PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
1. Since the moment Hussein Obama dropped the pretense, and stopped lying to the American public...
October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our stro, wngest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"
.....and admitted that his plan all along was to empower his co-religionists because....well......because they are his co-religionists, and he felt no obligation either to America nor to Western Civilization........
...we have been "treated" to the passion play of a Middle East Holocaust as a work in progress.
2. The subtext of every anti-nuclear Iran post of mine is that it proves Democrat voter to be mindless automatons, who follow orderw with the blindless obedience of the Good Germans of yesteryear.
If this were not so, I wouldn't have been able to ask this question without getting a substantive response:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
Why the Democrat-Iran Deal????
3. Moving on from Hussein Obama, Biden has decided to prove that he likes slaughter and worldwide conflagration as well as the next Democrat. And now we have this:
4. ...take a look at reports from late January that three top U.S. diplomats had quit—largely in protest over the direction set by U.S. Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley, who serves as the U.S. government’s chief negotiator....The deal being negotiated in Vienna is dangerous to U.S. national security, to the stability of the Middle East, and to the Iranian people who suffer most under that brutal regime. The lack of evidence to justify a removal of U.S. sanctions is illegal, and the deal that will be foisted upon the world without the support of Congress will be illegitimate. This deal will not serve U.S. interests in either the short or long term.
5. the United States has promised to lift sanctions on some of the regime’s worst terrorists and torturers, on leading officials who have developed Iran’s WMD infrastructure, and has agreed to lift sanctions on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) itself. In exchange, Iran will receive fewer limitations than those imposed under the JCPOA, and the restrictions on its nuclear program will expire six years sooner than under the terms of the old deal. And that’s just the beginning."
October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our stro, wngest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"
.....and admitted that his plan all along was to empower his co-religionists because....well......because they are his co-religionists, and he felt no obligation either to America nor to Western Civilization........
...we have been "treated" to the passion play of a Middle East Holocaust as a work in progress.
2. The subtext of every anti-nuclear Iran post of mine is that it proves Democrat voter to be mindless automatons, who follow orderw with the blindless obedience of the Good Germans of yesteryear.
If this were not so, I wouldn't have been able to ask this question without getting a substantive response:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
Why the Democrat-Iran Deal????
3. Moving on from Hussein Obama, Biden has decided to prove that he likes slaughter and worldwide conflagration as well as the next Democrat. And now we have this:
"This Isn’t Obama’s Iran Deal. It’s Much, Much Worse.
The last thing the world needs is another nuclear-armed dictatorship flush with cash and attacking its neighbors. But that’s what President Biden and his Iran envoy Robert Malley are creating in the deal they are about to close in Vienna, according to career State Department sources." This Isn’t Obama’s Iran Deal. It’s Much, Much Worse.
4. ...take a look at reports from late January that three top U.S. diplomats had quit—largely in protest over the direction set by U.S. Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley, who serves as the U.S. government’s chief negotiator....The deal being negotiated in Vienna is dangerous to U.S. national security, to the stability of the Middle East, and to the Iranian people who suffer most under that brutal regime. The lack of evidence to justify a removal of U.S. sanctions is illegal, and the deal that will be foisted upon the world without the support of Congress will be illegitimate. This deal will not serve U.S. interests in either the short or long term.
5. the United States has promised to lift sanctions on some of the regime’s worst terrorists and torturers, on leading officials who have developed Iran’s WMD infrastructure, and has agreed to lift sanctions on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) itself. In exchange, Iran will receive fewer limitations than those imposed under the JCPOA, and the restrictions on its nuclear program will expire six years sooner than under the terms of the old deal. And that’s just the beginning."
