Why Isn't Darwin Banned from Schools and Libraries?

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
92,049
62,948
2,605
Right coast, classified
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?

image.jpeg
image.jpeg
image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?
No books should be banned; over time they become historical pieces.
BTW, The Origin of Species is the one that still applies today, more or less.
 
Why do right wing conservative snowflakes find it necessary to always ask why the 'left' does or doesn't do something? Is it insecurity? Are they trolls? Do they not have any thought or belief of their own? Right wing snowflakes are empty without pointing fingers at another. It is why hate motivates them for their own emptiness is a real burden.

"The remarkable thing is that we really love our neighbors as ourselves: we do unto others as we do unto ourselves. We hate others when we hate ourselves. We are tolerant of others when we tolerate ourselves. We forgive others when we forgive ourselves." Eric Hoffer
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?
No books should be banned; over time they become historical pieces.
BTW, The Origin of Species is the one that still applies today, more or less.
That white people are more advanced than blacks?
 
Why do right wing conservative snowflakes find it necessary to always ask why the 'left' does or doesn't do something? Is it insecurity? Are they trolls? Do they not have any thought or belief of their own? Right wing snowflakes are empty without pointing fingers at another. It is why hate motivates them for their own emptiness is a real burden.

"The remarkable thing is that we really love our neighbors as ourselves: we do unto others as we do unto ourselves. We hate others when we hate ourselves. We are tolerant of others when we tolerate ourselves. We forgive others when we forgive ourselves." Eric Hoffer
HYPOCRITICUS MAXIMUS.
 
Why do right wing conservative snowflakes find it necessary to always ask why the 'left' does or doesn't do something? Is it insecurity? Are they trolls? Do they not have any thought or belief of their own? Right wing snowflakes are empty without pointing fingers at another. It is why hate motivates them for their own emptiness is a real burden.

"The remarkable thing is that we really love our neighbors as ourselves: we do unto others as we do unto ourselves. We hate others when we hate ourselves. We are tolerant of others when we tolerate ourselves. We forgive others when we forgive ourselves." Eric Hoffer


Because we are constantly amazed at the ability of liberals to believe absolutely contradictory ideas, or hold one idea and act in a completely opposite fashion.
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?

View attachment 201690 View attachment 201691 View attachment 201692 View attachment 201693
Be patient. Just a little more Republican gerrymandering required.
 
Thats a pretty good argument, Weather.
I dont have anything to say!
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?

View attachment 201690 View attachment 201691 View attachment 201692 View attachment 201693
Be patient. Just a little more Republican gerrymandering required.





A list of books currently banned by the Left in various sites was provided in the OP.


Your attempt to turn this around, fails.
 
Why do right wing conservative snowflakes find it necessary to always ask why the 'left' does or doesn't do something? Is it insecurity? Are they trolls? Do they not have any thought or belief of their own? Right wing snowflakes are empty without pointing fingers at another. It is why hate motivates them for their own emptiness is a real burden.

"The remarkable thing is that we really love our neighbors as ourselves: we do unto others as we do unto ourselves. We hate others when we hate ourselves. We are tolerant of others when we tolerate ourselves. We forgive others when we forgive ourselves." Eric Hoffer
It is mostly related to empathy.
Some have it for ALL people, and other animals too, and some have it only for their family or people like themselves.
Then, there are psychopaths.
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?
No books should be banned; over time they become historical pieces.
BTW, The Origin of Species is the one that still applies today, more or less.
That white people are more advanced than blacks?
Unfortunately. that was the predominant belief prior to 1900, and afterwards in some southern states in USA, no?
Why focus on that? Darwin’s major contribution is his theory on “origins of species”, and his ideas on that issue is relevant today.
 
Right off hand, I see no need to ban Charles Darwin from schools and libraries.


He's dead.
As you cheer about statues of dead people being torn down.


I do? I know I am getting up there by now, but I can't seem to recall doing that. I have always been against destroying art to satisfy a rigid political outlook, myself.

It's always amazing to me how those at both ends of the spectrum can take the tiniest thing and project an entire panoply of opinions unto the other person.
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?
No books should be banned; over time they become historical pieces.
BTW, The Origin of Species is the one that still applies today, more or less.
That white people are more advanced than blacks?
No clear understanding as to why trumpanzees get labeled racist. It's a puzzlement.
 

Forum List

Back
Top