why some are against the assault rifle ban is the same reason libbs protect late term abortion .

[M14 Shooter]

Your arguments are pathetic. A 8 year old could do better.
I own guns. Probably more than you.

All four of your statements, above, are lies.

You are an asshole.

None of this changes the fact all four of your statements are lies.

We STILL wait for the proof for your claim that the AWB reduced the number of deaths.
Well?
I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

I posted a link,.

What's that?
YOU cannot prove your claim that the AWB reduced the number of deaths?
No surprise.
I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The fact remains, ARs and the like are sporting rifles nothing more nothing less

Anti-gun loons see the AR15 as the biggest threat to their dream of the state having a monopoly on force.
Thus, their incessant, and inane, attempts to ban it.

 

[skookerasbil]

Assault rifle bans are st00pid. What do they accomplish? Except for making gun grabbers feel all warm and fuzzy?

 

[2aguy]

So do you actually think that it makes your posts valid the more you post it or are you so stupid that you forgot yopu pasted it already.

Please - tell us again why you believe correlation proves causation.
I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

Correlation provides a guideline.

Limit access to assault rifles, body count goes down
Remove these limits & they skyrocket.

Lets hear why there is no causal relationship. What other factor made this happen?

Moron....they limited access and the body count didn't go down...

The preferred weapon for mass shootings is the hand gun because you can conceal it....and you can carry several if you want.

You don't know what you are talking about...actual research that you were given links to, say you are an idiot and don't know what you are talking about.

 

[2aguy]

You are wrong......actual research shows you are wrong......

**** off. Gun Boy.

I don;t need any more of your dishonest horseshit.

The AWB helped reduce deaths in mas shootings,

But hey,. tell. ne again how assault type weapons don't add to the body count.

The ability to fire 100 rounds or more as fast as you pull the trigger in a accurate rifle has no value in the body count

No...it didn't....and no matter how often you post that it did, it doesn't change the truth.

Gilroy....3 dead, you moron...rifle...

Dayton...9 dead...rifle.....you moron.

Russian polytechnic school....20 dead, 40 injured....tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.

Luby's cafe...2 pistols...24 dead.

Virginia Tech...32 killed, 2 pistols.

Navy Yard shooting...12 dead, pump action shotgun...

It isn't the gun in a mass public shooting, you mope.....it is the time the killer has to murder unarmed people before someone points a gun at him.....

1) So you thionk other wea[omns atre better thsan assault rifles, why do you want them

2) Reducing mass shootings is the goal. No one siaid a ban would eliminate them

3) Parkland/Sandy Hook. Did you forget these? Or are you ass dishonest assfuck?

Gilroy was stopped in 30 seconds. He still killed 3. You are a ******* idiot & should not be permitted to own a gun.

The situation dictates the weapon....you don't get to make that choice for another person.

The rifles you want banned are not Assault rifles, they are civilian and police rifles...the weapons you call "assault" rifles have a selector switch for fully automatic or 3 round burst fire...the weapons you keep talking about don't have that.

A rifle in a self defense situation, depending on the situation is better than a hand gun..... you can add a light, better sites, a laser, and it is a declaration of being a serious gun owner. A woman with a 5 shot snub nose facing one or more criminals might be tested by those criminals. If she presents an AR-15 confidently, they will be much less likely to test her.

The ban wouldn't eliminate any of them...they will simply use hand guns, the most popular gun for mass shootings, shotguns, and they will seek even easier prey.

Parkland....18 dead...... Russian Polytechnic with a tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun 20 dead and 40 injured....... you lose. Virginia Tech, 2 pistols, 32 dead...Luby's cafe, 24 dead, 2 pistols.....

Sandy Hook.....he chose that gun free school and the grade level he attacked because he didn't want resisitance to the attack...in fact, he killed himself as soon as he heard the police sirens......and if he didn't have the AR-15 you moron, he could have killed just as many small children with one or more hand guns or shotguns....you dope.

As far as Gilroy, I am showing you that it isn't the weapon that matters...you dope...it is how much free time in the gun free zone the killer has before someone points a gun at him and makes him stop shooting unarmed people....that is why Gilroy, even with a rifle and magazines...killed 3, while the Russian Polytechnic shooter killed 20 and injured 40 with a tube fed, no magazine, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....

You don't know what you are talking about...

Shove your definition argument up your ass,

If assault riifles ain't worth shit as you keep arguing, why do you care if they are banned???

When you have to go back nearly 30 years for an example, I think you already lost the argument.

In Gilroy 3 dead in 3o seconds. Now pretend that having a semi automatic had nothing to do with it. Three dead but he fired a lot more bullets all in 30 seconds.

