Why?

[BackAgain]

158 Dems vote against bill to deport illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes

The House of Representatives passed a bill aimed at deporting illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes and deeming them inadmissible to the U.S.

www.foxnews.com

Why on Earth would ANYBODY in either Parry not agree to deport aliens — especially illegal aliens — who commit sex crimes here?

I am stumped. Seriously. I can divine no logical (or even political) reason for it.

Can anyone explain “why?”

 

[otto105]

158 Dems vote against bill to deport illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes

The House of Representatives passed a bill aimed at deporting illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes and deeming them inadmissible to the U.S.

www.foxnews.com

Why on Earth would ANYBODY in either Parry not agree to deport aliens — especially illegal aliens — who commit sex crimes here?

I am stumped. Seriously. I can divine no logical (or even political) reason for it.

Can anyone explain “why?”

Blotto

Get your degree first from Favor.

 

[pknopp]

It's already a deportable act.

 

[sealybobo]

158 Dems vote against bill to deport illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes

The House of Representatives passed a bill aimed at deporting illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes and deeming them inadmissible to the U.S.

www.foxnews.com

Why on Earth would ANYBODY in either Parry not agree to deport aliens — especially illegal aliens — who commit sex crimes here?

I am stumped. Seriously. I can divine no logical (or even political) reason for it.

Can anyone explain “why?”

Every story has an answer to the why. I'm not going to go dig for the why. I'll assume this is a half true story, or mostly false. Or pants on fire.

If you read the article you should be able to tell us why they say they did this. If they did this.

Does Fox News have a question mark at the end of the headline? That means it's not a fact. They're JUST ASKING. Did Trump really call the georgia secretary of state and ask him to find him 11,000 more votes so he could win the state? See? Like that.

 

[toobfreak]

158 Dems vote against bill to deport illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes​

Why on Earth would ANYBODY in either Parry not agree to deport aliens — especially illegal aliens — who commit sex crimes here?
I am stumped. Seriously. I can divine no logical (or even political) reason for it.
Can anyone explain “why?”

The reason is obvious. Democrats value illegal aliens here far more than they value your wife, sister, daughter or mother. It is just one more necessary evil they are prepared to subject you to in their efforts to utilize mass illegal immigration from whomever is willing to come here, just so long as they vote democrat in exchange so that we can have a one-party system.

THEIRS.

Witness the real coup occurring right before your eyes and no one in the GOP seems worried about it except mainly TRUMP.

 

[BluesLegend]

They are not illegal aliens, they are future Dem voters BRIBED to vote Dem with your tax dollars.

 

[elektra]

Simple, the Democrats now must protect us from the rapists.

And, Democrats only believe in dictatorships. So democrats sre proving freedom, democracy does not work.

 

[BackAgain]

Every story has an answer to the why. I'm not going to go dig for the why. I'll assume this is a half true story, or mostly false. Or pants on fire.

If you read the article you should be able to tell us why they say they did this. If they did this.

Does Fox News have a question mark at the end of the headline? That means it's not a fact. They're JUST ASKING. Did Trump really call the georgia secretary of state and ask him to find him 11,000 more votes so he could win the state? See? Like that.

How stupid are you, exactly?

Did those fuckin Dims vote against it or didn’t they?

Ffs, you’re brain dead.

 

[Crepitus]

158 Dems vote against bill to deport illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes

The House of Representatives passed a bill aimed at deporting illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes and deeming them inadmissible to the U.S.

www.foxnews.com

Why on Earth would ANYBODY in either Parry not agree to deport aliens — especially illegal aliens — who commit sex crimes here?

I am stumped. Seriously. I can divine no logical (or even political) reason for it.

Can anyone explain “why?”

Republicans tanked it, not Democrats. It's not their bill.

 

[Crepitus]

158 Dems vote against bill to deport illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes

The House of Representatives passed a bill aimed at deporting illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes and deeming them inadmissible to the U.S.

www.foxnews.com

Why on Earth would ANYBODY in either Parry not agree to deport aliens — especially illegal aliens — who commit sex crimes here?

I am stumped. Seriously. I can divine no logical (or even political) reason for it.

Can anyone explain “why?”

Below is a list of Republicans who rejected the stopgap bill.

