What does that have to do with Sanctuary cities? What about Kathryn Steinle? Her right to live was denied by the scumbag mayor of San Francisco who illegally provides sanctuary for criminals.
And I am happy to see her parents using the courts to try to get that changed.
Why isn't a judge putting the mayor in prison for refusing to obey the law? Why aren't all you liberal hypocrites all howling for these scum to obey the law?
Sanctuary cities aren't breaking the law, they just are spending their time and money on a Federal issue.
Wrong. They are actively breaking the law.
No, they are not.
"Sanctuary city is a term that is applied by some to cities in the
United States or
Canada that have policies designed to not persecute
undocumented immigrants. These practices can be by law (de jure) or they can be by habit (de facto). The term generally applies to cities that do not allow municipal funds or resources to be used to enforce federal immigration laws, usually by not allowing police or municipal employees to inquire about an individual's immigration status. The designation has no legal meaning.
[1]"
Sanctuary city - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1. Not asking about immigration status is not against the law.
2. Telling the local Barney Fifes not to ask is also not against the law, immigration is a Federal issue.
3. Holding an illegal (for deportation) after a criminal sentence has been completed is currently unconstitutional.
4. In this particular case, the Feds had him before they turned him over to the city, which they did not have to do. They could have deported him, and didn't.