Zone1 Why is White Culture a Bad Thing?

It’s not so much white culture that is the target, it’s American culture. The objective is to destroy American foundational culture in order to pave the way for Marxist/globalist control. Whiteness is an opportunistic angle of attack since the culture’s founding is rooted in west Europeans.
The destruction of European culture is further along than the destruction of American culture. The Churches of England are already being burned.
 
"You" racists ?

View attachment 1222908

Blacks have a history of enslaving and selling blacks.....the inconvenient truth

As far as "white guilt".....Dunno, you may be right....it may be white idiocy.
Blacks in AMURIKA are by far the wealthiest, most accomplished blacks in the known universe. Why did they only get that way in a WHITE MANS WORLD?

If I was a smart black person (and ya never know, I could be), then I would be really terrified at the prospect of losing white people such as those who created civilization and a means for all races to excel and prosper. Good lord, what would be left? (Somalia, Nigeria for all).

Civilization NEEDS smart, compassionate whites and blacks etc. So yeah, call me racist.


You racists ignore your own history of enslaving each other that began in Ancient Greece. Now, when you can show me the Africans that floated into Europe with ships full of slaves to sell to the white man, you can try making that current false equivalence as an agument. If you take a look at wealth in the world instead of lying to yourself about America, you will discover that you claim about black in America is inaccurate. Whites did not create civilization, an if I were a smart white person, I would quit repeating the nonsense you posted here. Somalia is the way it is because of the white man.

 
At the end of a gun.
Can you name any major country which did not begin itself at the end of a gun? Did not have to fight to conquer territory for their own? You go work on that then get back to me with documentation.

You'll probably need to go back about 40,000 years when Neanderthal were first spreading northward into Europe from Africa.

What does that tell you?
It tells me you're totally ignorant of history.
 
Can you name any major country which did not begin itself at the end of a gun? Did not have to fight to conquer territory for their own? You go work on that then get back to me with documentation.

You'll probably need to go back about 40,000 years when Neanderthal were first spreading northward into Europe from Africa.
I don’t think it was Neanderthals who left Africa 40,000 years ago. It was their ancestors, maybe 200,000 years ago.
 
I don’t think it was Neanderthals who left Africa 40,000 years ago. It was their ancestors, maybe 200,000 years ago.

Well, their ancestors were homo heidelbergensis, but the point remains the same. Even then, when early hominids spread northward into Europe and Eurasia, they still had to compete with native animal species there, hunting them, beating them off the land with rocks and sticks because guns had not been invented yet.

Just about the only species never to take up territory without encroaching on others was probably back when plant life first began to develop at the water's edge then slowly move in to populate the land.

Even then, those plant species were encroaching over bacteria and other micro-organisms living in the soil.
 
Hmmm.

Other white values.

Racism
Colonialism
Imperialism
Wealth inequality


It's easy to be "moral" when you go to sleep with a full belly in a warm bed.
Whites are actually LESS racist than other racial groups. Both the Japanese and Chinese are more guilty of colonialism than Whites. Every race is guilty of Imperialism. Wealth inequality is GREATER in non-White countries than it is in White countries.
 
Whites are actually LESS racist than other racial groups. Both the Japanese and Chinese are more guilty of colonialism than Whites.

The Japanese were brutal slave owners. Whoa be onto you if you were captured by the Japs as an enemy of the state. You were better off dead than a slave of the Japanese.
 
The Japanese were brutal slave owners. Whoa be onto you if you were captured by the Japs as an enemy of the state. You were better off dead than a slave of the Japanese.
The religion that historically had the most slaves were Muslims. Think of the irony with blacks converting to Islam and Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam.

IOW, blacks are adopting the religion of those who were the worst of the slaveowners.
 
The religion that historically had the most slaves were Muslims.

Yeah maybe, I'm not sure. It is a norm of nature that the strong generally rule over the weak, conquer them, destroy them, subsume them, annihilate them.

It even holds true in the plant and insect kingdom.
 
Hmmm.

Other white values.

Racism
Colonialism
Imperialism
Wealth inequality


It's easy to be "moral" when you go to sleep with a full belly in a warm bed.
I just realized another ignorant comment on this post the one about wealth inequality. Do know who the richest man in history was ? Mansa Musa a West African ruler of the Mali Empire. He gave away so much gold on a pilgrimage to Meca that he caused 10 years of hyperinflation in Cairo.
 
Yeah, the conservatives were so good at it during the colononial days that they quickly imported labor to do the hard work.
lol ! the Dem party started a war to keep slaves .. if Dems were trapped on an island there would be chaos and infighting !
 
No, actually, I wouldn't expect them to do that at all.

Very few people are planners who find solutions.

If you put 100 people on an island they won't pick a leader, but they will find someone to hate.

And eat,

of course you believe that .. you are wired to think that way .. you're a leftist after all ..
 
Hmmm.

Other white values.

Racism
Colonialism
Imperialism
Wealth inequality


It's easy to be "moral" when you go to sleep with a full belly in a warm bed.

Other white values.

Racism
Colonialism
Imperialism
Wealth inequality


Aren't those values of all colors?
 
IM2 keeps derailing my thread. The point is that a BLACK museum listed all sorts of positive attributes, and labeled them “traits of whiteness.”

So if these traits are associated SPECIFICALLY with whites, what’s wrong with white culture? They are all behaviors and choices that correlate with a successful life.
I believe they erred in publishing this.

But aside from that, you're mistaking things that are sufficient for success as necessary for success. While many of them definitely help and some of them may even be admirable, they are not the only route to success.

And they definitely are not attributes that belong solely to white culture.
 
15th post
Can you name any major country which did not begin itself at the end of a gun? Did not have to fight to conquer territory for their own? You go work on that then get back to me with documentation.

You'll probably need to go back about 40,000 years when Neanderthal were first spreading northward into Europe from Africa.

It tells me you're totally ignorant of history.
Struck a nerve?

Yet I know enough about AMERICAN history and human behavior to observe that every time this topic comes up, you all have to revert to other continents and century upon century in the past, in an attempt to justify the brutality of how our nation came to be.

Just FYI, "other people did it too" is the weakest of all arguments when trying to defend a position. particularly one that's indefensible.

What is more telling is that the powers that be ensured that they were the only ones with guns. So it wasn't intellectual or God-given superiority that allowed them to prevail & advance, it was brute force and being bloodthirsty enough to kill anyone and everyone who stood in their way on their quest for wealth and power.
 
I believe they erred in publishing this.
Indeed they did. But it remains that the Board of Directors of the African-American Museum approved an exhibit which listed positive, admirable traits and behaviors as associated with “Whiteness.” It remains inexplicable as to what they were thinking,

But aside from that, you're mistaking things that are sufficient for success as necessary for success. While many of them definitely help and some of them may even be admirable, they are not the only route to success.
They are not necessary for success, but they are strongly correlated with success. If you were on the Board of Directors, wouldn’t you want to encourage behaviors that make it more likely black people would have a successful life rather than demean these behaviors as “whiteness traits”?

And they definitely are not attributes that belong solely to white culture.
Of course not. That’s the point: the African-American Museum inexplicably said they did.
 
Back
Top Bottom