Why Is This Fact Not Taught In Churches?

[DOTR]

Was doing some research on the bible and was reading Genesis 2:11-13. The first 2 nations that are mentioned in the bible are Black nations. The first nation listed is Havilah. Havilah is the son of Kush and it was located in East Africa. The second nation is of course Kush. Kush is the son of Ham and it was also located in east Africa. It is known today as Ethiopia.

Bible Gateway passage: Genesis 2:11-13 - English Standard Version

11 The name of the first is the Pishon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12 And the gold of that land is good; bdellium and onyx stone are there. 13 The name of the second river is the Gihon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Cush.

Because republican Jesus looks like this:

View attachment 228484

Thats just Jesus. But i am not surprised you associate republican with Jesus. Democrats hate one thing above almost any other..and that is Christianity.

 

[Asclepias]

Your own link says the chimp like hominins had pale skin. By the time homo sapiens evolved the skin was dark. Light skin in homo sapiens didnt appear until about 8k years ago and that was due to a mutation.

Nothing you posted is news to me and has nothing to do with what I asked about the bible.

Your ancestors never evolved past dark skin. Its because your ancestors back bred with Homo heidelbegensis and homo erectus and other archaic and proto-humans. This type of limited breeding often results in stasis.
They looked like this.

View attachment 228637 View attachment 228638

And members of the Pan genus looked like this...these are the "homins" you speak of.

View attachment 228639

You will note that the dark skin tone is common with the more primitive species. Light skin didn't evolve until much later in more advanced species such as Homo neanderthalis...along with several other advantageous evolutionary advancements such as red and blonde hair, lactose tolerance, a less violent nature, and a tendency to develop civilization.


Let me help you here...early=more primitive
late=more advanced

By definition.

Yeah kind of weird how those primitive people taught you savages civilization, how to bath, and stop eating each other in the caves of europe.

 

[DOTR]

Your own link says the chimp like hominins had pale skin. By the time homo sapiens evolved the skin was dark. Light skin in homo sapiens didnt appear until about 8k years ago and that was due to a mutation.

Nothing you posted is news to me and has nothing to do with what I asked about the bible.

Your ancestors never evolved past dark skin. Its because your ancestors back bred with Homo heidelbegensis and homo erectus and other archaic and proto-humans. This type of limited breeding often results in stasis.
They looked like this.

View attachment 228637 View attachment 228638

And members of the Pan genus looked like this...these are the "homins" you speak of.

View attachment 228639

You will note that the dark skin tone is common with the more primitive species. Light skin didn't evolve until much later in more advanced species such as Homo neanderthalis...along with several other advantageous evolutionary advancements such as red and blonde hair, lactose tolerance, a less violent nature, and a tendency to develop civilization.


Let me help you here...early=more primitive
late=more advanced

By definition.

Yeah kind of weird how those primitive people taught you savages civilization, how to bath, and stop eating each other in the caves of europe.

How could they? They never left central africa until they sold each other to Portuguese slave traders and were transported all over the world.
That is one thing I will say for the black sub saharan africans. Nobody can accuse them of colonialism or aggression towards anyone but other blacks. Thats just the way it is when you cant build ships or clocks and all the things that help a people spread and conquer the world.

 

[gtopa1]

It's certainly taught in Synagogues.

So if the OT shows that the Garden of Eden was in East Africa why do some white people dispute that Adam and Eve were Black?

Who cares? What colour skin have chimps got?

These early humans probably had pale skin, much like humans' closest living relative, the chimpanzee, which is white under its fur. Around 1.2 million to 1.8 million years ago, early Homo sapiens evolved darkskin.Feb 25, 2014

Odd Cause of Humans' Dark Skin Proposed

New gene variants reveal the evolution of human skin color

By Ann GibbonsOct. 12, 2017 , 2:00 PM

Most people associate Africans with dark skin. But different groups of people in Africa have almost every skin color on the planet, from deepest black in the Dinka of South Sudan to beige in the San of South Africa. Now, researchers have discovered a handful of new gene variants responsible for this palette of tones.

The study, published online this week in Science, traces the evolution of these genes and how they traveled around the world. While the dark skin of some Pacific Islanders can be traced to Africa, gene variants from Eurasia also seem to have made their way back to Africa. And surprisingly, some of the mutations responsible for lighter skin in Europeans turn out to have an ancient African origin.