If the ficking assaukt rifle is nit an advanmtage, why fp you want rthjemn

You can't keep arguing that they provide no advantage & then clain you need them for self defense.

You argument is ******* stupid.

Because, asshat....... they are just normal, civilian and police rifles. They operate the same way as all the other rifles that aren't lever action, bolt action or pump action...and if you ass clowns are allowed to ban them, you will come back and demand all semi-automatic weapons, including revolvers, pistols, shotguns and all other semi-auto rifles be banned...since they all operate the same way...

It is bait and switch with you lying asshats...

Moron....as you have been told, it isn't the weapon, it is the free time the killer has in a gun free zone shooting unarmed people that determines the death count. As soon as you get someone with a gun pointing it at them or shooting them, the killing stops....

That is why, asshat....

Gilroy.... Rifle with magazine...3 dead.....stopped by a gun.

Russian Polytechnic school shooting.... no rifle, no magazine.... tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.... 20 killed 40 injured...because the Russian police took forever to get there...

Virginia Tech....32 killed, no rifle, 2 pistols......

Luby's cafe...2 pistols....24 killed....

that is why you don't know what you are talking about....

 

[2aguy]

You are wrong......actual research shows you are wrong......

**** off. Gun Boy.

I don;t need any more of your dishonest horseshit.

The AWB helped reduce deaths in mas shootings,

But hey,. tell. ne again how assault type weapons don't add to the body count.

The ability to fire 100 rounds or more as fast as you pull the trigger in a accurate rifle has no value in the body count

No...it didn't....and no matter how often you post that it did, it doesn't change the truth.

Gilroy....3 dead, you moron...rifle...

Dayton...9 dead...rifle.....you moron.

Russian polytechnic school....20 dead, 40 injured....tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.

Luby's cafe...2 pistols...24 dead.

Virginia Tech...32 killed, 2 pistols.

Navy Yard shooting...12 dead, pump action shotgun...

It isn't the gun in a mass public shooting, you mope.....it is the time the killer has to murder unarmed people before someone points a gun at him.....

1) So you thionk other wea[omns atre better thsan assault rifles, why do you want them

2) Reducing mass shootings is the goal. No one siaid a ban would eliminate them

3) Parkland/Sandy Hook. Did you forget these? Or are you ass dishonest assfuck?

Gilroy was stopped in 30 seconds. He still killed 3. You are a ******* idiot & should not be permitted to own a gun.

The situation dictates the weapon....you don't get to make that choice for another person.

The rifles you want banned are not Assault rifles, they are civilian and police rifles...the weapons you call "assault" rifles have a selector switch for fully automatic or 3 round burst fire...the weapons you keep talking about don't have that.

A rifle in a self defense situation, depending on the situation is better than a hand gun..... you can add a light, better sites, a laser, and it is a declaration of being a serious gun owner. A woman with a 5 shot snub nose facing one or more criminals might be tested by those criminals. If she presents an AR-15 confidently, they will be much less likely to test her.

The ban wouldn't eliminate any of them...they will simply use hand guns, the most popular gun for mass shootings, shotguns, and they will seek even easier prey.

Parkland....18 dead...... Russian Polytechnic with a tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun 20 dead and 40 injured....... you lose. Virginia Tech, 2 pistols, 32 dead...Luby's cafe, 24 dead, 2 pistols.....

Sandy Hook.....he chose that gun free school and the grade level he attacked because he didn't want resisitance to the attack...in fact, he killed himself as soon as he heard the police sirens......and if he didn't have the AR-15 you moron, he could have killed just as many small children with one or more hand guns or shotguns....you dope.

As far as Gilroy, I am showing you that it isn't the weapon that matters...you dope...it is how much free time in the gun free zone the killer has before someone points a gun at him and makes him stop shooting unarmed people....that is why Gilroy, even with a rifle and magazines...killed 3, while the Russian Polytechnic shooter killed 20 and injured 40 with a tube fed, no magazine, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....

You don't know what you are talking about...

Shove your definition argument up your ass,

If assault riifles ain't worth shit as you keep arguing, why do you care if they are banned???

When you have to go back nearly 30 years for an example, I think you already lost the argument.

In Gilroy 3 dead in 3o seconds. Now pretend that having a semi automatic had nothing to do with it. Three dead but he fired a lot more bullets all in 30 seconds.

If the ficking assaukt rifle is nit an advanmtage, why fp you want rthjemn

You can't keep arguing that they provide no advantage & then clain you need them for self defense.

You argument is ******* stupid.

