Probably not hitting big, because so far, it is simply nonspecific accusations to justify freezing, but does not appear to rise to the level of legal charges prosecutions, or examples of how any specific charges was carried out. Makes it all sound like political B#llsh!t. No way on earth to know whether legitimate or not. Looks like, in many cases, might be the kind of B#llsh!t you might get if a company is stupid enough to turn an non-paid consultant loose in their corporate finance department. Big surprise, the only thing not being found problematic or fraud enough to be stopped is any contract or funding going to the non-paid consultants companies. Go Figure.