Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act

Nobody needs a committee and "peer review" (aka pal review) to clearly demonstrate the Bernoulli effect or that humid warm air rising into cooler dry air forms clouds and rain...Those phenomenon can be bench tested, measured, repeated on demand, quantified, and falsified.

None of your globalclimatecoolerwarmeringchange hoax can pass any of those centuries-old, tried and true, hurdles and acid tests for science EVER....."Consensus" comes from committees of political hacks.

You don't have science, you have a popcorn fart with pretty charts and graphs that prove nothing.
You’re trying to sound smart about science, and failing.
Are you struggling with the word “consensus” ?
Bernoulli effect ? Hilarious….go fly a kite.
 
So how many trillions is that mess gonna cost us?

Blah, I figure I got less than 20 years left on this rock so I'd rather not have my standard of living reduced by a bunch of climate change weenie grift.
We’ve already had our standard of living changed for the worse from polution of burning fossil fuels supported by the science illiterate denier crowd..
 
We’ve already had our standard of living changed for the worse from polution of burning fossil fuels supported by the science illiterate denier crowd..
You are so full of shit!

The water/air has never been cleaner/better in my AO in my lifetime.....Us boomers did that 'cause the "greatest generation" was fuckin' well trying to kill us!

The last couple shit-stain generations have no idea of the pollution of the 60s/70s my generation had to put up with.

The reason our standard of living has decreased due to inflation is because of your ilk's grift is costing us trillions we don't have. You should be ashamed, but you fucks have no shame.

Assholes.
 
You are so full of shit!

The water/air has never been cleaner/better in my AO in my lifetime.....Us boomers did that 'cause the "greatest generation" was fuckin' well trying to kill us!

The last couple shit-stain generations have no idea of the pollution of the 60s/70s my generation had to put up with.

The reason our standard of living has decreased due to inflation is because of your ilk's grift is costing us trillions we don't have. You should be ashamed, but you fucks have no shame.

Assholes.
What does AO stand for?
 
You are so full of shit!

The water/air has never been cleaner/better in my AO in my lifetime.....Us boomers did that 'cause the "greatest generation" was fuckin' well trying to kill us!

The last couple shit-stain generations have no idea of the pollution of the 60s/70s my generation had to put up with.

The reason our standard of living has decreased due to inflation is because of your ilk's grift is costing us trillions we don't have. You should be ashamed, but you fucks have no shame.

Assholes.
Hilarious…..Explain what the gop has done from the 80s till now about pollution
 
Years ago, I assembled this list of Cultists who propose an 80% reduction in human caused carbon dioxide. Of course it is insane but that never stops the Left. Today they assert, with straight faces, that man can become women and need tampons.

President Barack Obama


http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy_campaign


United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/green/articles/2008/11/09/un_seeks_broad_obama_role_on_climate/


European Union

Europe's Roadmap to a Renewable Energy Future - Our World


Union of Concerned Scientists

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/solutions/big_picture_solutions/a-target-for-us-emissions.html


British Government's Committee on Climate Change

http://www.treehugger.com/files/200...itte-british-cut-ghg-emissions-80-percent.php


Prime Minister Hatoyama of Japan

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/us-japan-joint-message-climate-change-negotiations


Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL194440620070419


Ecological Conservation Organization

http://www.ecoconservation.org/25901/34609.html


National Geographic Society

National Geographic – National Geographic

Center for American Progress, headed by John Podesta, Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/01/romm_emissions.html

__________________________________________
 
Years ago, I assembled this list of Cultists who propose an 80% reduction in human caused carbon dioxide. Of course it is insane but that never stops the Left. Today they assert, with straight faces, that man can become women and need tampons.