Moron.....the needs of a mass public shooter are different from someone who is defending their home and family.....you mope..

The mass shooter is in a gun free zone, shooting unarmed, helpless people...

The normal gun owner is all by themselves facing one or more attackers, likely armed with guns, who has to hold out until the police arrive, if they can even get out a call for help....

Can you understand the difference in the two scenarios?

 

[deanrd]

Saying that liberals want late term abortion‘s is exactly the same as saying right wingers want more babies because they want them for target practice.

Oh wait, so why do right wingers want more babies?

 

[RealDave]

**** off. Gun Boy.

I don;t need any more of your dishonest horseshit.

The AWB helped reduce deaths in mas shootings,

But hey,. tell. ne again how assault type weapons don't add to the body count.

The ability to fire 100 rounds or more as fast as you pull the trigger in a accurate rifle has no value in the body count

No...it didn't....and no matter how often you post that it did, it doesn't change the truth.

Gilroy....3 dead, you moron...rifle...

Dayton...9 dead...rifle.....you moron.

Russian polytechnic school....20 dead, 40 injured....tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.

Luby's cafe...2 pistols...24 dead.

Virginia Tech...32 killed, 2 pistols.

Navy Yard shooting...12 dead, pump action shotgun...

It isn't the gun in a mass public shooting, you mope.....it is the time the killer has to murder unarmed people before someone points a gun at him.....

1) So you thionk other wea[omns atre better thsan assault rifles, why do you want them

2) Reducing mass shootings is the goal. No one siaid a ban would eliminate them

3) Parkland/Sandy Hook. Did you forget these? Or are you ass dishonest assfuck?

Gilroy was stopped in 30 seconds. He still killed 3. You are a ******* idiot & should not be permitted to own a gun.

The situation dictates the weapon....you don't get to make that choice for another person.

The rifles you want banned are not Assault rifles, they are civilian and police rifles...the weapons you call "assault" rifles have a selector switch for fully automatic or 3 round burst fire...the weapons you keep talking about don't have that.

A rifle in a self defense situation, depending on the situation is better than a hand gun..... you can add a light, better sites, a laser, and it is a declaration of being a serious gun owner. A woman with a 5 shot snub nose facing one or more criminals might be tested by those criminals. If she presents an AR-15 confidently, they will be much less likely to test her.

The ban wouldn't eliminate any of them...they will simply use hand guns, the most popular gun for mass shootings, shotguns, and they will seek even easier prey.

Parkland....18 dead...... Russian Polytechnic with a tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun 20 dead and 40 injured....... you lose. Virginia Tech, 2 pistols, 32 dead...Luby's cafe, 24 dead, 2 pistols.....

Sandy Hook.....he chose that gun free school and the grade level he attacked because he didn't want resisitance to the attack...in fact, he killed himself as soon as he heard the police sirens......and if he didn't have the AR-15 you moron, he could have killed just as many small children with one or more hand guns or shotguns....you dope.

As far as Gilroy, I am showing you that it isn't the weapon that matters...you dope...it is how much free time in the gun free zone the killer has before someone points a gun at him and makes him stop shooting unarmed people....that is why Gilroy, even with a rifle and magazines...killed 3, while the Russian Polytechnic shooter killed 20 and injured 40 with a tube fed, no magazine, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....

You don't know what you are talking about...

Shove your definition argument up your ass,

If assault riifles ain't worth shit as you keep arguing, why do you care if they are banned???

When you have to go back nearly 30 years for an example, I think you already lost the argument.

In Gilroy 3 dead in 3o seconds. Now pretend that having a semi automatic had nothing to do with it. Three dead but he fired a lot more bullets all in 30 seconds.

If the ficking assaukt rifle is nit an advanmtage, why fp you want rthjemn

You can't keep arguing that they provide no advantage & then clain you need them for self defense.

You argument is ******* stupid.

Moron.....the needs of a mass public shooter are different from someone who is defending their home and family.....you mope..

The mass shooter is in a gun free zone, shooting unarmed, helpless people...

The normal gun owner is all by themselves facing one or more attackers, likely armed with guns, who has to hold out until the police arrive, if they can even get out a call for help....

Can you understand the difference in the two scenarios?

Putting your family in danger trying to protect from a mythical event.

Quit lying about mass shootings & gun free zones. Yet another dishonest argument you continue to make.

 

[RealDave]

**** off. Gun Boy.

I don;t need any more of your dishonest horseshit.

The AWB helped reduce deaths in mas shootings,

But hey,. tell. ne again how assault type weapons don't add to the body count.

