And they in turn got it from Babylonian Jews, who obsessed over 'racial purity' from Ezra onward, if you want to make up links to the past. Babylonian Jews made Nazi racism look tame; ultra-Orthodox and Hasidim still do, claiming Jews are the ONLY humans, period. The goyim are merely animals who exist to be used by God to punish or reward Jews. lol
'Nazism' developed out of blending Darwinism with eugenics and Bismarck's plan of generating a sense of 'nationalism' in the newly formed 'Germany' from a hodgepodge of disparate states and fiefs after the defeat of France from the 1870's onward. It was an exercise in pseudo-intellectual 'scientific rationalism' combining with 'nation building' political theory propaganda, and mass media played a key role in that by the 1930's. As it evolved, the results weren't quite what Bismarck and Max Weber hoped for. Strasser, Goebbels, and Himmler were early fans of 'national Bolshevism', as was Karl Radek.
Mad Science Meets Halfwits With High Self-Esteem, and real life ruins it for them. The Fatal Conceit by F.A. Hayek is well worth a read by both left and right wing 'rationalists'.
The National Bolshevik project of figures such as Niekisch and Paetel was typically presented as just another strand of Bolshevism by the Nazi Party, and was thus viewed just as negatively and as part of a "Jewish conspiracy".[26] After Hitler's rise to power, many National Bolsheviks were arrested and imprisoned or fled the country.
Despite opposition to National Bolshevism, usually on the grounds that it tends to take Marxist influence, a similarly syncretic, but non-Marxist, tendency had developed in the left-wing of the Nazi Party. This was represented by what has now come to be known as Strasserism. Initially one of the stronger factions of the NSDAP, the left-wing slowly started to lose power to Adolf Hitler's faction; this culminated in much of the wing splitting off to form the Black Front, whereas the rest would be purged in the Night of the Long Knives.[26]
National Bolshevism, also known as Nazbolism or Nazbol, is a neo-fascist and Third positionist ideology that supposedly combines far-right and far-left positions.[2] The origin of National Bolshevism can be traced back to the years following the Russian Revolution, when nationalist groups...
National Bolshevism, or Nazbol for short is a political ideology. It combines parts of the far left and far right. In economics, it’s very leftist wish to form an economic merger between central planning and syndicalism. However, on social issues, it’s very right wing. It wishes for...
During the 1930s, Stalin and his entourage rehabilitated famous names from the Russian national past in a propaganda campaign designed to mobilize Soviet society for the coming war. Legendary heroes like Aleksandr Nevskii and epic events like the Battle of Borodino quickly eclipsed more...
scholarship.richmond.edu
Robert Massie's book Dreadought, the arms race kicked off by Wilhelm II, has a decent synopsis of the development of the 'German National Identity' agenda and how it was implemented.
And they in turn got it from Babylonian Jews, who obsessed over 'racial purity' from Ezra onward, if you want to make up links to the past. Babylonian Jews made Nazi racism look tame; ultra-Orthodox and Hasidim still do, claiming Jews are the ONLY humans, period. The goyim are merely animals who exist to be used by God to punish or reward Jews. lol
Mr. Smith aka john doe----you are imbued with islamo nazi propaganda. As to "babylonian
jews" ain't even one left----the islamo nazis
PROVED their MURDERSOUS SUPERIORITY. An interesting remnant is ITAMAR BEN GVIR. There are always survivors
Yes it is weird, I think racial supremacy ideas, anti-miscgenation laws, racial laws etc. and all that stuff was much more common for the english speaking world then for the german speaking world. But I think the difference is that nazism is socialist that means collectivist and with a authoritarian Leader, Hitler. English dont believe so much in that. They have strong parliamantery, capitalist, and liberal tradition, despite being racist.
I think you might like a few videos from a youtuber called whatifalthist, he makes very 'broad strokes' videos on history, and he has discussed this kind of thing before. I think he tries to argue that the predominant family structures impact these kinds of developments.
I'm not sure which videos exactly, but I think he is basing things off the works like this one, by Emanuel Todd, who I believe tries to answer the question you're interested in in this book: 'The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structure and Social Systems'
I think you might like a few videos from a youtuber called whatifalthist, he makes very 'broad strokes' videos on history, and he has discussed this kind of thing before. I think he tries to argue that the predominant family structures impact these kinds of developments.
