Why Putin wants a Trump victory

[JakeStarkey]

1. Trump has openly supported Russian control of Crimea, no other country will
2. Trump seeks to destabilize NATO
3. Trump will not enforce human rights violations and supports torture and the killing of terrorists families
4. Trump promises to disrupt our trade agreements opening the door for Russia
5. Trump advocates US isolationism opening the door for increase Russian influence

Why Putin wants a Trump victory (so much he might even be trying to help him)



x

MSN owned by Globalist scumbag Bill Gates.
Move along.

Yeah, the Trump campaign is coming apart.

So relax and enjoy the show.

This has been so easy since the convention, watching Comrade Trump and campaign become such a wreck.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The far right smell of fear is very, very strong, almost repugnant.

 

[Redfish]

The far right smell of fear is very, very strong, almost repugnant.

LOL, kinda like the smell emanating from the dead bodies showing up around the Clintons.

But continue to gloat, the last laugh is the one that counts, and you wont have that one.

 

[rightwinger]

The Russian people are good people just like the American people are good people. There is no reason why we cannot have good relations with Russia. The cold war is over. Russia and the USA could destroy ISIS in one week-----------and that should be done.

Putin prefers Trump because strength respects strength. Obama and Clinton are weak and untrustworthy. Good international relations require honest and strong negotiators who want the best for their countries, but also understand that the only good deals are win/win deals. Trump and Putin know how to get things done.

Putin prefers Trump because he knows much of our strength comes from our international alliances

Trump has openly challenged those alliances and seeks to weaken them

Putin prefers the isolationist policies that Trump is advocating

more bullshit. expecting the members of NATO to pay their fair share doesn't weaken anything. We cannot afford to continue to go into more debt trying to police the world on our own.

Trump has openly questioned our role in NATO and has inferred that it is obsolete

Putin smiled that day

 

[Katzndogz]

The Russian people are good people just like the American people are good people. There is no reason why we cannot have good relations with Russia. The cold war is over. Russia and the USA could destroy ISIS in one week-----------and that should be done.

Putin prefers Trump because strength respects strength. Obama and Clinton are weak and untrustworthy. Good international relations require honest and strong negotiators who want the best for their countries, but also understand that the only good deals are win/win deals. Trump and Putin know how to get things done.

Putin prefers Trump because he knows much of our strength comes from our international alliances

Trump has openly challenged those alliances and seeks to weaken them

Putin prefers the isolationist policies that Trump is advocating

more bullshit. expecting the members of NATO to pay their fair share doesn't weaken anything. We cannot afford to continue to go into more debt trying to police the world on our own.

Trump has openly questioned our role in NATO and has inferred that it is obsolete

Putin smiled that day

We have been NATO's ***** for too long. It's time that they started paying their way.

 

[Redfish]

The Russian people are good people just like the American people are good people. There is no reason why we cannot have good relations with Russia. The cold war is over. Russia and the USA could destroy ISIS in one week-----------and that should be done.

Putin prefers Trump because strength respects strength. Obama and Clinton are weak and untrustworthy. Good international relations require honest and strong negotiators who want the best for their countries, but also understand that the only good deals are win/win deals. Trump and Putin know how to get things done.

Putin prefers Trump because he knows much of our strength comes from our international alliances

Trump has openly challenged those alliances and seeks to weaken them

Putin prefers the isolationist policies that Trump is advocating

more bullshit. expecting the members of NATO to pay their fair share doesn't weaken anything. We cannot afford to continue to go into more debt trying to police the world on our own.

Trump has openly questioned our role in NATO and has inferred that it is obsolete

Putin smiled that day

That is a lie. What he questioned is why we are funding the majority of NATO expenses and that all of the members should pay their fair share.

I thought you libs were all about "paying your fair share".

 

[rightwinger]

The Russian people are good people just like the American people are good people. There is no reason why we cannot have good relations with Russia. The cold war is over. Russia and the USA could destroy ISIS in one week-----------and that should be done.

