Why isn't MAGA spending more time, on this site, calling out Trump's accomplishment in the Middle East

[hadit]

He did not focus on the other side as being the cause of all problems. He did not fire or destroy anyone who disagreed with him.

Well, there was that whole ranting in front of a bloodred backdrop, waving fists and yelling thing.

 

[ElmerMudd]

If by “most of the world” you mean you, I absolutely don’t care.

Even if you had the right to speak for others and even if you also chose to be honest, and even if your claim were actually true, I frankly still wouldn’t care.

The reality here is glaringly obvious. You don’t like the fact that you can’t prevail in a discussion with me or a debate against me. So, now, ploddingly, predictably and unconvincingly, you go for the ad hominem.

Elmo, you poor pathetic asshole, try to post ON topic. Or do you prefer to run away from your own thread?

I’m not upset with you, by the way. You’re pitiable, you fuckin’ retard.

"I’m not upset with you, by the way. You’re pitiable, you fuckin’ retard."
The rant of a person who has a limited vocabulary and a limited IQ. At least he keeps reaffirming who he is.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Names? Who do you consider "moderate?"

Don Bacon, Larry Hogan, Brian Fitzpatrick

 

[Blisterfinger]

Give up. If you are guessing it cannot be a cult leader.

You are in a cult and you don't even know who your leader is . How dumb is that? Where do you get your talking points from?? Are you too ashamed to say? You are obviously in a cult, that you demonstrated on Saturday., Was that you and the Frog outfit? Man your cult looks stupid ! Juvenile
, who was in charge of the organization of that? That would give you a clue as to who your leader is, since you don't seem to know or are too ashamed to say. What a dumbass you have turned out to be. Wow

 

[BackAgain]

"I’m not upset with you, by the way. You’re pitiable, you fuckin’ retard."
The rant of a person who has a limited vocabulary and a limited IQ. At least he keeps reaffirming who he is.

You seem unaware that you keep saying the same nonsensical crap yourself, over and over.

The fact is, you do seem hell bent on posting off topic and more than willing to derail your own bullshit thread in the process.

If you really have that much of a desire to post off topic, which it appears you do, let’s talk about something more interesting than the crap you usually focus on.

What are your thoughts about modifying the infield fly rule?

By the way, you’re still a retard.

 

[ElmerMudd]

You seem unaware that you keep saying the same nonsensical crap yourself, over and over.

The fact is, you do seem hell bent on posting off topic and more than willing to derail your own bullshit thread in the process.

If you really have that much of a desire to post off topic, which it appears you do, let’s talk about something more interesting than the crap you usually focus on.

What are your thoughts about modifying the infield fly rule?

By the way, you’re still a retard.

The "nonsensical crap" I post is who I am.
The "nonsensical crap" you post is who you are.

Clarify don't modify the infield fly rule.

 

[BackAgain]

The "nonsensical crap" I post is who I am.

So at least you admit that you’re crap.

The "nonsensical crap" you post is who you are.

I don’t post nonsensical crap. Your labels don’t make it true. You’re a retard.

Clarify don't modify the infield fly rule.

There was once a published law review article about it.

 

[ElmerMudd]

So at least you admit that you’re crap.

I don’t post nonsensical crap. Your labels don’t make it true. You’re a retard.

There was once a published law review article about it.

Your posts say who you are and my posts say who I am. I don't want you to like me. That would be a concern.
You don't know baseball if you are talking law review. The review is by those who play and know baseball.

 

[BackAgain]

Your posts say who you are and my posts say who I am.

And you acknowledged that you are crap. Appreciated.

I don't want you to like me.

No worries. I’m not a fan of crap.

That would be a concern.

Again. No worries.

You don't know baseball if you are talking law review.

You don’t grasp any humor at all. Personally, I do find it funny that a law school’s Law Review would publish an article about a baseball rule.

Did you lose your sense of humor in a tragic accident or were you born without a sense of humor?

The review is by those who play and know baseball.

