Why Would Trump Pardon Maxwell?

You said that. I questioned it.

Repeating yourself is not an answer.
You have NOTHING AT ALL AGAINST ANYONE, without the girls identifying them or being the eye witness...in a court of law, to PROSECUTE THEM!!! Maxwell could make any claim she wants, against any of the guys she wants to....that does not mean shit or shinola! Even with video, they need the girls to identify themselves, what their age was etc when it happened AND a jury may not Convict with just a video knowing the victim is alive and did not testify against him, even in a private session.

Are you doing this for political reasons and NOT TO PROSECUTE the bad guys and make headway in breaking up these kind of "perks" for the rich and famous, or to give justice for these abused girls?
 
Trump is so dishonest, consider his marriages and cheating etc etc. That the idiot is president says lots about his voters, as for him his record of corruption is obvious but hate for the other often leads to corrupt leaders, history is full of examples.

 
You have NOTHING AT ALL AGAINST ANYONE, without the girls identifying them or being the eye witness...in a court of law, to PROSECUTE THEM!!! Maxwell could make any claim she wants, against any of the guys she wants to....that does not mean shit or shinola! Even with video, they need the girls to identify themselves, what their age was etc when it happened AND a jury may not Convict with just a video knowing the victim is alive and did not testify against him, even in a private session.

Are you doing this for political reasons and NOT TO PROSECUTE the bad guys and make headway in breaking up these kind of "perks" for the rich and famous, or to give justice for these abused girls?


you seem to have forgotten my point.

I'm not sure the girls CAN identify their johns.

This was years ago. I assume the girls were all drugged or drunk at the time. I assume that they have spent the year since doing MORE damage to their brains with more drugs and/or drink.

Are you imagining that the girls were given detailed introductions to their johns?


Even if the Johns didn't use false names, would the girls remember the names of any specific customers?


Would you like to address that now, or would you like to continue to just repeat your talking points?
 
Trump is so dishonest, consider his marriages and cheating etc etc. That the idiot is president says lots about his voters, as for him his record of corruption is obvious but hate for the other often leads to corrupt leaders, history is full of examples.



Trump was telling the truth on this issue. Biden, Obama, the media, the left as a whole, were the ones telling the BIG LIE, over and over again.

They torn this country apart.

How much of Trump's BANDWIDTH, was sucked up in his first term by this shit?


How much of our turn was denied becasue of the time and energy wasted on this criminal, if not treasonous, pile of shit?
 
I doubt that would enough of deal to get her to talk
I wouldn't give her a deal to talk.

She perjured herself several times during her interrogations for trial, she never admitted guilt or gave help in finding other pedophiles/ephebophiles, or for anything about Epstein's finances....nada....she wanted no plea deal.

And now...after conviction...after hearing about her own sexual abuse towards these underage women by victims in trial, you want to work a deal with her ahead of time to get her a reduced sentence?

She was the front madame and mastermind on getting these thousands of abused young woman over the years....yes, Jeffrey had the sickness and was the primary sexual abuser, but she supplied him...with every girl he was ever with.

NO DEAL

In my book! If she wants to admit her own guilt and give names for her own conscious, then great, maybe she will be given probation early and on her first try!
 
Of course he gave consideration, he was asked by a reporter so he had to consider her question to respond to it
Everyone (with a brain) knows that the pardon power is absolute.

The only reason for him to highlight that is to dangle a pardon to get a result

Makes him look complicit at the very least
 
you seem to have forgotten my point.

I'm not sure the girls CAN identify their johns.

This was years ago. I assume the girls were all drugged or drunk at the time. I assume that they have spent the year since doing MORE damage to their brains with more drugs and/or drink.

Are you imagining that the girls were given detailed introductions to their johns?


Even if the Johns didn't use false names, would the girls remember the names of any specific customers?


Would you like to address that now, or would you like to continue to just repeat your talking points?
If they were rich and famous, you can bet your last dollar they CAN identify them, even 20 years later....with their aging....just by following the news or reading magazines and now the internet.

No one in Doj or local law enforcement or law enforcement overseas... due to pressures for certain, would not even listen to Virginia about Prince Andrew, so she had to have a civil suit...and won....but NOW she is dead...suicide they say...

Other girls have come forward but threats to themselves and family members have made them backdown, with no help from law enforcement to protect them, or even any earnest to prosecute... they seem afraid too....?

They were not all drugged or drunk. Where did you get that....?
 
Last edited:
Yep, that’s unfortunate. He agreed not to prosecute him federally, due to the state charges, little did he know the Dem DA in Miami would cut him some slack

And then the Dem DA in NYC would help him off the sex offender list

Acosta was not a Dem

Huge fail
 
I wouldn't give her a deal to talk.

She perjured herself several times during her interrogations for trial, she never admitted guilt or gave help in finding other pedophiles/ephebophiles, or for anything about Epstein's finances....nada....she wanted no plea deal.

And now...after conviction...after hearing about her own sexual abuse towards these underage women by victims in trial, you want to work a deal with her ahead of time to get her a reduced sentence?

She was the front madame and mastermind on getting these thousands of abused young woman over the years....yes, Jeffrey had the sickness and was the primary sexual abuser, but she supplied him...with every girl he was ever with.

NO DEAL

In my book! If she wants to admit her own guilt and give names for her own consc fious, then great, maybe she will be given probation early and on her first try!


Man, it's funny when libs suddenly become hardliners on jail time for criminals.

Some black guy or an illegal stabs some white guy and it's all about how SOCIETY FAILED, or some such shit.


BUt every now and then, someone for some reason, doesn't make the cut.

And that bleeding heart just ... stops bleeding.
 
He hasn’t yet indicated that he would but he says he “can”

My question is why would he?

Why pardon someone complicit in Epstein’s disgusting crimes?
You guys demanded names. Are you now going to deny all names she releases? Please make up your mind.
 
Everyone (with a brain) knows that the pardon power is absolute.

The only reason for him to highlight that is to dangle a pardon to get a result

Makes him look complicit at the very least
It's just a gotchya question gaslight set-up just so MORONS like you can post the above.
You people are sickening.
 
It's just a gotchya question gaslight set-up just so MORONS like you can post the above.
You people are sickening.
Considering the fact that his lawyer is having meetings with her…

Not so much
 
You guys demanded names. Are you now going to deny all names she releases? Please make up your mind.
We demand EVIDENCE

ALL of it. Not just the cherry picked bullshit Trump is releasing
 
15th post
Acosta was not a Dem

Huge fail
The DA of Miami was, reading comprehension is hard for you…Acosta agteed not to bring federal charges because the state was, then they offered him the no time deal

And so was the DA of NYC that worked to get him off the sex offender registry
 
Everyone (with a brain) knows that the pardon power is absolute.

The only reason for him to highlight that is to dangle a pardon to get a result

Makes him look complicit at the very least
He didn’t highlight it, a dembot reporter asked him about it and he answered the question
 
He hasn’t yet indicated that he would but he says he “can”

My question is why would he?

Why pardon someone complicit in Epstein’s disgusting crimes?
There wouldn't be a good reason and I dont think he should. She was convicted and proven to have committed horrendous crimes, she deserves to stay in prison
 
Back
Top Bottom