The ability to fire 100 rounds or more as fast as you pull the trigger in a accurate rifle has no value in the body count

No...it didn't....and no matter how often you post that it did, it doesn't change the truth.

Gilroy....3 dead, you moron...rifle...

Dayton...9 dead...rifle.....you moron.

Russian polytechnic school....20 dead, 40 injured....tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.

Luby's cafe...2 pistols...24 dead.

Virginia Tech...32 killed, 2 pistols.

Navy Yard shooting...12 dead, pump action shotgun...

It isn't the gun in a mass public shooting, you mope.....it is the time the killer has to murder unarmed people before someone points a gun at him.....

1) So you thionk other wea[omns atre better thsan assault rifles, why do you want them

2) Reducing mass shootings is the goal. No one siaid a ban would eliminate them

3) Parkland/Sandy Hook. Did you forget these? Or are you ass dishonest assfuck?

Gilroy was stopped in 30 seconds. He still killed 3. You are a ******* idiot & should not be permitted to own a gun.

The situation dictates the weapon....you don't get to make that choice for another person.

The rifles you want banned are not Assault rifles, they are civilian and police rifles...the weapons you call "assault" rifles have a selector switch for fully automatic or 3 round burst fire...the weapons you keep talking about don't have that.

A rifle in a self defense situation, depending on the situation is better than a hand gun..... you can add a light, better sites, a laser, and it is a declaration of being a serious gun owner. A woman with a 5 shot snub nose facing one or more criminals might be tested by those criminals. If she presents an AR-15 confidently, they will be much less likely to test her.

The ban wouldn't eliminate any of them...they will simply use hand guns, the most popular gun for mass shootings, shotguns, and they will seek even easier prey.

Parkland....18 dead...... Russian Polytechnic with a tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun 20 dead and 40 injured....... you lose. Virginia Tech, 2 pistols, 32 dead...Luby's cafe, 24 dead, 2 pistols.....

Sandy Hook.....he chose that gun free school and the grade level he attacked because he didn't want resisitance to the attack...in fact, he killed himself as soon as he heard the police sirens......and if he didn't have the AR-15 you moron, he could have killed just as many small children with one or more hand guns or shotguns....you dope.

As far as Gilroy, I am showing you that it isn't the weapon that matters...you dope...it is how much free time in the gun free zone the killer has before someone points a gun at him and makes him stop shooting unarmed people....that is why Gilroy, even with a rifle and magazines...killed 3, while the Russian Polytechnic shooter killed 20 and injured 40 with a tube fed, no magazine, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....

You don't know what you are talking about...

Shove your definition argument up your ass,

If assault riifles ain't worth shit as you keep arguing, why do you care if they are banned???

When you have to go back nearly 30 years for an example, I think you already lost the argument.

In Gilroy 3 dead in 3o seconds. Now pretend that having a semi automatic had nothing to do with it. Three dead but he fired a lot more bullets all in 30 seconds.

If the ficking assaukt rifle is nit an advanmtage, why fp you want rthjemn

You can't keep arguing that they provide no advantage & then clain you need them for self defense.

You argument is ******* stupid.

Because, asshat....... they are just normal, civilian and police rifles. They operate the same way as all the other rifles that aren't lever action, bolt action or pump action...and if you ass clowns are allowed to ban them, you will come back and demand all semi-automatic weapons, including revolvers, pistols, shotguns and all other semi-auto rifles be banned...since they all operate the same way...

It is bait and switch with you lying asshats...

Moron....as you have been told, it isn't the weapon, it is the free time the killer has in a gun free zone shooting unarmed people that determines the death count. As soon as you get someone with a gun pointing it at them or shooting them, the killing stops....

That is why, asshat....

Gilroy.... Rifle with magazine...3 dead.....stopped by a gun.

Russian Polytechnic school shooting.... no rifle, no magazine.... tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.... 20 killed 40 injured...because the Russian police took forever to get there...

Virginia Tech....32 killed, no rifle, 2 pistols......

Luby's cafe...2 pistols....24 killed....

that is why you don't know what you are talking about....

So what other guns were banned after the AWB in 1994?
Please list them or STFU.

 

[2aguy]

No...it didn't....and no matter how often you post that it did, it doesn't change the truth.

Gilroy....3 dead, you moron...rifle...

Dayton...9 dead...rifle.....you moron.

Russian polytechnic school....20 dead, 40 injured....tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.

Luby's cafe...2 pistols...24 dead.

Virginia Tech...32 killed, 2 pistols.

Navy Yard shooting...12 dead, pump action shotgun...

It isn't the gun in a mass public shooting, you mope.....it is the time the killer has to murder unarmed people before someone points a gun at him.....