I'm not sure which videos exactly, but I think he is basing things off the works like this one, by Emanuel Todd, who I believe tries to answer the question you're interested in in this book: 'The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structure and Social Systems'
I think you might like a few videos from a youtuber called whatifalthist, he makes very 'broad strokes' videos on history, and he has discussed this kind of thing before. I think he tries to argue that the predominant family structures impact these kinds of developments.
I'm not sure which videos exactly, but I think he is basing things off the works like this one, by Emanuel Todd, who I believe tries to answer the question you're interested in in this book: 'The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structure and Social Systems'
They were arrested for mocking the way Hitler ate asparagus. That is what happened in Germany, according to a report published on July 17, 1935. Hitler was a part-time vegetarian and had a fondness…
They were arrested for mocking the way Hitler ate asparagus. That is what happened in Germany, according to a report published on July 17, 1935. Hitler was a part-time vegetarian and had a fondness…
They were arrested for mocking the way Hitler ate asparagus. That is what happened in Germany, according to a report published on July 17, 1935. Hitler was a part-time vegetarian and had a fondness…
Perhaps you can research that hypothesis, write a book about it and make somewhat of a name for yourself.
Until then, you labeling this as 'nonsense' lacks any weight, even if some in the crowd here may fall for such 'thinking'. Maybe if you bothered to engage with the content your criticisms might matter, but you certainly lack the good faith to do that.
Perhaps you can research that hypothesis, write a book about it and make somewhat of a name for yourself.
Until then, you labeling this as 'nonsense' lacks any weight, even if some in the crowd here may fall for such 'thinking'. Maybe if you bothered to engage with the content your criticisms might matter, but you certainly lack the good faith to do that.
lol nobody cares about your silly ranting. We know exactly the sequence of events that led to Nazism, it's well documented, and has nothing to do with navel gazing fantasies re 'family structures' and fabulist Marxist deconstructions of social history. There is a lot more hard evidence for the asparagus theory than your posturing silliness.
I was just going to make a joke, but it turns out Nazis and asparagus really are a thing. Germans are nuts about it, particularly white asparagus. Hitler was a vegan, and fond of it. So was Rommel. Google Nazi asparagus.
I was just going to make a joke, but it turns out Nazis and asparagus really are a thing. Germans are nuts about it, particularly white asparagus. Hitler was a vegan, and fond of it. So was Rommel. Google Nazi asparagus.
"Somoza is a son of a bitch, sure, but he's our son of a bitch" Roosevelt. 1939.
We must always remember that fascism is not something in itself, it's a form of capitalism.
That's the only reason why the West went to war with fascism, when it realized that it had raised a dangerous competitor, ready to conquer them too
"Somoza is a son of a bitch, sure, but he's our son of a bitch" Roosevelt. 1939.
We must always remember that fascism is not something in itself, it's a form of capitalism.
That's the only reason why the West went to war with fascism, when it realized that it had raised a dangerous competitor, ready to conquer them too
And the Soviet Union was a form of capitalism. So what? Even their propaganda posters and statues all look the same artists who did the Germans' posters and statues. They are distinctions without a difference. The difference is who is implementing polices and why, and clearly FDR's were far better implementation than Hitler's and Stalin's. He was elected four times, and not some self-appointed dictator like Hitler and your hero Stalin and his successors.
In my opinion the French were more likely candidates to take antisemitism to a murderous level than Germans before WW2. But Hitler, who was Austrian, picked Germany to implement his insanity and the rest is history. Read about the collaboration of the French Vichy government. I'm saying the Holocaust would not have happened without Hitler as the driving force behind it. The French or Brits didn't have a man like Hitler to contaminate their minds with irrational hate. The economic conditions in Germany at the time made Germany easy pickings for a lunatic to exploit.
Nazism is the German form of fascism. Mussolini defined what fascism meant to him as a merger of state and corporatism with an authoritarian leader.
Yes it is weird, I think racial supremacy ideas, anti-miscgenation laws, racial laws etc. and all that stuff was much more common for the english speaking world then for the german speaking world. But I think the difference is that nazism is socialist that means collectivist and with a authoritarian Leader, Hitler. English dont believe so much in that. They have strong parliamantery, capitalist, and liberal tradition, despite being racist.
You are unwittingly taking the wrong view that Edmund Burke so well mocked.
England had Jesus and the French did not. Hence the brutal murders of women and children, the guillotining of nuns and priests --- and the final killing of Robespierre .
No, if you don't have transcendence in your life , you are no different than a dog.
www.goodreads.com
www.sandiegouniontribune.com
40percentgerman.com