Jim Banks, Indiana
Andy Biggs, Alabama
Lauren Boebert, Colorado
Tim Burchett, Tennessee
Elijah Crane, Arizona
Matt Gaetz, Florida
Wesley Hunt, Texas
Doug Lamborn, Colorado
Nancy Mace, South Carolina
Cory Mills, Florida
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Matt Rosendale, Montana
W. Gregory Steube, Florida
Beth Van Duyne, Texas

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

158 Dems vote against bill to deport illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes

The House of Representatives passed a bill aimed at deporting illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes and deeming them inadmissible to the U.S.

www.foxnews.com

Why on Earth would ANYBODY in either Parry not agree to deport aliens — especially illegal aliens — who commit sex crimes here?

I am stumped. Seriously. I can divine no logical (or even political) reason for it.

Can anyone explain “why?”

Yes. Your party of savages not so gently threw you up against a pony wall and fucked you properly. And here you are, asking for seconds.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes. Your party of savages not so gently threw you up against a pony wall and fucked you properly. And here you are, asking for seconds.

You are quite insane. But also retarded.

My party isn’t a party of savages.and they don’t fuck me ata all, of course.

Nothing to ask for “seconds” on either.

Meanwhile, you fail to even try to answer the question. You’re a pussy as well as a retard.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

You are quite insane. But also retarded.

My party isn’t a party of savages.and they don’t fuck me ata all, of course.

Of course they do. And you'll vote for it, willingly.

Meanwhile, you fail to even try to answer the question. You’re a pussy as well as a retard.

The answer is you're in a CULT. You bleev what is fed to you.

 

[toobfreak]

You are quite insane. But also retarded.

Wow. A twofer! Nice shooting!

 

[BackAgain]

Of course they do. And you'll vote for it, willingly.

You’re too tragically retarded to recognize that you’re merely babbling at this juncture.

The answer is you're in a CULT. You bleev what is fed to you.

You people in the leftward cult are quick to accuse others of being in a cult.

But you’re still too stupid and cowardly to answer the question.

 

[gipper]

There is little difference between the two parties (really two criminal gangs) but dumb Americans like the OP, can’t or won’t accept this fact.

The oligarchy loves dumb Americans. This board is full of them.

 

[TNHarley]

I bet that bill was a thousand pages long. I wouldnt have signed that shit either.
Why do we need voting and immigration rules in with a spending bill?

 

[BackAgain]

It's already a deportable act.

That would be a fair enough answer if our Immigration and Naturalization Act was written logically and on the level. It isn’t.

(a)Classes of deportable aliens

Any alien (including an aliencrewman) in and admitted to the United States shall, upon the order of the Attorney General, be removed if the alien is within one or more of the following classes of deportable aliens:
(1)Inadmissible at time of entry or of adjustment of status or violates status
(A)Inadmissible aliens
Any alien who at the time of entry or adjustment of status was within one or more of the classes of aliens inadmissible by the law existing at such time is deportable.
(B)Present in violation of law
Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this chapter or any other law of the United States, or whose nonimmigrant visa (or other documentation authorizing admission into the United States as a nonimmigrant) has been revoked under section 1201(i) of this title, is deportable.

8 U.S. Code § 1227 - Deportable aliens​

Let’s begin by noting that “deportable” doesn’t translate into “must be deported.”

And let us further note that getting deported requires an order from the attorney general. (Delegated to the Immigrarion “judges.” And their orders are themselves subject to several routes and ways to avoid deportation. Again: no requirement of deportation.)

A law flatly requiring (ie, no AG discretion to grant any dispensation and no discretion in our immigration “courts”) that any alien (legal or illegal) must be ordered deported and removed if found guilty in a court of law of having committed a sex crime is thus still needed.

 

[pknopp]

That would be a fair enough answer if our Immigration and Naturalization Act was written logically and on the level. It isn’t.

8 U.S. Code § 1227 - Deportable aliens​

Let’s begin by noting that “deportable” doesn’t translate into “must be deported.”

And let us further note that getting deported requires an order from the attorney general. (Delegated to the Immigrarion “judges.” And their orders are themselves subject to several routes and ways to avoid deportation. Again: no requirement of deportation.)

A law flatly requiring (ie, no AG discretion to grant any dispensation and no discretion in our immigration “courts”) that any alien (legal or illegal) must be ordered deported and removed if found guilty in a court of law of having committed a sex crime is thus still needed.

All presidents do now is enact executive orders to enforce or ignore what ever they wish.

 

[BackAgain]

All presidents do now is enact executive orders to enforce or ignore what ever they wish.

No. But that is a large part of the Administrative State favored by Democrats.

And it’s not “enact.” It’s just “issue” or “promulgate.” You know. Dictatorial type fiats. (Absent Congressional authority via an actual law, of course, most of the EO’s are simply unconstitutional.)