Why Won't Trump Call Out Radical White Terrorism?

[deanrd]

Why Won't Trump Call Out Radical White Terrorism?

Because he's their leader. Duh!

 

[Lumpy 1]

Trump will not call out the domestic terrorist because he needs their support as a major part of his base. The racist supporters have let him know that he was elected with their help and trump knows without their support now his approval rating will drop into the twenty and even teen percentage points.
Trump does not have the courage to stand up to the racists who are a major factor in his base of support.

Your grasp of reality is non-existent ..

 

[Camp]

Trump will not call out the domestic terrorist because he needs their support as a major part of his base. The racist supporters have let him know that he was elected with their help and trump knows without their support now his approval rating will drop into the twenty and even teen percentage points.
Trump does not have the courage to stand up to the racists who are a major factor in his base of support.

Your grasp of reality is non-existent ..

View attachment 143562

Mine is rational and yours is delusional.

 

[2aguy]

On November 15, 2015, as the world grappled with the horrors of a multipronged ISIS attack in Paris, Donald Trump, who was then an improbable but officially declared candidate for the presidency, tweeted, “When will President Obama issue the words RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM? He can’t say it, and unless he will, the problem will not be solved!”

I raise the subject of this tweet, and the sentiment that motivated it, in light of President Trump’s remarkable reaction to the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, this weekend. “We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides,” he said. Trump, when presented with the chance to denounce, in plain, direct language, individuals who could fairly be described as “white supremacist terrorists,” or with some other equivalent formulation, instead resorted to euphemism and moral equivalence.

Trump’s position on the matter of President Obama’s anti-terrorism rhetoric did not place him outside the Republican mainstream. Obama’s critics argued throughout his presidency that his unwillingness to embrace the incantatory rhetoric of civilizational struggle—his reluctance to cast such groups as al-Qaeda and ISIS as vanguards of an all-encompassing ideological and theological challenge to the West—meant that, at the very least, he misunderstood the nature of the threat, or, more malignantly, that he understood the nature of the threat but was, through omission, declaring a kind of neutrality in the conflict between the United States and its principal adversary.

It is true that Obama calibrated his rhetoric on the subject of terrorism to a degree even his closest advisers sometimes found frustrating. They hoped that, on occasion, he would at least acknowledge the legitimacy of Americans’ fears about Islamist terrorism before proceeding to explain those fears away. But Obama had a plausible rationale for avoiding the sort of language his eventual successor demanded that he deploy. He believed that any sort of rhetorical overreaction to the threat of Islamist terrorism by an American president would create panic, and would also spark a xenophobic response that would do damage to America’s image, and to Americans Muslims themselves.

[snip]

But the issue here is substantially larger than mere hypocrisy. Obama carefully measured his rhetoric in the war against Islamist terrorism because he hoped to avoid inserting the U.S. into the middle of an internecine struggle consuming another civilization. But the struggle in Charlottesville is a struggle within our own civilization, within Trump’s own civilization. It is precisely at moments like this that an American president should speak up directly on behalf of the American creed, on behalf of Americans who reject tribalism and seek pluralism, on behalf of the idea that blood-and-soil nationalism is antithetical to the American idea itself. Trump’s refusal to call out radical white terrorism for what it is, at precisely the moment America needs its leadership to take a unified stand against hatred, marks what might be the lowest moment of his presidency to date.

Whole article here: Why Won't Trump Call Out Radical White Terrorism?

----------------------------

Because if he does, he alienates at least 50% of his supporters.

He did call it out. Why didn't obama call out the violence of black lives matter and then why did he have them to the White House? And al sharpton, the racist, had been to the White House about 40 times......

 

[Si modo]

Mine is rational and yours is delusional.

Your post is as rational as a claim that ISIS is a "major part of [Obama's] base".[/QUOTE]

 

[Camp]

Mine is rational and yours is delusional.

Your post is as rational as a claim that ISIS is a "major part of [Obama's] base".

[/QUOTE]
David Duke gave a public statement declaring the alt right was a major part of trump's base. Duke is a leader of that faction and major spokesperson for it.

 

[Si modo]

Mine is rational and yours is delusional.

Your post is as rational as a claim that ISIS is a "major part of [Obama's] base".

David Duke gave a public statement declaring the alt right was a major part of trump's base. Duke is a leader of that faction and major spokesperson for it.

I don't follow David Duke. You do...and you cite him to support your rhetoric. Interesting.

 

[Camp]

Mine is rational and yours is delusional.

Your post is as rational as a claim that ISIS is a "major part of [Obama's] base".

David Duke gave a public statement declaring the alt right was a major part of trump's base. Duke is a leader of that faction and major spokesperson for it.

I don't follow David Duke. You do...and you cite him to support your rhetoric. Interesting.

You need not follow David Duke to know what he said. It was front page news and a top story covered on network news.
The post you butthurt snowflakes are whining about is based on what David Duke said. Neo Nazi David Duke bitch slapped trump and the cult followers are in a dilemma about how to respond.

 

[Si modo]

Mine is rational and yours is delusional.

Your post is as rational as a claim that ISIS is a "major part of [Obama's] base".

