Why the hysteria over only 4-5% of the population?

[daws101]

infer and imply are interchangeable, in this case you intended the same outcome..

You inferred Stats is a ***, I implied you're an idiot:

imply vs. infer Choose Your Words Vocabulary.com"]imply vs. infer Choose Your Words Vocabulary.com

is your quote function broken?

Stop being an asshole.

is see you fixed it thanks

 

[daws101]

could you be more off topic?

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

Says the person who is switching the topic to an attack on me.

false! not attacking you just point out the disingenuousness of your posts.

**** you asshole.

true. but an honest one.

 

[daws101]

again you presented nothing to waste time answering except with derision...

You don't believe STD exacerbation and Ferguson and Baltimore culture are significant? You don't think that contributing to those conditions is a bad thing?

could you be more off topic?

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

The thread is about the alleged irrelevance of homosexuals and I'm pointing out relevant facts. What is so difficult to understand?

false the "facts" you so often bring up are not facts but propaganda.

 

[daws101]

Based on the 2013 NHIS data [collected in 2013 from 34,557 adults aged 18 and over], 96.6% of adults identified as straight, 1.6% identified as gay or lesbian, and 0.7% identified as bisexual. The remaining 1.1% of adults identified as “something else[]” [0.2%,] stated “I don’t know the answer[]” [0.4%] or refused to provide an answer [0.6%].


More specifically, 1.8 percent of men self-identify as gay and 0.4 percent as bisexual, and 1.5 percent of women self-identify as lesbian and 0.9 percent as bisexual.


Who is hysterical over marriage equality?


U.S. Adults Estimate That 25% of Americans Are Gay or Lesbian

Those with lower incomes, the less educated, women, and young people give the highest estimates



Even if the "less educated" were right, marriage equality does not impact their lives, so why do they care? Why do they want Big Government to control the lives of these people?

What about politicians? Surely they know their monstrous bills making discrimination legal would affect only 5% of the population, so why do they harp on it?

My own opinion is that RW politicians pander to the fundie nutters because they figure they'll only lose that 5% of the vote.

What about posters here? Why do they get so hysterical over 5% of the population? Why do they want to deny them the same rights the rest of us enjoy?

Why did the LW politicitians vote against ghey marriage for hundreds of years? What changed?

I suspect you really mean "liberals" and many did not change. They believed in equality and "live and let live" and they still do.

Other people, both left and right, have grown, evolved, educated themselves and realize there is not reason to deny equality to ANY portion of the population.

Others do indeed seem to believe it will rub off.

Then there are those are terrified of their own sexual feelings ...

Also, note that same sex marriage is not new and that what some say is "traditional" marriage really never existed.

Agreed. It's not a left / right thing. It's an authoritarian / fear thing. Fear that if we let the gays have civil rights their gayness will infect the population. They are scared.

I smell disingenuousness !

You would also be incorrect. RKMBrown has made his position rather plain when it comes to gays around here.

I disagree!

 

[daws101]

again you presented nothing to waste time answering except with derision...

You don't believe STD exacerbation and Ferguson and Baltimore culture are significant? You don't think that contributing to those conditions is a bad thing?

could you be more off topic?

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

Well the experiment liberals did on black families was a total failure. The same will be proven with queer parenting. Why do liberals like to abuse kids with failed experiments?

another completely irrelevant post...

 

[jknowgood]

You don't believe STD exacerbation and Ferguson and Baltimore culture are significant? You don't think that contributing to those conditions is a bad thing?

could you be more off topic?

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

Well the experiment liberals did on black families was a total failure. The same will be proven with queer parenting. Why do liberals like to abuse kids with failed experiments?

another completely irrelevant post...

I know it's irrelevant to a liberal, because it's the truth.

 

[daws101]

"Why should everyone be forced to subsidize these people if their numbers are so irrelevant?"

Who is "subsidizing" same sex marriage?



Same sex marriage was recorded as far back as the 13th century.

Legal marriage forces subsidies in the name of tax beaks and joint claims to health insurance.
No homo couple were ever the birth parents of a human child.

