Yeah that's why Durham famous investigation was a flop. He wasn't looking at the big, big picture....
He is certainly accused of numerous crimes.
He is not the president and must comply with valid subpoenas like the rest of us do.
Hiding hush money during a campaign is illegal.
Contesting election results is legal and necessary. Then when you lose those challenges and still try to over turn an election by intimidation and subversion, well, we'll have to stay turn to find out how that plays out.
In 2019, Durham reviewed the origins of an FBI investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.
Since there likely was no Russian "interference" in any US election, there was hardly any point.
But the Ukraine is entirely different, with tens of thousands of bodies, murdered by the evil Polish fascists the US hired to do the hit for us.
Being "accused" of numerous old crimes makes Trump less likely to be guilty than if one was accused of a single recent crime.
Since Trump WAS president at one time, then he still holds total authority over all classified docs created by his administration. And no classified docs can EVER legally be subpoenaed.
The judge, prosecutor, and FBI have no clearance.
Only the ex-president who created them does.
That is the law.
The John Edwards case is proof political hush money is NOT illegal.
{...
At one point, the government’s case against John Edwards seemed open and shut: The disgraced former presidential candidate must surely be guilty of something for using a wealthy donor’s six-figure checks to hide a mistress and a love child during the 2008 presidential campaign.
This week, a jury decided just the opposite, concluding in interviews after deadlocking on most of the charges that “the evidence wasn’t there” to convict Mr. Edwards, a former senator and once-favored Democratic presidential candidate, on six counts of election fraud. The jury returned a not guilty verdict on the key charge and deadlocked on the other five.
...}
Its only illegal to pay hush money in order to obstruct justice over an actual crime.
There was ZERO intimidation or subversion by Trump. The call to Georgia everyone heard, was clearly pleading, NOT intimidating in any way. And unarmed demonstration is not "subversion".
But impeaching and indicting Trump clearly IS illegal, and an attempt to bias the up coming election. I have never seen anything that illegal in all US history.