1) So you thionk other wea[omns atre better thsan assault rifles, why do you want them

2) Reducing mass shootings is the goal. No one siaid a ban would eliminate them

3) Parkland/Sandy Hook. Did you forget these? Or are you ass dishonest assfuck?

Gilroy was stopped in 30 seconds. He still killed 3. You are a ******* idiot & should not be permitted to own a gun.

The situation dictates the weapon....you don't get to make that choice for another person.

The rifles you want banned are not Assault rifles, they are civilian and police rifles...the weapons you call "assault" rifles have a selector switch for fully automatic or 3 round burst fire...the weapons you keep talking about don't have that.

A rifle in a self defense situation, depending on the situation is better than a hand gun..... you can add a light, better sites, a laser, and it is a declaration of being a serious gun owner. A woman with a 5 shot snub nose facing one or more criminals might be tested by those criminals. If she presents an AR-15 confidently, they will be much less likely to test her.

The ban wouldn't eliminate any of them...they will simply use hand guns, the most popular gun for mass shootings, shotguns, and they will seek even easier prey.

Parkland....18 dead...... Russian Polytechnic with a tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun 20 dead and 40 injured....... you lose. Virginia Tech, 2 pistols, 32 dead...Luby's cafe, 24 dead, 2 pistols.....

Sandy Hook.....he chose that gun free school and the grade level he attacked because he didn't want resisitance to the attack...in fact, he killed himself as soon as he heard the police sirens......and if he didn't have the AR-15 you moron, he could have killed just as many small children with one or more hand guns or shotguns....you dope.

As far as Gilroy, I am showing you that it isn't the weapon that matters...you dope...it is how much free time in the gun free zone the killer has before someone points a gun at him and makes him stop shooting unarmed people....that is why Gilroy, even with a rifle and magazines...killed 3, while the Russian Polytechnic shooter killed 20 and injured 40 with a tube fed, no magazine, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....

You don't know what you are talking about...

Shove your definition argument up your ass,

If assault riifles ain't worth shit as you keep arguing, why do you care if they are banned???

When you have to go back nearly 30 years for an example, I think you already lost the argument.

In Gilroy 3 dead in 3o seconds. Now pretend that having a semi automatic had nothing to do with it. Three dead but he fired a lot more bullets all in 30 seconds.

If the ficking assaukt rifle is nit an advanmtage, why fp you want rthjemn

You can't keep arguing that they provide no advantage & then clain you need them for self defense.

You argument is ******* stupid.

Moron.....the needs of a mass public shooter are different from someone who is defending their home and family.....you mope..

The mass shooter is in a gun free zone, shooting unarmed, helpless people...

The normal gun owner is all by themselves facing one or more attackers, likely armed with guns, who has to hold out until the police arrive, if they can even get out a call for help....

Can you understand the difference in the two scenarios?

Putting your family in danger trying to protect from a mythical event.

Quit lying about mass shootings & gun free zones. Yet another dishonest argument you continue to make.

It isn't a lie, it is the truth......you can't handle the truth, and you aren't Tom Cruise...so you have nothing to show for your ignorance...

 

[RealDave]

So do you actually think that it makes your posts valid the more you post it or are you so stupid that you forgot yopu pasted it already.

Please - tell us again why you believe correlation proves causation.
I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

Correlation provides a guideline.

Limit access to assault rifles, body count goes down
Remove these limits & they skyrocket.

Lets hear why there is no causal relationship. What other factor made this happen?

Moron....they limited access and the body count didn't go down...

The preferred weapon for mass shootings is the hand gun because you can conceal it....and you can carry several if you want.

You don't know what you are talking about...actual research that you were given links to, say you are an idiot and don't know what you are talking about.

The body count did go down. Posted them. Quit lying.

As for concealing, there the long coat., rain coat, etc.

 

[M14 Shooter]

[
Putting your family in danger trying to protect from a mythical event.
Quit lying about mass shootings & gun free zones. Yet another dishonest argument you continue to make.

What's that?
YOU cannot prove your claim that the AWB reduced the number of deaths?
No surprise.
I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The body count did go down. Posted them. Quit lying.
As for concealing, there the long coat., rain coat, etc.

What's that?
YOU cannot prove your claim that the AWB reduced the number of deaths?
No surprise.
I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

 

[2aguy]

No...it didn't....and no matter how often you post that it did, it doesn't change the truth.

Gilroy....3 dead, you moron...rifle...

Dayton...9 dead...rifle.....you moron.

Russian polytechnic school....20 dead, 40 injured....tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.