Putin prefers Trump because strength respects strength. Obama and Clinton are weak and untrustworthy. Good international relations require honest and strong negotiators who want the best for their countries, but also understand that the only good deals are win/win deals. Trump and Putin know how to get things done.

Putin prefers Trump because he knows much of our strength comes from our international alliances

Trump has openly challenged those alliances and seeks to weaken them

Putin prefers the isolationist policies that Trump is advocating

more bullshit. expecting the members of NATO to pay their fair share doesn't weaken anything. We cannot afford to continue to go into more debt trying to police the world on our own.

Trump has openly questioned our role in NATO and has inferred that it is obsolete

Putin smiled that day

That is a lie. What he questioned is why we are funding the majority of NATO expenses and that all of the members should pay their fair share.

I thought you libs were all about "paying your fair share".

Trump went beyond the funding of NATO to openly mocking its relevance. NATO has been a thorn in Russia's side for 70 years. There is nothing Putin would like more than a weakened alliance

Trump: NATO Is Obsolete And Expensive, "Doesn't Have The Right Countries In It For Terrorism"

 

[JakeStarkey]

The far right smell of fear is very, very strong, almost repugnant.

LOL, kinda like the smell emanating from the dead bodies showing up around the Clintons.

But continue to gloat, the last laugh is the one that counts, and you wont have that one.

Yeah, I will. Trump will lose. HRC will serve four years, and the progressive populist strains in both parties for reform will bring new candidates in 2020.

 

[JimH52]

If Comrade Trump were elected, Poootin would have a free hand to march into eastern Europe and who knows how much further...

 

[Redfish]

The Russian people are good people just like the American people are good people. There is no reason why we cannot have good relations with Russia. The cold war is over. Russia and the USA could destroy ISIS in one week-----------and that should be done.

Putin prefers Trump because strength respects strength. Obama and Clinton are weak and untrustworthy. Good international relations require honest and strong negotiators who want the best for their countries, but also understand that the only good deals are win/win deals. Trump and Putin know how to get things done.

Putin prefers Trump because he knows much of our strength comes from our international alliances

Trump has openly challenged those alliances and seeks to weaken them

Putin prefers the isolationist policies that Trump is advocating

more bullshit. expecting the members of NATO to pay their fair share doesn't weaken anything. We cannot afford to continue to go into more debt trying to police the world on our own.

Trump has openly questioned our role in NATO and has inferred that it is obsolete

Putin smiled that day

That is a lie. What he questioned is why we are funding the majority of NATO expenses and that all of the members should pay their fair share.

I thought you libs were all about "paying your fair share".

Trump went beyond the funding of NATO to openly mocking its relevance. NATO has been a thorn in Russia's side for 70 years. There is nothing Putin would like more than a weakened alliance

Trump: NATO Is Obsolete And Expensive, "Doesn't Have The Right Countries In It For Terrorism"

What he said is true. the world has changed, we need to change too------------------or we can become a third world nation like Obama and Clinton want us to.

 

[Jroc]

The far right smell of fear is very, very strong, almost repugnant.

You're smelling your own bullshit fake

The Clinton Foundation, State and Kremlin Connections

Read it here for free


WSJ: The Clinton Foundation, State and Kremlin Connections - Breitbart

Hillary Clinton touts her tenure as secretary of state as a time of hardheaded realism and “commercial diplomacy” that advanced American national and commercial interests. But her handling of a major technology transfer initiative at the heart of Washington’s effort to “reset” relations with Russia raises serious questions about her record. Far from enhancing American national interests, Mrs. Clinton’s efforts in this area may have substantially undermined U.S. national security.

Consider Skolkovo, an “innovation city” of 30,000 people on the outskirts of Moscow, billed as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley—and a core piece of Mrs. Clinton’s quarterbacking of the Russian reset.

Following his 2009 visit to Moscow, President Obama announced the creation of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission. Mrs. Clinton as secretary of state directed the American side, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov represented the Russians. The stated goal at the time: “identifying areas of cooperation and pursuing joint projects and actions that strengthen strategic stability, international security, economic well-being, and the development of ties between the Russian and American people.”

