Why Would Trump Pardon Maxwell?

[the watcher]

This Epstein crap is nothing new, it is the essence of the power structure here. You can call it an anomaly, but it is not. It exists because it is allowed to exist, and inherent in the nature of man to accumulate power and abuse it. The Franklin Bank case was swept under, which demonstrates the existence of involvement at a very high level. This is one short version of it, but there are many documentaries of it, the Conspiracy of Silence maybe the best documented. No one cares, unless it is to get at a particular candidate that you don't like. Dig into the activities of the administration in Mena Arkansas when Clinton was governor, and you might begin to understand why we do things here like we do. The Epstein incident will be paved over and replaced with the boiler plate narrative that can't be questioned.

 

[22lcidw]

What? Unsubstantiated bullshit for a response?

Dems aren’t talking about pardoning this ******* pedo creep

Trump is

No matter what happens on this, we need to make sure our politicians and those working around them are vetted. With no outside interests holding the person hostage for this.

 

[konradv]

No matter what happens on this, we need to make sure our politicians and those working around them are vetted. With no outside interests holding the person hostage for this.

Reverse Citizens United. It guarantees that the ordinary citizens will be ignored in favor of donors with the biggest checks.

 

[struth]

He hasn’t yet indicated that he would but he says he “can”

Trump says he hasn't considered pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell, but 'I'm allowed to do it'

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell and her attorney Friday in Tallahassee for a second day of interviews.

www.nbcnews.com

My question is why would he?

Why pardon someone complicit in Epstein’s disgusting crimes?

Maybe she has information like this infamous liar Dems keep talking about…if she can help take down other pedos a trade maybe in order

 

[struth]

What? Unsubstantiated bullshit for a response?

Dems aren’t talking about pardoning this ******* pedo creep

Trump is

Didn’t you start this thread about pardoning her?? Haha

 

[the watcher]

No matter what happens on this, we need to make sure our politicians and those working around them are vetted. With no outside interests holding the person hostage for this.

Who do you propose to "vet" these slimeballs that show up at the conventions? The Ministry of Honesty? Come on.

 

[Correll]

What? Unsubstantiated bullshit for a response?

Dems aren’t talking about pardoning this ******* pedo creep

Trump is

He was asked about it, by a dem.

He responded to a question from the media.


YOu are stupid.

 

[struth]

He was asked about it, by a dem.

He responded to a question from the media.


YOu are stupid.

Right?? It’s all these Dems are talking about! It’s pretty obvious they are worried she might have sine info on the party she and Epstein supported so much

 

[Lesh]

Right?? It’s all these Dems are talking about! It’s pretty obvious they are worried she might have sine info on the party she and Epstein supported so much

What’s obvious… is that she can do great damage to the orange pedo

 

[Lesh]

Maybe she has information like this infamous liar Dems keep talking about…if she can help take down other pedos a trade maybe in order

Maybe?

She was right in the middle of all of it

 

[Correll]

What’s obvious… is that she can do great damage to the orange pedo

What is she waiting for then?

 

[Lesh]

Yeah, he got a sweetheart deal, so Trump’s involvement wouldn’t come out.

And the prosecutor who orchestrated that deal ended up in Trump’s Cabinet

 

[struth]

Maybe?

She was right in the middle of all of it

Oh so then why did you ask the question to begin with? Sounds like you already knew of a reason

Makes you wonder why Xiden’s DOJ was never interested in this when they were prosecuting her

I wonder why?

 

[berg80]

What? Unsubstantiated bullshit for a response?

Dems aren’t talking about pardoning this ******* pedo creep

Trump is

Emphatically denying he has given consideration to a pardon means he absolutely has since more often than not when he says something the opposite is true. In all likelihood the reason he sent a devoted loyalist to speak with her is trump can trust Blanche to dangle a pardon without fear of a leak.

Obviously, the goal here is to extract something from her that takes attention away from trump's name appearing in the file. If she has rock solid evidence implicating a rich or famous person, enough to work towards an indictment, that would do the trick.