David Duke gave a public statement declaring the alt right was a major part of trump's base. Duke is a leader of that faction and major spokesperson for it.

I don't follow David Duke. You do...and you cite him to support your rhetoric. Interesting.

You need not follow David Duke to know what he said. It was front page news and a top story covered on network news.
The post you butthurt snowflakes are whining about is based on what David Duke said. Neo Nazi David Duke bitch slapped trump and the cult followers are in a dilemma about how to respond.

Yet, YOU cite David Duke to support your rhetoric. It's interesting that you do.

 

[jc456]

all double standards and hypocrisy from the left hourly in this country. kiss my ass bigots.

 

[blackhawk]

Because doing so could offend the white people who aren't radical terrorist and create more of them. Sound familiar?

 

[jc456]

Why Won't Trump Call Out Radical White Terrorism?

Because he's their leader. Duh!

so he was there?

 

[bodecea]

Trump handled it perfectly. No news here.

His alt-right supporters agree with you.

 

[jc456]

the issue is simple, libs stop trying to change the history of our country and you wouldn't have events like this.

 

[jc456]

Trump handled it perfectly. No news here.

His alt-right supporters agree with you.

all supporters do. hypocrite.

 

[bodecea]

On November 15, 2015, as the world grappled with the horrors of a multipronged ISIS attack in Paris, Donald Trump, who was then an improbable but officially declared candidate for the presidency, tweeted, “When will President Obama issue the words RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM? He can’t say it, and unless he will, the problem will not be solved!”

I raise the subject of this tweet, and the sentiment that motivated it, in light of President Trump’s remarkable reaction to the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, this weekend. “We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides,” he said. Trump, when presented with the chance to denounce, in plain, direct language, individuals who could fairly be described as “white supremacist terrorists,” or with some other equivalent formulation, instead resorted to euphemism and moral equivalence.

Trump’s position on the matter of President Obama’s anti-terrorism rhetoric did not place him outside the Republican mainstream. Obama’s critics argued throughout his presidency that his unwillingness to embrace the incantatory rhetoric of civilizational struggle—his reluctance to cast such groups as al-Qaeda and ISIS as vanguards of an all-encompassing ideological and theological challenge to the West—meant that, at the very least, he misunderstood the nature of the threat, or, more malignantly, that he understood the nature of the threat but was, through omission, declaring a kind of neutrality in the conflict between the United States and its principal adversary.

It is true that Obama calibrated his rhetoric on the subject of terrorism to a degree even his closest advisers sometimes found frustrating. They hoped that, on occasion, he would at least acknowledge the legitimacy of Americans’ fears about Islamist terrorism before proceeding to explain those fears away. But Obama had a plausible rationale for avoiding the sort of language his eventual successor demanded that he deploy. He believed that any sort of rhetorical overreaction to the threat of Islamist terrorism by an American president would create panic, and would also spark a xenophobic response that would do damage to America’s image, and to Americans Muslims themselves.

[snip]

But the issue here is substantially larger than mere hypocrisy. Obama carefully measured his rhetoric in the war against Islamist terrorism because he hoped to avoid inserting the U.S. into the middle of an internecine struggle consuming another civilization. But the struggle in Charlottesville is a struggle within our own civilization, within Trump’s own civilization. It is precisely at moments like this that an American president should speak up directly on behalf of the American creed, on behalf of Americans who reject tribalism and seek pluralism, on behalf of the idea that blood-and-soil nationalism is antithetical to the American idea itself. Trump’s refusal to call out radical white terrorism for what it is, at precisely the moment America needs its leadership to take a unified stand against hatred, marks what might be the lowest moment of his presidency to date.

Whole article here: Why Won't Trump Call Out Radical White Terrorism?

----------------------------

Because if he does, he alienates at least 50% of his supporters.

Hey SHYTFE, what is more dangerous to the country and the world? A few hundred white people protesting about a statue, or radical Islam and the oppression and terrorism that comes with it?

Ah...so driving a car thru a crowd is just "protesting about a statue"........gotcha!

 

[jc456]

Trump will not call out the domestic terrorist because he needs their support as a major part of his base. The racist supporters have let him know that he was elected with their help and trump knows without their support now his approval rating will drop into the twenty and even teen percentage points.
Trump does not have the courage to stand up to the racists who are a major factor in his base of support.

Your grasp of reality is non-existent ..

View attachment 143562

Mine is rational and yours is delusional.

how so? because it's what you think and your opinion? hmmmmm doesn't he have the same? so what makes yours better?

 

[rightwinger]

Once again, Trump is politically and morally tone deaf

Much like he did with his refusal to condemn David Duke, Trump will chime in days after his initial statement and say....Yes, I condemn Nazism

 

[bodecea]

Trump handled it perfectly. No news here.

His alt-right supporters agree with you.

all supporters do.

That's why so many GOP leaders stated as such, right?

 

[jc456]

Trump handled it perfectly. No news here.

His alt-right supporters agree with you.

all supporters do.

That's why so many GOP leaders stated as such, right?

they are being kiss asses. you said his supporters, last time I checked not all GOP'ers are.