Luby's cafe...2 pistols...24 dead.

Virginia Tech...32 killed, 2 pistols.

Navy Yard shooting...12 dead, pump action shotgun...

It isn't the gun in a mass public shooting, you mope.....it is the time the killer has to murder unarmed people before someone points a gun at him.....

1) So you thionk other wea[omns atre better thsan assault rifles, why do you want them

2) Reducing mass shootings is the goal. No one siaid a ban would eliminate them

3) Parkland/Sandy Hook. Did you forget these? Or are you ass dishonest assfuck?

Gilroy was stopped in 30 seconds. He still killed 3. You are a ******* idiot & should not be permitted to own a gun.

The situation dictates the weapon....you don't get to make that choice for another person.

The rifles you want banned are not Assault rifles, they are civilian and police rifles...the weapons you call "assault" rifles have a selector switch for fully automatic or 3 round burst fire...the weapons you keep talking about don't have that.

A rifle in a self defense situation, depending on the situation is better than a hand gun..... you can add a light, better sites, a laser, and it is a declaration of being a serious gun owner. A woman with a 5 shot snub nose facing one or more criminals might be tested by those criminals. If she presents an AR-15 confidently, they will be much less likely to test her.

The ban wouldn't eliminate any of them...they will simply use hand guns, the most popular gun for mass shootings, shotguns, and they will seek even easier prey.

Parkland....18 dead...... Russian Polytechnic with a tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun 20 dead and 40 injured....... you lose. Virginia Tech, 2 pistols, 32 dead...Luby's cafe, 24 dead, 2 pistols.....

Sandy Hook.....he chose that gun free school and the grade level he attacked because he didn't want resisitance to the attack...in fact, he killed himself as soon as he heard the police sirens......and if he didn't have the AR-15 you moron, he could have killed just as many small children with one or more hand guns or shotguns....you dope.

As far as Gilroy, I am showing you that it isn't the weapon that matters...you dope...it is how much free time in the gun free zone the killer has before someone points a gun at him and makes him stop shooting unarmed people....that is why Gilroy, even with a rifle and magazines...killed 3, while the Russian Polytechnic shooter killed 20 and injured 40 with a tube fed, no magazine, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....

You don't know what you are talking about...

Shove your definition argument up your ass,

If assault riifles ain't worth shit as you keep arguing, why do you care if they are banned???

When you have to go back nearly 30 years for an example, I think you already lost the argument.

In Gilroy 3 dead in 3o seconds. Now pretend that having a semi automatic had nothing to do with it. Three dead but he fired a lot more bullets all in 30 seconds.

If the ficking assaukt rifle is nit an advanmtage, why fp you want rthjemn

You can't keep arguing that they provide no advantage & then clain you need them for self defense.

You argument is ******* stupid.

Because, asshat....... they are just normal, civilian and police rifles. They operate the same way as all the other rifles that aren't lever action, bolt action or pump action...and if you ass clowns are allowed to ban them, you will come back and demand all semi-automatic weapons, including revolvers, pistols, shotguns and all other semi-auto rifles be banned...since they all operate the same way...

It is bait and switch with you lying asshats...

Moron....as you have been told, it isn't the weapon, it is the free time the killer has in a gun free zone shooting unarmed people that determines the death count. As soon as you get someone with a gun pointing it at them or shooting them, the killing stops....

That is why, asshat....

Gilroy.... Rifle with magazine...3 dead.....stopped by a gun.

Russian Polytechnic school shooting.... no rifle, no magazine.... tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.... 20 killed 40 injured...because the Russian police took forever to get there...

Virginia Tech....32 killed, no rifle, 2 pistols......

Luby's cafe...2 pistols....24 killed....

that is why you don't know what you are talking about....

So what other guns were banned after the AWB in 1994?
Please list them or STFU.

Moron....you and the other asshats are already calling for banning all semi-automatic weapons and any weapon that takes a magazine....that means all rifles, pistols and shotguns, as well as revolvers.....leaving bolt action rifles...until you want them banned as sniper rifles.....lever action rifles...until you want them banned as weapons of war and Indian genocide.....and pump action shotguns......an actual military weapon used to kill 13 people at the navy yard and 20 at the shooting in Russia....

 

[RealDave]

1) So you thionk other wea[omns atre better thsan assault rifles, why do you want them

2) Reducing mass shootings is the goal. No one siaid a ban would eliminate them

3) Parkland/Sandy Hook. Did you forget these? Or are you ass dishonest assfuck?

Gilroy was stopped in 30 seconds. He still killed 3. You are a ******* idiot & should not be permitted to own a gun.

