Why the IG report has been taking so long

[eagle7_31]

Senator Grassley Tweets Warning About FISA Investigation – Holds Unique Perspective on Deep State Motives for a Cover-Up…

And why I have been taking a wait and see attitude. I have not doubt BO, Hillary etc were using the FBI and intel agencies against Trump. There has been enough brought to light so far to confirm suspicions I have had for sometime. However proving legally is another matter. Most (but not all) dems don't care if there is no legal evidence against Trump as several investigations plus the Mueller report have shown thus far. They want him out of office just because they hate him, period, no other reason. 2016 took them by surprise and they can't get over it. Most of this board's left wingers are proof of that.

 

[Stratford57]

I already posted this in some other thread but it looks like some of you may be interested to see how well Russians understand what's really is going on in USA. And they are definitely on the Trump's side.

Sept 29, Alexey Pushkov: Dems’ goal is to topple Trump. These past two years they’ve been in a non-stop hysteria. They started up with finding a porn start and when that didn’t work they decided to look into allegations of collusions with Russia. They have been investigating that for 2 years, 32.4 million dollars have been spent on the Mueller investigation and at the end Mueller said there was not any sufficient evidence to support the allegation that Trump has colluded with Russia. So, the collusion accusation was off the mark. The narrative that Russia meddled in US election has not gone away but it is getting old, doesn’t touch the nerve any more, it’s not considered to be enough bate any more to catch such a big fish as Trump, he’s off this hook already. Only Hillary Clinton doesn’t seem to leave this topic alone.

So, they invented a new theory. And they appeared to have found that pretext initiating impeachment inquiry, nothing will come out of it of course. There is no doubt the Senate will not give Trump away.

Why are the Democrats are doing what they are doing then? By playing this card they seek to weaken Trump before the elections: the voters will “know” that the president has done something and nobody will look at the substance of the claim and the claim is completely unfounded. Moreover, f Trump chooses the right line of conduct (and I think he might). It’s Biden who will lose the most.

Details in the video of Russian political talk show “The Great Game” (already interpreted into English)
The Great Game. 29.09.2019

Aleksey Pushkov - Wikipedia

 

[beautress]

I already posted this in some other thread but it looks like some of you may be interested to see how well Russians understand what's really is going on in USA. And they are definitely on the Trump's side.

Sept 29, Alexey Pushkov: Dems’ goal is to topple Trump. These past two years they’ve been in a non-stop hysteria. They started up with finding a porn start and when that didn’t work they decided to look into allegations of collusions with Russia. They have been investigating that for 2 years, 32.4 million dollars have been spent on the Mueller investigation and at the end Mueller said there was not any sufficient evidence to support the allegation that Trump has colluded with Russia. So, the collusion accusation was off the mark. The narrative that Russia meddled in US election has not gone away but it is getting old, doesn’t touch the nerve any more, it’s not considered to be enough bate any more to catch such a big fish as Trump, he’s off this hook already. Only Hillary Clinton doesn’t seem to leave this topic alone.

So, they invented a new theory. And they appeared to have found that pretext initiating impeachment inquiry, nothing will come out of it of course. There is no doubt the Senate will not give Trump away.

Why are the Democrats are doing what they are doing then? By playing this card they seek to weaken Trump before the elections: the voters will “know” that the president has done something and nobody will look at the substance of the claim and the claim is completely unfounded. Moreover, f Trump chooses the right line of conduct (and I think he might). It’s Biden who will lose the most.

Details in the video of Russian political talk show “The Great Game” (already interpreted into English)
The Great Game. 29.09.2019

Aleksey Pushkov - Wikipedia

You'd think the Democrats were using the opportunity to elicit statements like "We should line up the Democrats and shoot 'em," etc. Unfortunately for them, we resisted doing that, and we never will do it.

 

[dudmuck]

Senator Grassley Tweets Warning About FISA Investigation – Holds Unique Perspective on Deep State Motives for a Cover-Up…

And why I have been taking a wait and see attitude. I have not doubt BO, Hillary etc were using the FBI and intel agencies against Trump. There has been enough brought to light so far to confirm suspicions I have had for sometime. However proving legally is another matter. Most (but not all) dems don't care if there is no legal evidence against Trump as several investigations plus the Mueller report have shown thus far. They want him out of office just because they hate him, period, no other reason. 2016 took them by surprise and they can't get over it. Most of this board's left wingers are proof of that.

Carter Page was open about his work for the Kremlin. Russian spies confirmed he was an asset and an idiot. Those warrants were renewed multiple times by the Trump DOJ. This is a farce. It's criminal abuse of the office.

I suspect this IG report would be just like the Nunes memo. Big on expectations, but turns out to be nothing of substance. If the IG had something, they'd be running to the press.

Manufacturing crimes is hard.

 

[DJT for Life]

Senator Grassley Tweets Warning About FISA Investigation – Holds Unique Perspective on Deep State Motives for a Cover-Up…

And why I have been taking a wait and see attitude. I have not doubt BO, Hillary etc were using the FBI and intel agencies against Trump. There has been enough brought to light so far to confirm suspicions I have had for sometime. However proving legally is another matter. Most (but not all) dems don't care if there is no legal evidence against Trump as several investigations plus the Mueller report have shown thus far. They want him out of office just because they hate him, period, no other reason. 2016 took them by surprise and they can't get over it. Most of this board's left wingers are proof of that.

Carter Page was open about his work for the Kremlin. Russian spies confirmed he was an asset and an idiot. Those warrants were renewed multiple times by the Trump DOJ. This is a farce. It's criminal abuse of the office.

I suspect this IG report would be just like the Nunes memo. Big on expectations, but turns out to be nothing of substance. If the IG had something, they'd be running to the press.

Manufacturing crimes is hard.

It's actually been coordinated very well.

Horowitz will have his report released next week. Durham has switched from a "review" to a criminal investigation. The running to the press will
begin next week. Of course, the Press is starting to smear Barr and Durham this evening. They know the end is near. They also know the
narrative is gonna change big-time.

Durham is convening a Grand Jury. All of Obama's top Intel officials have some real issues on their hands. It was reported tonight
that some of the CIA agents interviewed earlier by Durham have all employed Criminal defense attorney's.

 

[the other mike]

Senator Grassley Tweets Warning About FISA Investigation – Holds Unique Perspective on Deep State Motives for a Cover-Up…

And why I have been taking a wait and see attitude. I have not doubt BO, Hillary etc were using the FBI and intel agencies against Trump. There has been enough brought to light so far to confirm suspicions I have had for sometime. However proving legally is another matter. Most (but not all) dems don't care if there is no legal evidence against Trump as several investigations plus the Mueller report have shown thus far. They want him out of office just because they hate him, period, no other reason. 2016 took them by surprise and they can't get over it. Most of this board's left wingers are proof of that.

It's been a coordinated, orchestrated ambush on this president ...unprecedented propaganda and scripted narrative in the MSM like we've really never seen before. No excuse, but most of the left here are just brainwashed by an onslaught of lies and disinformation....when the indictments and/or Senate subpoenas start emerging, a lot of people will come around. They can only pull the hoax off for so long.

 

[the other mike]

Here's another good example of dishonest MSM coverage.

 

[the other mike]

This is new. ( and not Hannity or Tucker )

 

[AntonToo]

there is no legal evidence against Trump as several investigations plus the Mueller report have shown thus far. .

No legal evidence? What fucking planet are you on?

Special Council's report Volume II is busting at the seams with evidence of Obstruction of Justice and Trump was just caught with his pants down in broad daylight, leveraging American foreign policy to solicit political campaign contributions from other countries.

Napolitano: Mueller report shows 'classic obstruction of justice'

Top U.S. envoy ties Trump directly to Ukraine quid pro quo

 

[the other mike]

Susan Rice just fucked herself.

 

[AntonToo]

Yep, Hannity is a blowhard moron - trial happens in the Senate, not House

...what else did you want to show us?

 

[the other mike]

Yep, Hannity is blowhard moron...what else did you want to show us?

You pussies can't handle the truth.
Now run along and polish your boyfriend's nob or something.

 

[AntonToo]

Yep, Hannity is blowhard moron...what else did you want to show us?

