 2,700 files is Israel. In the next six months we intend to publish more files depending on our sources,” said Assange in the nearly one-hour interview telecast live from the UK.
Assange is holding dirt on Israel because western newspapers didnÂ’t want to publish it
From
GORDON DUFF: WIKIWEASEL II:
"We know what has been released.
"The genuinely sensitive material held by Wikileaks, that tying Israel to actions against America in Iraq, tying Israel to the drug trade in Afghanistan and tying Israel to terrorism in Pakistan, have yet to be seen.
"Will Assange be releasing these reports in 6 months? Why wait that long?...
"This wonÂ’t be said enough times.
"When material was added and taken away to serve the purpose of powerful outside groups, in this case, all with powerful Israeli ties, it made Wikileaks an agent of censorship, an agent of propaganda and
totally discredited the Wikileaks project."
Before totally discrediting Wikileaks we should decide if Assange, "for some unknown reason, placed full authority for what the public could and couldn't be trusted with in the hands of the New York Times."
We should also examine the pedigree of those labeling WikiLeaks an intelligence operation. Zbigniew Brezinski's a known quantity, Gordon Duff is new to me.
"Gordon Duff is a
Marine Vietnam veteran, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today.
"His career has included extensive experience in
international banking along with such diverse areas as
consulting on counter insurgency, defense technologies or
acting as diplomatic officer of UN humanitarian groups.
"Gordon Duff's articles are published around the world and translated into a number of languages. He is regularly on TV and radio, a popular and sometimes controversial guest.
Assange and WikiLeaks have already made powerful enemies around the globe. There's little reason to think attacks against Wiki will become any less sophisticated, complex, or difficult to unravel.