The situation dictates the weapon....you don't get to make that choice for another person.

The rifles you want banned are not Assault rifles, they are civilian and police rifles...the weapons you call "assault" rifles have a selector switch for fully automatic or 3 round burst fire...the weapons you keep talking about don't have that.

A rifle in a self defense situation, depending on the situation is better than a hand gun..... you can add a light, better sites, a laser, and it is a declaration of being a serious gun owner. A woman with a 5 shot snub nose facing one or more criminals might be tested by those criminals. If she presents an AR-15 confidently, they will be much less likely to test her.

The ban wouldn't eliminate any of them...they will simply use hand guns, the most popular gun for mass shootings, shotguns, and they will seek even easier prey.

Parkland....18 dead...... Russian Polytechnic with a tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun 20 dead and 40 injured....... you lose. Virginia Tech, 2 pistols, 32 dead...Luby's cafe, 24 dead, 2 pistols.....

Sandy Hook.....he chose that gun free school and the grade level he attacked because he didn't want resisitance to the attack...in fact, he killed himself as soon as he heard the police sirens......and if he didn't have the AR-15 you moron, he could have killed just as many small children with one or more hand guns or shotguns....you dope.

As far as Gilroy, I am showing you that it isn't the weapon that matters...you dope...it is how much free time in the gun free zone the killer has before someone points a gun at him and makes him stop shooting unarmed people....that is why Gilroy, even with a rifle and magazines...killed 3, while the Russian Polytechnic shooter killed 20 and injured 40 with a tube fed, no magazine, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....

You don't know what you are talking about...

Shove your definition argument up your ass,

If assault riifles ain't worth shit as you keep arguing, why do you care if they are banned???

When you have to go back nearly 30 years for an example, I think you already lost the argument.

In Gilroy 3 dead in 3o seconds. Now pretend that having a semi automatic had nothing to do with it. Three dead but he fired a lot more bullets all in 30 seconds.

If the ficking assaukt rifle is nit an advanmtage, why fp you want rthjemn

You can't keep arguing that they provide no advantage & then clain you need them for self defense.

You argument is ******* stupid.

Moron.....the needs of a mass public shooter are different from someone who is defending their home and family.....you mope..

The mass shooter is in a gun free zone, shooting unarmed, helpless people...

The normal gun owner is all by themselves facing one or more attackers, likely armed with guns, who has to hold out until the police arrive, if they can even get out a call for help....

Can you understand the difference in the two scenarios?

Putting your family in danger trying to protect from a mythical event.

Quit lying about mass shootings & gun free zones. Yet another dishonest argument you continue to make.

It isn't a lie, it is the truth......you can't handle the truth, and you aren't Tom Cruise...so you have nothing to show for your ignorance...

The Sandy Hook shooter picked the school because HE WENT TO SCHOOL THERE you ******* idiot. Not because it was a gun free zone. Co,umbine - same thing.

If you were honest & had a brain, you would see many of these mass shooters had history at those sites,.

But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, you are dishonest & have nothing but sishonest arguments.

 

[M14 Shooter]

If you were honest & had a brain, you would see many of these mass shooters had history at those sites,.

If you were honest and had a brain, you would admit you cannot prove your claim that the AWB reduced the number of deaths.

But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, you are dishonest & have nothing but sishonest arguments.

I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

 

[RealDave]

1) So you thionk other wea[omns atre better thsan assault rifles, why do you want them

2) Reducing mass shootings is the goal. No one siaid a ban would eliminate them

3) Parkland/Sandy Hook. Did you forget these? Or are you ass dishonest assfuck?

Gilroy was stopped in 30 seconds. He still killed 3. You are a ******* idiot & should not be permitted to own a gun.

The situation dictates the weapon....you don't get to make that choice for another person.

The rifles you want banned are not Assault rifles, they are civilian and police rifles...the weapons you call "assault" rifles have a selector switch for fully automatic or 3 round burst fire...the weapons you keep talking about don't have that.

A rifle in a self defense situation, depending on the situation is better than a hand gun..... you can add a light, better sites, a laser, and it is a declaration of being a serious gun owner. A woman with a 5 shot snub nose facing one or more criminals might be tested by those criminals. If she presents an AR-15 confidently, they will be much less likely to test her.

The ban wouldn't eliminate any of them...they will simply use hand guns, the most popular gun for mass shootings, shotguns, and they will seek even easier prey.

Parkland....18 dead...... Russian Polytechnic with a tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun 20 dead and 40 injured....... you lose. Virginia Tech, 2 pistols, 32 dead...Luby's cafe, 24 dead, 2 pistols.....