 

[Redfish]

If Comrade Trump were elected, Poootin would have a free hand to march into eastern Europe and who knows how much further...

bullshit, just the opposite is true. Hillary would do nothing to stop him, just like Obama did nothing.

 

[Katzndogz]

The far right smell of fear is very, very strong, almost repugnant.

You're smelling your own bullshit fake

The Clinton Foundation, State and Kremlin Connections

Read it here for free


WSJ: The Clinton Foundation, State and Kremlin Connections - Breitbart

Hillary Clinton touts her tenure as secretary of state as a time of hardheaded realism and “commercial diplomacy” that advanced American national and commercial interests. But her handling of a major technology transfer initiative at the heart of Washington’s effort to “reset” relations with Russia raises serious questions about her record. Far from enhancing American national interests, Mrs. Clinton’s efforts in this area may have substantially undermined U.S. national security.

Consider Skolkovo, an “innovation city” of 30,000 people on the outskirts of Moscow, billed as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley—and a core piece of Mrs. Clinton’s quarterbacking of the Russian reset.

Following his 2009 visit to Moscow, President Obama announced the creation of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission. Mrs. Clinton as secretary of state directed the American side, and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov represented the Russians. The stated goal at the time: “identifying areas of cooperation and pursuing joint projects and actions that strengthen strategic stability, international security, economic well-being, and the development of ties between the Russian and American people.”

You are interfering with another Democrat lie. They are screaming in their death throes.

 

[Redfish]

The far right smell of fear is very, very strong, almost repugnant.

LOL, kinda like the smell emanating from the dead bodies showing up around the Clintons.

But continue to gloat, the last laugh is the one that counts, and you wont have that one.

Yeah, I will. Trump will lose. HRC will serve four years, and the progressive populist strains in both parties for reform will bring new candidates in 2020.

progressive populist is an oxymoron.

 

[the_human_being]

No question that Putin prefers Comrade Donald who will weaken America.

Yes, Putin knows that if Hillary is elected, she will declare war on Russia and China. She is hell bent on removing Assaud in Syria and turn it into even a stronger ISIS hell hole the way she and Obama did in Libya. Obama and Hillary have already lost the entire Middle East.

 

[Katzndogz]

If Comrade Trump were elected, Poootin would have a free hand to march into eastern Europe and who knows how much further...

Have you seen the news today? It doesn't look like Putin is afraid of bammy or hilly. Trump or no Trump, Russia will do whatever it wishes to do. Right now Russia intends to restore Ukraine to the Russian fold and a generous number of Ukrainians wish to go.

 

[Redfish]

Hillary would make Mexico part of the USA.

 

[Katzndogz]

Hillary would make Mexico part of the USA.

Hillary would sell the USA to Mexico.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The far right smell of fear is very, very strong, almost repugnant.

LOL, kinda like the smell emanating from the dead bodies showing up around the Clintons.

But continue to gloat, the last laugh is the one that counts, and you wont have that one.

Yeah, I will. Trump will lose. HRC will serve four years, and the progressive populist strains in both parties for reform will bring new candidates in 2020.

progressive populist is an oxymoron.

Not at all. Your statement clearly shows your lack of education. Progressivism is a reform philosophy, using Big Government to make changes socially, culturally, economically, and politically. Populism is a reform impulse from the people up. Both the philosophy and the impulse have right and left wings.

Trump's campaign is crumbling and your fear is clear and present, Redfish.

 

[the_human_being]

Hillary is being investigated for perjury before a Congressional Investigating Committee. Her testimony before that Committee was televised and also recorded. In her own words while under oath, Hillary testified that she neither sent nor received any classified materials. We watched her testimony and heard her words.

The FBI director has publicly stated that Hillary did indeed send and receive classified materials. The FBI director works for the Obama Administration.

Now, it is not rocket science here to determine that (1) our own ears and eyes are lying to us as well as is the FBI Director himself lying to us OR (2) Hillary is lying and has committed perjury before a Congressional Committee.

Those are the only two conclusions available to us.