Why should ANYONE support Kamala given her track record?

[BackAgain]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

 

[crossbody]

They were against Trump for paying a mistress/side slut

Kamala Harris is "THE" mistress/side slut

Now democrats have to shut their hypocrite mouths, and throw their vote away on that.

 

[Concerned American]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

Kamala Harris has been stuck in the blocks since the first time she held elected office. She has NEVER DONE ANYTHING beneficial to ANYONE. She also has NEVER WON A SO MUCH AS A PRIMARY IN ANY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

 

[MarathonMike]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

Cackles will get 10s of millions of votes from people who do what they are told without thinking of the consequences.

 

[surada]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

You're a riot. Compared to Trump's track record?

Remember how Trump spent $90,000 to trash Reagan in 1987?

 

[surada]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

It's PROSECUTOR, not persecutor. Are you a convicted felon?

 

[Crepitus]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

Lol, you guys got nuthin'.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

Remember when Progressives questioned Dan Quayles “Gravitas”?

Kamala just showed up at Quayles house looking to borrow a cup of gravitas

 

[Crepitus]

Cackles will get 10s of millions of votes from people who do what they are told without thinking of the consequences.

When did you change tRump's name to "cackles"?

 

[Concerned American]

Remember when Progressives questioned Dan Quayles “Gravitas”?

Kamala just showed up at Quayles house looking to borrow a cup of gravitas

Did she bring a potatoe with her?

 

[rampart]

They were against Trump for paying a mistress/side slut

Kamala Harris is "THE" mistress/side slut

Now democrats have to shut their hypocrite mouths, and throw their vote away on that.

i don't care about his side slut. he is an azzwhole.

 

[wamose]

As if it wasn't bad enough that Democrats ran a make believe candidate, Biden, to divert attention away from their eventual defective candidate, Kamala. Now they're throwing Biden under the bus again by making him propose all these idiotic revisions to the Supreme Court. In the end, they'll just blame that lunacy on a feeble, disoriented old man, even though EVERY Democrat is actually for packing the SC. MAGA

 

[krichton]

Correct, Kamala really has done nothing to warrant a vote for her. But Trump had 4 years as the actual president, what did he accomplish, other than take rights away from women and inciting a riot at the capitol building? Why does Trump warrant a vote? So he can use his office to exact revenge? So he can make project 2025 a reality? So he can further divide the country? Why would a voter want to throw away their vote in order to strip away our democracy.....unless that's what they want to begin with?

 

[BackAgain]

You're a riot. Compared to Trump's track record?

Remember how Trump spent $90,000 to trash Reagan in 1987?

I notice that you, stupida, cannot defend anything done in any portion of Kamalalala’s various careers.

 

[BackAgain]

It's PROSECUTOR, not persecutor. Are you a convicted felon?

Damn ; you’re retarded.

She was a public persecutor.

Are you a convicted idiot?

 

[BackAgain]

Lol, you guys got nuthin'.

Lol

wrong again, Crappytush.

We guys have the obvious truth on our side about Kamalalala.

She was a ******* awful public persecutor. She did nothing in her stint as a Senator. She managed to do less than nothing as V.P.

And you guys support that miserable failure. lol.

 

[BackAgain]

When did you change tRump's name to "cackles"?

Your ignorance and dishonesty is showing, Crappytush, as is your desperation.

 

[martybegan]

Lol

wrong again, Crappytush.

We guys have the obvious truth on our side about Kamalalala.

She was a ******* awful public persecutor. She did nothing in her stint as a Senator. She managed to do less than nothing as V.P.

And you guys support that miserable failure. lol.

And as a Presidential Candidate she is flippy flopping on all her hard left positions, one at a time.

 

[Independent thinker]

Consider just Kamala’s history as a public persecutor:

Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor comes under scrutiny

Her history with the Kevin Cooper case and marijuana sentencing is being brought to light.

www.newsweek.com

Read the piece.

If (as a prosecutor) you are aware that the cops either did plant evidence or that your case is otherwise tainted, why not accept an appellate challenge which might allow you to seek actual justice. It is a prosecutor’s absolute legal and ethical duty to seek justice — not just convictions.

What did she do that was so wonderful as the CA attorney general after that?

What did she accomplish as a U.S. senator other than to join the slime circus against Kavanaugh?

And let’s be fair, objective or honest: did she actually do a damn thing as V.P.? (Most don’t. That’s a given. But she did get the border czar slot and didn’t do a damn thing about the flood of illegal immigrants coming into the United States.)

She makes speeches a laborious thing to have to wade through. Granted, she is marginally better at it than President Potato. But that’s an amazingly low bar.

Her actual record simply doesn’t justify a single vote for her.

Well, if orange man bad........................................................................

 

[Ringo]

Trump has little chance against Kamala. She's too uncomfortable a candidate for him - black, female, actively supports homosexuals, looks queer, not pretty. She can't be accused of pedophilia, racial hatred, dislike of LGBT and leftists. Her incoherency is a plus - because the Democrat electorate is degenerate, there's a layer of protesters, antifa, BLM - all mostly stoners on drugs and medication. That audience understands her very much. The very image of the first woman, and a black woman at that, gives her the kind of credentials that Trump and his “Make America Great Again” can't muster. Even a shot in the ear won't help much.
"A vote" by mail will decide everything

https://idiod.video/1uh0bx.mp4