President Barack Obama


http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy_campaign


United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/green/articles/2008/11/09/un_seeks_broad_obama_role_on_climate/


European Union

Europe's Roadmap to a Renewable Energy Future - Our World


Union of Concerned Scientists

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/solutions/big_picture_solutions/a-target-for-us-emissions.html


British Government's Committee on Climate Change

http://www.treehugger.com/files/200...itte-british-cut-ghg-emissions-80-percent.php


Prime Minister Hatoyama of Japan

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/us-japan-joint-message-climate-change-negotiations


Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL194440620070419


Ecological Conservation Organization

http://www.ecoconservation.org/25901/34609.html


National Geographic Society

National Geographic – National Geographic

Center for American Progress, headed by John Podesta, Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff

Issues

__________________________________________
What’s the relationship between AGW and men claiming to be women ? You must be gay.
 
GOOGLE AI
The greenhouse effect is a natural process that warms the Earth's surface by trapping the Sun's heat in the atmosphere. Without the greenhouse effect, the Earth's average surface temperature would be about -18°C (-0.4°F), but the greenhouse effect raises it to about 15°C (59°F) on average. This process allows life on Earth to exist.
Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and some artificial chemicals, absorb and re-radiate some of the Sun's energy that reaches the Earth's atmosphere. This energy warms the atmosphere and the surface of the Earth. The amount of heat radiated from the atmosphere to the surface is sometimes called “back radiation” and is equivalent to 100% of the incoming solar energy.
However, human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, have disrupted the Earth's energy balance by releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. According to the IPCC's 2007 report, Earth's average surface temperatures have risen about 0.74°C (1.33°F) during the past 100 years, and most of that increase is likely due to human activities.







And what might you believe my agenda to be?
again,

 
Do you generally have trouble handling hypotheticals? The point is that the argument that CO2 can't have a significant effect because it is such a small portion of the atmosphere fails on objective, quantitative analysis.
well there are statistics that say what those are. You're insinuating something that isn't factually true with the amount in the atmosphere now.
 
GOOGLE AI
The greenhouse effect is a natural process that warms the Earth's surface by trapping the Sun's heat in the atmosphere. Without the greenhouse effect, the Earth's average surface temperature would be about -18°C (-0.4°F), but the greenhouse effect raises it to about 15°C (59°F) on average. This process allows life on Earth to exist.
Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and some artificial chemicals, absorb and re-radiate some of the Sun's energy that reaches the Earth's atmosphere. This energy warms the atmosphere and the surface of the Earth. The amount of heat radiated from the atmosphere to the surface is sometimes called “back radiation” and is equivalent to 100% of the incoming solar energy.
However, human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, have disrupted the Earth's energy balance by releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. According to the IPCC's 2007 report, Earth's average surface temperatures have risen about 0.74°C (1.33°F) during the past 100 years, and most of that increase is likely due to human activities.







And what might you believe my agenda to be?
Your agenda is to disrupt and dissolve Western society and Capitalism to advance international socialism/communism. You want to be one of the few that dictates to the rest of us how to live, while you get to receive more benefits than the majority do.

If not that than it is to advance the gross ignorance and lies/disinformation you constantly present here.

Classic example is the exclusions from this link you provided;
...
Just as the major atmospheric gases (oxygen and nitrogen) are transparent to incoming sunlight, they are also transparent to outgoing thermal infrared. However, water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and other trace gases are opaque to many wavelengths of thermal infrared energy. Remember that the surface radiates the net equivalent of 17 percent of incoming solar energy as thermal infrared. However, the amount that directly escapes to space is only about 12 percent of incoming solar energy. The remaining fraction—a net 5-6 percent of incoming solar energy—is transferred to the atmosphere when greenhouse gas molecules absorb thermal infrared energy radiated by the surface.
....
Some of the heat escapes directly to space, and the rest is transferred to higher and higher levels of the atmosphere, until the energy leaving the top of the atmosphere matches the amount of incoming solar energy. Because the maximum possible amount of incoming sunlight is fixed by the solar constant (which depends only on Earth’s distance from the Sun and very small variations during the solar cycle), the natural greenhouse effect does not cause a runaway increase in surface temperature on Earth.
....

Carbon dioxide, methane, etc. don't even combine into 1/2 of 1% of the atmosphere.
Water vapor on the other hand is usually about an additional 10%.