Sandy Hook.....he chose that gun free school and the grade level he attacked because he didn't want resisitance to the attack...in fact, he killed himself as soon as he heard the police sirens......and if he didn't have the AR-15 you moron, he could have killed just as many small children with one or more hand guns or shotguns....you dope.

As far as Gilroy, I am showing you that it isn't the weapon that matters...you dope...it is how much free time in the gun free zone the killer has before someone points a gun at him and makes him stop shooting unarmed people....that is why Gilroy, even with a rifle and magazines...killed 3, while the Russian Polytechnic shooter killed 20 and injured 40 with a tube fed, no magazine, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....

You don't know what you are talking about...

Shove your definition argument up your ass,

If assault riifles ain't worth shit as you keep arguing, why do you care if they are banned???

When you have to go back nearly 30 years for an example, I think you already lost the argument.

In Gilroy 3 dead in 3o seconds. Now pretend that having a semi automatic had nothing to do with it. Three dead but he fired a lot more bullets all in 30 seconds.

If the ficking assaukt rifle is nit an advanmtage, why fp you want rthjemn

You can't keep arguing that they provide no advantage & then clain you need them for self defense.

You argument is ******* stupid.

Because, asshat....... they are just normal, civilian and police rifles. They operate the same way as all the other rifles that aren't lever action, bolt action or pump action...and if you ass clowns are allowed to ban them, you will come back and demand all semi-automatic weapons, including revolvers, pistols, shotguns and all other semi-auto rifles be banned...since they all operate the same way...

It is bait and switch with you lying asshats...

Moron....as you have been told, it isn't the weapon, it is the free time the killer has in a gun free zone shooting unarmed people that determines the death count. As soon as you get someone with a gun pointing it at them or shooting them, the killing stops....

That is why, asshat....

Gilroy.... Rifle with magazine...3 dead.....stopped by a gun.

Russian Polytechnic school shooting.... no rifle, no magazine.... tube fed, 5 shot, pump action shotgun.... 20 killed 40 injured...because the Russian police took forever to get there...

Virginia Tech....32 killed, no rifle, 2 pistols......

Luby's cafe...2 pistols....24 killed....

that is why you don't know what you are talking about....

So what other guns were banned after the AWB in 1994?
Please list them or STFU.

Moron....you and the other asshats are already calling for banning all semi-automatic weapons and any weapon that takes a magazine....that means all rifles, pistols and shotguns, as well as revolvers.....leaving bolt action rifles...until you want them banned as sniper rifles.....lever action rifles...until you want them banned as weapons of war and Indian genocide.....and pump action shotguns......an actual military weapon used to kill 13 people at the navy yard and 20 at the shooting in Russia....

You are lying again. Most people are not calling for that extensive as a ban.

You are being ridiculous & somewhat stupid in your arguments. Why do you want children to be slaughtered? We have to give these people access, we can't extend background checks, We can stop therm from a 150 round magazines.

Your suggestion is that we do nothing except periodically bury our children.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You are being ridiculous & somewhat stupid in your arguments

If you weren't being ridiculous and stupid in your arguments, you would admit you cannot prove your claim that the AWB reduced the number of deaths.

But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, you are ridiculous & have nothing but stupid arguments.

I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

 

[RealDave]

If you were honest & had a brain, you would see many of these mass shooters had history at those sites,.

If you were honest and had a brain, you would admit you cannot prove your claim that the AWB reduced the number of deaths.

But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, you are dishonest & have nothing but sishonest arguments.

I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

I said mass shooting deaths were reduced under the AWB,

You called me a liar.

I proved it.

Now you lie about what I said & keep repeatrng it .

Quit humping my leg.


Explain how the deaths lowered under the ban & skyrocketed after it expired. What are the reasons for that? I keep asking, and chickenshit you keep running away.

 

[M14 Shooter]

If you were honest & had a brain, you would see many of these mass shooters had history at those sites,.

If you were honest and had a brain, you would admit you cannot prove your claim that the AWB reduced the number of deaths.

But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, you are dishonest & have nothing but sishonest arguments.

I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail.

I said mass shooting deaths were reduced under the AWB,

NooooOOOOO...
You claimed the AWB REDUCED these deaths - that the number of deaths fell BECAUSE the AWB was in place - that the AWB CAUSED the reduction in the number of deaths.

If you were honest and had a brain, you would admit you cannot prove your claim that the AWB reduced the number of deaths.
But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, you are dishonest & have nothing but sishonest arguments.

I SO enjoy the simple mind of the anti-gun loon, illustrated in detail