Crawl back into your coma.

 

[ElmerMudd]

And you acknowledged that you are crap. Appreciated.

No worries. I’m not a fan of crap.

Again. No worries.


You don’t grasp any humor at all. Personally, I do find it funny that a law school’s Law Review would publish an article about a baseball rule.

Did you lose your sense of humor in a tragic accident or were you born without a sense of humor?




Crawl back into your coma.

It is obvious you don't now baseball. Were you into ballet when you were in school. You come across as a ballerina, not a baseball player.

 

[BackAgain]

For those who are interested, I had forgotten which Law Review it really was. I regret the misattribution to the Buffalo Law School’s Law Review. My mistake.

It was actually from the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5322&context=penn_law_review

Note: I was also incorrect in referring to it as an “article.” It was instead given different nomenclature. It was an “Aside.”

As an aside, Elmo is a retard.

 

[BackAgain]

It is obvious you don't now baseball. Were you into ballet when you were in school. You come across as a ballerina, not a baseball player.

Ah. You’re so disdainful of anyone who disagrees with you, you retard, that you engage in feeble ad hominem efforts despite having previously offered chastisement to some whose ad hominem.

Your hypocrisy is massive. Your intellect, not so much.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Ah. You’re so disdainful of anyone who disagrees with you, you retard, that you engage in feeble ad hominem efforts despite having previously offered chastisement to some whose ad hominem.

Your hypocrisy is massive. Your intellect, not so much.

It is not that you disagree with me, it is you don't know what you are talking about. There is an argument to change the infield fly rule but you don't present it because you don't know baseball.

 

[BackAgain]

It is not that you disagree with me, it is you don't know what you are talking about. There is an argument to change the infield fly rule but you don't present it because you don't know baseball.

No. It’s that you can’t recognize a joke under any circumstances and that you’re a bloviating pantload.

If it makes you feel any better, I grant you permission to continue to imagine that you are a font of knowledge on baseball and that I haven’t been an ardent follower of the sport for 56 years.

 

[ElmerMudd]

No. It’s that you can’t recognize a joke under any circumstances and that you’re a bloviating pantload.

If it makes you feel any better, I grant you permission to continue to imagine that you are a font of knowledge on baseball and that I haven’t been an ardent follower of the sport for 56 years.

If you had coached baseball, you would have a better understanding.

 

[BackAgain]

If you had coached baseball, you would have a better understanding.

Your fixated on the wrong thing on the mistaken notion that you’re scoring points.

I couldn’t care less about your opinion about my baseball rules acumen. It isn’t the point and never was.

But please, I urge you to continue making a public asshole of yourself over your irrelevant quibble.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Your fixated on the wrong thing on the mistaken notion that you’re scoring points.

I couldn’t care less about your opinion about my baseball rules acumen. It isn’t the point and never was.

But please, I urge you to continue making a public asshole of yourself over your irrelevant quibble.

Have you ever coached baseball?

 

[BackAgain]

Have you ever coached baseball?

You need to go post in the sports forum.

 

[Clipper]

You tell me I'm not dealing with reality. And then you compare Trump to Jim Jones ! sincerely laughable thanks for the chuckle!
I pretty much find everything Trump does to be for the betterment of America. you know America first concept?
I already explained to you how I am doing fine with trump .what part of what I said.Don't you understand ?

We know that by the stink of his ass on your breath. Btw Ace, the peace deal will go swirling in the bowl because Bibi will not want to be known as the one who failed to wipe Hamas off the face of the Earth.

Thanks for playing.

Save half of that shit sandwich for Trump.

 

[Blisterfinger]

We know that by the stink of his ass on your breath. Btw Ace, the peace deal will go swirling in the bowl because Bibi will not want to be known as the one who failed to wipe Hamas off the face of the Earth.

Thanks for playing.

Save half of that shit sandwich for Trump.

You are a bitter little ***** aren't you. Trump must have shit on you hard! LOL you must be really stupid for that to have happened.