Water vapor is the primary role of greenhouse gas, the others are VERY minor contributors, and are not the determinants.

You are either intentionally and deliberately lying and mis-informing; or grossly ignorant and stupid.
Which is it, Sithspan?
 
Your agenda is to disrupt and dissolve Western society and Capitalism to advance international socialism/communism.
No, it is not.
You want to be one of the few that dictates to the rest of us how to live, while you get to receive more benefits than the majority do.
No, I do not.
If not that than it is to advance the gross ignorance and lies/disinformation you constantly present here.
You should look up Dunning-Kreuger.
Classic example is the exclusions from this link you provided;
...
Just as the major atmospheric gases (oxygen and nitrogen) are transparent to incoming sunlight, they are also transparent to outgoing thermal infrared. However, water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and other trace gases are opaque to many wavelengths of thermal infrared energy. Remember that the surface radiates the net equivalent of 17 percent of incoming solar energy as thermal infrared. However, the amount that directly escapes to space is only about 12 percent of incoming solar energy. The remaining fraction—a net 5-6 percent of incoming solar energy—is transferred to the atmosphere when greenhouse gas molecules absorb thermal infrared energy radiated by the surface.
....
Some of the heat escapes directly to space, and the rest is transferred to higher and higher levels of the atmosphere, until the energy leaving the top of the atmosphere matches the amount of incoming solar energy. Because the maximum possible amount of incoming sunlight is fixed by the solar constant (which depends only on Earth’s distance from the Sun and very small variations during the solar cycle), the natural greenhouse effect does not cause a runaway increase in surface temperature on Earth.
....

Carbon dioxide, methane, etc. don't even combine into 1/2 of 1% of the atmosphere.
Water vapor on the other hand is usually about an additional 10%.

Water vapor is the primary role of greenhouse gas, the others are VERY minor contributors, and are not the determinants.

You are either intentionally and deliberately lying and mis-informing; or grossly ignorant and stupid.
Which is it, Sithspan?
I have no idea what you mean by "exclusions from this link".

Back before the industrial revolution, water vapor was responsible for half of Earth's greenhouse warming and CO2 for 1/3rd. Now, with increased levels of, CO2 is responsible for 2/3rds to 3/4ths of greenhouse warming. As for water vapor, since it routinely rains, humans cannot directly add water to the atmosphere. It we try, it will simply rain out. The only way to increase the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere is to increase the atmosphere's temperature. And, lo and behold, that is what we are doing with our added CO2. So water vapor acts as a rather potent positive feedback to CO2 warming. It is not a cause, it is a result.
 
then why did you bring in men acting as women? weird.

Post # 168
That’s a lie. I asked YOU why you had to bring it up in this thread. Another bold faced lie.
 

Carbon dioxide, methane, etc. don't even combine into 1/2 of 1% of the atmosphere.
Water vapor on the other hand is usually about an additional 10%.

Water vapor is the primary role of greenhouse gas, the others are VERY minor contributors, and are not the determinants.

You are either intentionally and deliberately lying and mis-informing; or grossly ignorant and stupid.
Which is it, Sithspan (Crick)?
There might be a third option, which is that he believes everything he says as do many so-called educated experts. They get hundreds of millions in government grants and tax free contributions from saps, which money they dearly want to keep raking in.

Psychological experiments have repeatedly demonstrated a powerful desire by humans to be "part of the crowd" so they are not ostracized or laughed at.
Calling such people a "denier" is enough to trigger them into believing anything and regurgitating it forever. Same effect with calling them a "bigot" if they do not genuflect to homosexuals and transgenders, as they ruin countless lives of innocent, impressionable children. That is why the Boy Scouts of America went bankrupt after the courts ordered them to accept queers - the "Q" in LGBTQ. After more than 80,000 Boy Scouts were molested by queer scoutmasters, they won judgments totaling more than $2.4 billion, bankrupting the BSA. But hey, at least there's no "bigotry" - just tens of thousands of lives shattered. The world is being financially shattered and divided by the "denier" name-callers. It doesn't take much to set them off.

___________________________________________
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom