WikiLeaks CONFIRMED : The Hildebeasty DELETED the emails HERSELF!!!

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2014
51,327
18,077
2,290
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!


This just keeps getting better nd better.... End of week relwase Blow Job video of raping a 13 year olsd, and not THIS!!!!

Wikileaks ^
| 10/12/16
The relevant part: "> *For my question*, it's basically some variation of [not quite phrased > right yet]: I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all > struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with > answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email > addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was > viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure > documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and > delete...
 
You know, you are more drama than can be found in daytime television. Truly you are. Read the whole email from the start. Eventually you'll get to the part that precedes and introduces what you call the "relevant" part. When you get to that part, you'll find that what you call "relevant" is in fact the writer relaying a question that came in from a third party. That is the writer is sharing a question that was asked not a statement Hillary Clinton made.

Literally from the email:

Couple of questions that came in:
  1. you're obviously amongst friends, but here's the one i referred to > (can't remember which of you i talked about it with, if not both). It's > from someone that wasn't goign to come, and i encouraged him to come. he > comes at the issue slightly differnetly than what I've dsicussed with both > of you (Ok, one thing to use personal email, but why the "twisted truth" > (not my words) on why - with the two problematic areas being (a) emails to > bill (when they were to bill's staff) and (b) i only used one device -- BB, > when 2 weeks earlier, it was an iphone, BB and ipad. As Ann and I > discussed, hopefully that's a timing issue and whilst in state, she only > used one. :)

    *For my question*, it's basically some variation of [not quite phrased > right yet]: I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all > struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with > answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email > addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was > viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure > documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and > delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to > weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of > thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.

 

Forum List

Back
Top