Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act

[ding]

Proof Ding is a paid member of the Co2 FRAUD

I fart in your general direction

 

[Crick]

Dear Chem Engineer,

Don't you feel some sense of obligation to validate your views? If you do not, there's just no telling what people are going to think of you.

Still waiting for a response of some sort from Chem Engineer

Do you accept the greenhouse effect?

If so, do you accept that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

Do you accept that humans burning fossil fuels are responsible for the increase in atmospheric CO2 from 280 ppm to 420 ppm?

 

[EMH]

Dear Chem Engineer,

Don't you feel some sense of obligation to validate your views? If you do not, there's just no telling what people are going to think of you.

Dear crock,

do you accept the truth that highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere for decades despite rising Co2?

 

[Crick]

Dear crock,

do you accept the truth that highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere for decades despite rising Co2?

Have you gotten help yet?

 

[EMH]

Have you gotten help yet?

Here is the documentation of the FACT that the SATELLITES AND BALLOONS showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

 

[Crick]

Here is the documentation of the FACT that the SATELLITES AND BALLOONS showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

I guess not. Don't put it off. I know it's the weekend, but right after a good breakfast on Monday morning, call a mental health facility and tell them you need some help. You'll thank me for it.

 

[EMH]

I guess not. Don't put it off. I know it's the weekend, but right after a good breakfast on Monday morning, call a mental health facility and tell them you need some help. You'll thank me for it.

This is what we are funding as taxpayers... a complete and total science invalid liar who cannot respond to basic climate questions...

who claims to live in FLA and had never heard of the term CANES before...

 

[Crick]

This is what we are funding as taxpayers... a complete and total science invalid liar who cannot respond to basic climate questions...

who claims to live in FLA and had never heard of the term CANES before...

Psychiatric HELP. That is what you need. EVERYONE here knows it. You need to get back in touch with reality - you're certainly not getting there by yourself.

 

[ding]

Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act​

Because there's no reason for their jobs to exist if there is no catastrophe.

 

[Crick]

Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act​

Because there's no reason for their jobs to exist if there is no catastrophe.

Given they discovered AGW, their jobs existed before the theory.

 

[ding]

Given they discovered AGW, their jobs existed before the theory.

Their jobs exist because of it. No crisis. No jobs.

 

[Wuwei]

Here is the documentation of the FACT that the SATELLITES AND BALLOONS showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

Thermal EM radiation is the only way the earth can cool. As the top of the troposphere cools, the earth radiates less heat. That means the lower atmosphere retains more heat, and the earth globally warms where we are and not where the balloons fly.

 

[EMH]

Given they discovered AGW, their jobs existed before the theory.

There is no real data supporting AGW, just fudge, starting with the satellite and balloon data, which showed NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE for decades of rising Co2...

 

[Dagosa]

Sad you show up drunk.

Dwarf.

 

[Dagosa]

Thermal EM radiation is the only way the earth can cool. As the top of the troposphere cools, the earth radiates less heat. That means the lower atmosphere retains more heat, and the earth globally warms where we are and not where the balloons fly.

Yup
Deniers are totally confused when they buy into “ Tuckerisms from science illiterate sources.

 

[ding]

Thermal EM radiation is the only way the earth can cool. As the top of the troposphere cools, the earth radiates less heat. That means the lower atmosphere retains more heat, and the earth globally warms where we are and not where the balloons fly.

That's a dumb statement.



These results provide direct evidence for the ocean’s persistent, central role in abrupt glacial climate change

The idea of Gulf Stream slowdowns as a mechanism in climate change is not merely theoretical

It is very convincing evidence

These results confirm the significance of variations in the rate of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation for abrupt climate changes

 

[Crick]

Thermal EM radiation is the only way the earth can cool. As the top of the troposphere cools, the earth radiates less heat. That means the lower atmosphere retains more heat, and the earth globally warms where we are and not where the balloons fly.

Poster EMH is not talking about all balloon data but a specific set gathered many years ago that was found to have calibration problems. The same with his satellite data. The instance was quite a puzzle because the balloon data and satellite data roughly agreed with each other but disagreed with all other temperature data being gathered. The folks in charge of it, Christy and Spencer of course, disagreed with the rest of the world and insisted theirs was right. Eventually, though, it became obvious that the balloons and the satellite both had problems that left them both about equally wrong and even Christy and Spencer were finally convinced. EMH's claims are ALL based on data taken back in the early 2000s. He believes everything since, including the corrected data that Christy and Spencer now back, is fraudulent.

Best of luck with him.

 

[Wuwei]

Poster EMH is not talking about all balloon data but a specific set gathered many years ago that was found to have calibration problems. The same with his satellite data. The instance was quite a puzzle because the balloon data and satellite data roughly agreed with each other but disagreed with all other temperature data being gathered. The folks in charge of it, Christy and Spencer of course, disagreed with the rest of the world and insisted theirs was right. Eventually, though, it became obvious that the balloons and the satellite both had problems that left them both about equally wrong and even Christy and Spencer were finally convinced. EMH's claims are ALL based on data taken back in the early 2000s. He believes everything since, including the corrected data that Christy and Spencer now back, is fraudulent.

Best of luck with him.

That explains things. At the time I posted the above, I thought EMH was a reasonable logical person. But I soon found out he isn't, and has a one track mind on his "5 questions" that he posted everywhere.

 

[Robert W]

Yup
Deniers are totally confused when they buy into “ Tuckerisms from science illiterate sources.

You are so confused you pretend you are Dennis Eckersley.

 

[Dagosa]

You are so confused you pretend you are Dennis Eckersley.

Go back to bed bozo …..