"What percentage of children being intentionally denied the human right to be raised by their actual parents is OK with you?"

How does marriage equality 'deny children their [birth] parents'?

If we're going to deny some people tax breaks and health claims, we should deny all people the same.

Step parents are not biological parents either. You want to penalize them?

Step parents who exist as a consequence is very different from intent. Why should we deny people who deserve tax breaks?

So, according to you, some parents and some couples deserve tax breaks and health care but others do not, and its all according to some arbitrary idea you have of what constitutes both parenting and marriage.

Lucky for all of us that you don't get to make those rules cuz that's just plain nuts.

"What percentage of children being intentionally denied the human right to be raised by their actual parents is OK with you?"

How does marriage equality 'deny children their [birth] parents'?

Natural procreative design is not arbitrary.

really? procreation and parenting are two different things
being able produce offspring is no guarantee of stability or love..

 

[daws101]

could you be more off topic?

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

Well the experiment liberals did on black families was a total failure. The same will be proven with queer parenting. Why do liberals like to abuse kids with failed experiments?

another completely irrelevant post...

I know it's irrelevant to a liberal, because it's the truth.

truth is relative, fact is not, you have no facts to back YOUR racist and homophobic bullshit .

 

[jknowgood]

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

Well the experiment liberals did on black families was a total failure. The same will be proven with queer parenting. Why do liberals like to abuse kids with failed experiments?

another completely irrelevant post...

I know it's irrelevant to a liberal, because it's the truth.

truth is relative, fact is not, you have no facts to back YOUR racist and homophobic bullshit .

Fact is before welfare blacks families were close.

 

[RKMBrown]

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

Says the person who is switching the topic to an attack on me.

false! not attacking you just point out the disingenuousness of your posts.

**** you asshole.

true. but an honest one.

Believe it or not, you're not the only honest asshole around.

 

[AmericanFirst]

M

Based on the 2013 NHIS data [collected in 2013 from 34,557 adults aged 18 and over], 96.6% of adults identified as straight, 1.6% identified as gay or lesbian, and 0.7% identified as bisexual. The remaining 1.1% of adults identified as “something else[]” [0.2%,] stated “I don’t know the answer[]” [0.4%] or refused to provide an answer [0.6%].


More specifically, 1.8 percent of men self-identify as gay and 0.4 percent as bisexual, and 1.5 percent of women self-identify as lesbian and 0.9 percent as bisexual.


Who is hysterical over marriage equality?


U.S. Adults Estimate That 25% of Americans Are Gay or Lesbian

Those with lower incomes, the less educated, women, and young people give the highest estimates



Even if the "less educated" were right, marriage equality does not impact their lives, so why do they care? Why do they want Big Government to control the lives of these people?

What about politicians? Surely they know their monstrous bills making discrimination legal would affect only 5% of the population, so why do they harp on it?

My own opinion is that RW politicians pander to the fundie nutters because they figure they'll only lose that 5% of the vote.

What about posters here? Why do they get so hysterical over 5% of the population? Why do they want to deny them the same rights the rest of us enjoy?

Maybe because those very few abnormal people want to shove it down everybody's throats.

You guys sure like to use that term.

Truth hurts, the Bible is very painful to satans children. Take some pain meds.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Legal marriage forces subsidies in the name of tax beaks and joint claims to health insurance.
No homo couple were ever the birth parents of a human child.

"What percentage of children being intentionally denied the human right to be raised by their actual parents is OK with you?"

How does marriage equality 'deny children their [birth] parents'?

If we're going to deny some people tax breaks and health claims, we should deny all people the same.

Step parents are not biological parents either. You want to penalize them?

Step parents who exist as a consequence is very different from intent. Why should we deny people who deserve tax breaks?

So, according to you, some parents and some couples deserve tax breaks and health care but others do not, and its all according to some arbitrary idea you have of what constitutes both parenting and marriage.

Lucky for all of us that you don't get to make those rules cuz that's just plain nuts.

"What percentage of children being intentionally denied the human right to be raised by their actual parents is OK with you?"

How does marriage equality 'deny children their [birth] parents'?

Natural procreative design is not arbitrary.

Which takes you right back to step parenting.

Step kids aren't biological offspring either.

No matter what the "argument", shine a bright light on it and it falls apart.

Bottom line is, you think its icky and you think you have the right to impose your will on others.

You make stuff up to fit your biases.
Step kids are a anomalous. That is you using the anecdotal to justify a problem. Like George Burns smoking cigars every day and living to 100 proves that smoking is good for you.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

You don't believe STD exacerbation and Ferguson and Baltimore culture are significant? You don't think that contributing to those conditions is a bad thing?

could you be more off topic?

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

The thread is about the alleged irrelevance of homosexuals and I'm pointing out relevant facts. What is so difficult to understand?

false the "facts" you so often bring up are not facts but propaganda.

I rely on the empirical. You resort to propaganda.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Legal marriage forces subsidies in the name of tax beaks and joint claims to health insurance.
No homo couple were ever the birth parents of a human child.

"What percentage of children being intentionally denied the human right to be raised by their actual parents is OK with you?"

How does marriage equality 'deny children their [birth] parents'?

If we're going to deny some people tax breaks and health claims, we should deny all people the same.

Step parents are not biological parents either. You want to penalize them?

Step parents who exist as a consequence is very different from intent. Why should we deny people who deserve tax breaks?

So, according to you, some parents and some couples deserve tax breaks and health care but others do not, and its all according to some arbitrary idea you have of what constitutes both parenting and marriage.

Lucky for all of us that you don't get to make those rules cuz that's just plain nuts.

"What percentage of children being intentionally denied the human right to be raised by their actual parents is OK with you?"

How does marriage equality 'deny children their [birth] parents'?

Natural procreative design is not arbitrary.

really? procreation and parenting are two different things
being able produce offspring is no guarantee of stability or love..

But providing the actual parents is an empirically proven necessity.
And are you suggesting that homo parenting is a guarantee of stability and love?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

Well the experiment liberals did on black families was a total failure. The same will be proven with queer parenting. Why do liberals like to abuse kids with failed experiments?

another completely irrelevant post...

I know it's irrelevant to a liberal, because it's the truth.

truth is relative, fact is not, you have no facts to back YOUR racist and homophobic bullshit .

It's not racist and the facts are there. Have been for decades. Increases in unstructured families directly coincide with failing schools and higher crime.This transcends poverty and socioeconomics.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

Well the experiment liberals did on black families was a total failure. The same will be proven with queer parenting. Why do liberals like to abuse kids with failed experiments?

another completely irrelevant post...

I know it's irrelevant to a liberal, because it's the truth.

truth is relative, fact is not, you have no facts to back YOUR racist and homophobic bullshit .

Fact is before welfare blacks families were close.

Before civil rights the structured families among blacks were at 80%. Post great society it's at 25%.

 

[AmericanFirst]

could you be more off topic?

You don't understand that?

yes ...that's why I said it's off topic.
you are attempting to switch the topic from gay issues/ parenting to stds and black single parent homes.
if that's what you want to ***** about ,than start another thread.

Well the experiment liberals did on black families was a total failure. The same will be proven with queer parenting. Why do liberals like to abuse kids with failed experiments?

another completely irrelevant post...

I know it's irrelevant to a liberal, because it's the truth.

Libtards hate the truth, hence their outrage when right is pointed out on this board.

 

[hipeter924]

Because they went crazy over interracial marriage too, and this is just the new in thing for the GOP to hate.

Personally I prefer trends that have more meaning in my life, like interior decorations.

 

[RKMBrown]

Because they went crazy over interracial marriage too, and this is just the new in thing for the GOP to hate.

Personally I prefer trends that have more meaning in my life, like interior decorations.

Yeah cause the libtards have never been against gay marriage...



oh... yeah uhmm...

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Because they went crazy over interracial marriage too, and this is just the new in thing for the GOP to hate.

Personally I prefer trends that have more meaning in my life, like interior decorations.

You are so out of touch, conservative. Get with it and progress a little.