The offer might go something like this. Give me X person on a platter and you'll get a pardon on my way out the door in 3 1/2 years.

 

[Care4all]

If she spills the beans and it results in several one percenters getting prosecuted and spending the rest of their lives in prison it would be worth giving her immunity, in my opinion, but that would be the only scenario.

Fyi
She was the mastermind, behind getting the young girls, and how to keep them silent and keep them there and recruit more and more and more fresh young girls through a pyramid type set up and payment system....

 

[struth]

And the prosecutor who orchestrated that deal ended up in Trump’s Cabinet

Yep, that’s unfortunate. He agreed not to prosecute him federally, due to the state charges, little did he know the Dem DA in Miami would cut him some slack

And then the Dem DA in NYC would help him off the sex offender list

Manhattan DA’s office asked judge to lower Jeffrey Epstein’s sex offender status in 2011 | CNN

The argument drew pointed questions from Judge Ruth Pickholz, who said she had never seen the prosecutor’s office make a “downward argument” like this, according to an appeals court filing.

amp.cnn.com

 

[Dragonlady]

He hasn’t yet indicated that he would but he says he “can”

Trump says he hasn't considered pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell, but 'I'm allowed to do it'

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell and her attorney Friday in Tallahassee for a second day of interviews.

www.nbcnews.com

My question is why would he?

Why pardon someone complicit in Epstein’s disgusting crimes?

Republicans are trying to rehabilitate Maxwell’s image claiming she’s a “victim” too. Shades of Karla Homolka.

Homolka was married to serial killer Paul Bernardo. He raped and murdered 4 teenage girls, including Homolka’s younger sister.

Like Maxwell, she helped Bernardo procure his victims, sexually abused them and according to Bernardo, she killed the girls not him. She made the approaches and the good looking young couple (dubbed the “Ken and Barbie Killers” by the press), easily got close enough to the girls, to force them into their car.

Upon their arrest, Homolka claimed she was abused by Bernardo and a victim as well. Homolka made a deal with the Crown which saw her, in essence, go free, in exchange for her testimony.

And then they found the video tapes.

The tapes showed the police her true involvement and had they been found before they signed that deal, she’d still be in jail like Bernardo. Instead, she served 2 years or less, and has since remarried and is now a suburban mother in Montreal. God help her children.

Now they’re trying to say that Maxwell is a “victim”. The REAL victims say otherwise. They say that Maxwell made Epstein possible by recruiting his victims who she also sexually abused. Maxwell is just as much a monster as Epstein.

This woman is no “victim”.

 

[struth]

Emphatically denying he has given consideration to a pardon means he absolutely has since more often than not when he says something the opposite is true. In all likelihood the reason he sent a devoted loyalist to speak with her is trump can trust Blanche to dangle a pardon without fear of a leak.

Obviously, the goal here is to extract something from her that takes attention away from trump's name appearing in the file. If she has rock solid evidence implicating a rich or famous person, enough to work towards an indictment, that would do the trick.

The offer might go something like this. Give me X person on a platter and you'll get a pardon on my way out the door in 3 1/2 years.

Of course he gave consideration, he was asked by a reporter so he had to consider her question to respond to it

 

[Hollie]

He hasn’t yet indicated that he would but he says he “can”

Trump says he hasn't considered pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell, but 'I'm allowed to do it'

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell and her attorney Friday in Tallahassee for a second day of interviews.

www.nbcnews.com

My question is why would he?

Why pardon someone complicit in Epstein’s disgusting crimes?

Why such a pointless thread when you acknowledge, “He hasn’t yet indicated that he would but he says he “can”

 

[braalian]

Of course he gave consideration, he was asked by a reporter so he had to consider her question to respond to it

By that logic, no person has ever responded to a question without thinking about it first

We know that isn’t true

Responding without thinking is one of the main ways humans everywhere get themselves into trouble