Why Would Trump Pardon Maxwell?

[Redfish]

He hasn’t yet indicated that he would but he says he “can”

Trump says he hasn't considered pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell, but 'I'm allowed to do it'

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell and her attorney Friday in Tallahassee for a second day of interviews.

www.nbcnews.com

My question is why would he?

Why pardon someone complicit in Epstein’s disgusting crimes?

better question: why would HIllary murder Maxwell?

 

[Lesh]

better question: why would HIllary murder Maxwell?

Shrooms affecting you?

 

[dblack]

I think that people are just ready to accept another placebo investigation. There have been so many that we expect them now, like Tiny Tim, begging for a little more gruel but not really expecting any.

Wow.... how depressingly true.

 

[dblack]

better question: why would HIllary murder Maxwell?

Because she has the List?

 

[berg80]

Trump was telling the truth on this issue. Biden, Obama, the media, the left as a whole, were the ones telling the BIG LIE, over and over again.

You have no idea how crazy that sounds to those of us who don't live in the MAGAverse.

“The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this, Maria, is what you’re implying here directly, is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out.”

— Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, speaking to Maria Bartiromo on “Sunday Morning Futures,” July 20
With fanfare, Gabbard on Friday released alleged evidence of what she called a “treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government” — namely the intelligence community’s conclusion in early 2017 that Russian President Vladimir Putin decided to interfere in the 2016 presidential election on behalf of Donald Trump. The president has embraced her findings — which she said would be referred for criminal prosecution — and even tweeted an AI-generated video of Barack Obama being arrested.

But Gabbard has a problem. How can she discover new evidence that somehow eluded four previous investigations: a 2019 report released by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III; a 2019 Justice Department inspector general report; a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee issued in 2020 by a GOP-controlled Senate; and a 2023 report released by special counsel John Durham, appointed in Trump’s first term?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/22/gabbard-trump-obama-fact-checker/

 

[Lesh]

She was appointed to give Trump cover and that’s what she’s doing

 

[Correll]

You have no idea how crazy that sounds to those of us who don't live in the MAGAverse.

“The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this, Maria, is what you’re implying here directly, is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out.”

— Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, speaking to Maria Bartiromo on “Sunday Morning Futures,” July 20
With fanfare, Gabbard on Friday released alleged evidence of what she called a “treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government” — namely the intelligence community’s conclusion in early 2017 that Russian President Vladimir Putin decided to interfere in the 2016 presidential election on behalf of Donald Trump. The president has embraced her findings — which she said would be referred for criminal prosecution — and even tweeted an AI-generated video of Barack Obama being arrested.

But Gabbard has a problem. How can she discover new evidence that somehow eluded four previous investigations: a 2019 report released by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III; a 2019 Justice Department inspector general report; a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee issued in 2020 by a GOP-controlled Senate; and a 2023 report released by special counsel John Durham, appointed in Trump’s first term?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/22/gabbard-trump-obama-fact-checker/

Buddy. You're the one in a bubble, not me.

 

[Lesh]

There is only one reason for anyone to pardon Maxwell

Cover

 

[Correll]

There is only one reason for anyone to pardon Maxwell

Cover

Or maybe, you are just to full of hate to consider other possiblities.

AND, lets keep in mind, that the person that raised the possiblity of a pardon, was a leftard reporter.

SO.... NOTHING HERE.

 

[Lesh]

Or maybe, you are just to full of hate to consider other possiblities.

AND, lets keep in mind, that the person that raised the possiblity of a pardon, was a leftard reporter.

SO.... NOTHING HERE.

Pure Trump cover bullshit and you know it

 

[lennypartiv]

There is only one reason for anyone to pardon Maxwell

Cover

Americans just want this to go away.

 

[Mac1958]

There is only one reason for anyone to pardon Maxwell

Cover

I think there's better than a 50/50 chance that the names she'll drop will coincidentally not hurt either Trump or the GQP. That was Blanche's job, his mission.

And like everything else with Trump, it will all happen right out in the open and no one will do anything about it for fear of "retribution". You don't **** with a Mafia boss.

Anyway, from that smaller list, I hope the bastards get nailed. But I won't be expecting any more than that.

 

[Dragonlady]

Because she has the List?

What part of there is not and has never been a “list” are you people not getting?

If Maxwell had real evidence against the rich and powerful, why hasn’t she used it before now?

The bald fact is the Maxwell is not a credible witness. She has lied and purjured herself multiple times and proven herself to be an unreliable witness.

The reliable witnesses are the victims. They know who they had sex with. You want to go after the abusers, ask the victims.

 

[Correll]

Pure Trump cover bullshit and you know it

Which part? That you are full of hate? LOL.

Or that being full of hate, doesn't interfer with your ability to think?


It is VERY telling that you did not challenge me to list some of those other reasons. You just shit talked.

 

[berg80]

I think that people are just ready to accept another placebo investigation. There have been so many that we expect them now, like Tiny Tim, begging for a little more gruel but not really expecting any.

That was Oliver Twist.

 

[berg80]

AND, lets keep in mind, that the person that raised the possiblity of a pardon, was a leftard reporter.

C'mon man, you really think it took being asked for Dotard to have thought about a pardon? He absolutely loves having the unilateral power to issue pardons. What's wrong with you?

 

[Correll]

C'mon man, you really think it took being asked for Dotard to have thought about a pardon? He absolutely loves having the unilateral power to issue pardons. What's wrong with you?

We have no real idea of what is in the files, nor what Trump's possible expose is.


He could be anywhere from complete unconcern to completely terrified.


So, yes, it is completely possible that he has not given this specific use of a pardon any thought.


Any one that claims otherwise, is full of shit.

 

[d0gbreath]

He won't pardon her. He always seeks to make headlines that make him look good. He couldn't look any worse if he does pardon her.