You pussies can't handle the truth.
Now run along and polish your boyfriend's nob or something.

The dick-hard truth is that the trial happens in the Senate, not the House.

Which part of that do you think I can't handle?

I've got bad news for you idiot, you better sit down - just because a nutbag tool like Hannity told you something DOES NOT MEAN IT'S TRUE.

 

[Hossfly]

there is no legal evidence against Trump as several investigations plus the Mueller report have shown thus far. .

No legal evidence? What fucking planet are you on?

Special Council's report Volume II is busting at the seams with evidence of Obstruction of Justice and Trump was just caught with his pants down in broad daylight, leveraging American foreign policy to solicit political campaign contributions from other countries.



Napolitano: Mueller report shows 'classic obstruction of justice'

Top U.S. envoy ties Trump directly to Ukraine quid pro quo

A Grand Jury is being convened. That means the jig is up. The adults are taking over.

 

[AntonToo]

there is no legal evidence against Trump as several investigations plus the Mueller report have shown thus far. .

No legal evidence? What fucking planet are you on?

Special Council's report Volume II is busting at the seams with evidence of Obstruction of Justice and Trump was just caught with his pants down in broad daylight, leveraging American foreign policy to solicit political campaign contributions from other countries.



Napolitano: Mueller report shows 'classic obstruction of justice'

Top U.S. envoy ties Trump directly to Ukraine quid pro quo

A Grand Jury is being convened. That means the jig is up. The adults are taking over.

Promises promises, meanwhile all you got to show for it is deep-blue balls.

 

[the other mike]

Watch the way CNN spins it.

 

[Hossfly]

Watch the way CNN spins it.

Spin is the right word. Clapper is in panic mode.

 

[the other mike]

Watch the way CNN spins it.

Spin is the right word. Clapper is in panic mode.

Did you notice how they spent 5 minutes talking about Mifsud, but isn't it funny that they don't
ever bother to mention the guy's been missing for almost 2 years?

 

[dudmuck]

Senator Grassley Tweets Warning About FISA Investigation – Holds Unique Perspective on Deep State Motives for a Cover-Up…

And why I have been taking a wait and see attitude. I have not doubt BO, Hillary etc were using the FBI and intel agencies against Trump. There has been enough brought to light so far to confirm suspicions I have had for sometime. However proving legally is another matter. Most (but not all) dems don't care if there is no legal evidence against Trump as several investigations plus the Mueller report have shown thus far. They want him out of office just because they hate him, period, no other reason. 2016 took them by surprise and they can't get over it. Most of this board's left wingers are proof of that.

Carter Page was open about his work for the Kremlin. Russian spies confirmed he was an asset and an idiot. Those warrants were renewed multiple times by the Trump DOJ. This is a farce. It's criminal abuse of the office.

I suspect this IG report would be just like the Nunes memo. Big on expectations, but turns out to be nothing of substance. If the IG had something, they'd be running to the press.

Manufacturing crimes is hard.

It's actually been coordinated very well.

Horowitz will have his report released next week. Durham has switched from a "review" to a criminal investigation. The running to the press will
begin next week. Of course, the Press is starting to smear Barr and Durham this evening. They know the end is near. They also know the
narrative is gonna change big-time.

Durham is convening a Grand Jury. All of Obama's top Intel officials have some real issues on their hands. It was reported tonight
that some of the CIA agents interviewed earlier by Durham have all employed Criminal defense attorney's.

Translation: Durham having learned to his dismay that there exists no evidence of wrongdoing stateside by the Intel community has now expanded his search in a Hail Mary attempt to find any evidence that can help his boss.

Origins explained: The Russians helped a presidential candidate and that candidate welcomed the help and meet with the Russians.

the president openly admitted to removing the person investigating it (Comey) because he was investigating it. That's how you get a special investigation dropped on you. No real mystery.

Investigating the investigators is Textbook dictator.
Especially consider how many convictions Mueller made with a seriously limited scope, the assumption that a president cannot be indicted, and the full knowledge that pushing for truth would just lead to stonewalling and unpalatable delays.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It was reported tonight
that some of the CIA agents interviewed earlier by Durham have all employed Criminal defense attorney's.

reported by whom?