“This is really a landmark study of skin color diversity,” says geneticist Greg Barsh of the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology in Huntsville, Alabama.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/new-gene-variants-reveal-evolution-human-skin-color

Looks like your ASS-sumptions need some theory-adjustment.

All Africans are Black seems a rather RACIST slur!!

Greg

Your own link says the chimp like hominins had pale skin. By the time homo sapiens evolved the skin was dark. Light skin in homo sapiens didnt appear until about 8k years ago and that was due to a mutation.

Nothing you posted is news to me and has nothing to do with what I asked about the bible.

So Black skin was an early mutation though not all homo-sapiens in Africa had it. There was a RANGE of skin colours/tones. You didn't read it did you? lol

Greg

No. Black skin appeared in early hominids before they were homo sapiens. The first homo sapiens already had Black skin. White or light skin is what is a relatively recent mutation as I already proved by linking to a scientific peer reviewed study. Of course there is a range of colors. The point being that there are no white Africans unless they were albinos. They were all melinated people. No white skin. None.

Human skin color - Wikipedia

"

1. From about 1.2 million years ago to less than 100,000 years ago, archaic humans, including archaic Homo sapiens, were dark-skinned.
2. As Homo sapiens populations began to migrate, the evolutionary constraint keeping skin dark decreased proportionally to the distance north a population migrated, resulting in a range of skin tones within northern populations.
3. At some point, some northern populations experienced positive selection for lighter skin due to the increased production of vitamin D from sunlight and the genes for darker skin disappeared from these populations.
4. Subsequent migrations into different UV environments and admixture between populations have resulted in the varied range of skin pigmentations we see today."

The new study says the genes for whiteness were "ancient" and "African"........so maybe you should read more.

Greg

 

[there4eyeM]

It could be pointed out that the fact that someone or something says something does not mean that something is a fact.

 

[DOTR]

So if the OT shows that the Garden of Eden was in East Africa why do some white people dispute that Adam and Eve were Black?

Who cares? What colour skin have chimps got?

These early humans probably had pale skin, much like humans' closest living relative, the chimpanzee, which is white under its fur. Around 1.2 million to 1.8 million years ago, early Homo sapiens evolved darkskin.Feb 25, 2014

Odd Cause of Humans' Dark Skin Proposed

New gene variants reveal the evolution of human skin color

By Ann GibbonsOct. 12, 2017 , 2:00 PM

Most people associate Africans with dark skin. But different groups of people in Africa have almost every skin color on the planet, from deepest black in the Dinka of South Sudan to beige in the San of South Africa. Now, researchers have discovered a handful of new gene variants responsible for this palette of tones.

The study, published online this week in Science, traces the evolution of these genes and how they traveled around the world. While the dark skin of some Pacific Islanders can be traced to Africa, gene variants from Eurasia also seem to have made their way back to Africa. And surprisingly, some of the mutations responsible for lighter skin in Europeans turn out to have an ancient African origin.

“This is really a landmark study of skin color diversity,” says geneticist Greg Barsh of the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology in Huntsville, Alabama.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/new-gene-variants-reveal-evolution-human-skin-color

Looks like your ASS-sumptions need some theory-adjustment.

All Africans are Black seems a rather RACIST slur!!

Greg

Your own link says the chimp like hominins had pale skin. By the time homo sapiens evolved the skin was dark. Light skin in homo sapiens didnt appear until about 8k years ago and that was due to a mutation.

Nothing you posted is news to me and has nothing to do with what I asked about the bible.

So Black skin was an early mutation though not all homo-sapiens in Africa had it. There was a RANGE of skin colours/tones. You didn't read it did you? lol

Greg

No. Black skin appeared in early hominids before they were homo sapiens. The first homo sapiens already had Black skin. White or light skin is what is a relatively recent mutation as I already proved by linking to a scientific peer reviewed study. Of course there is a range of colors. The point being that there are no white Africans unless they were albinos. They were all melinated people. No white skin. None.

Human skin color - Wikipedia

"

1. From about 1.2 million years ago to less than 100,000 years ago, archaic humans, including archaic Homo sapiens, were dark-skinned.
2. As Homo sapiens populations began to migrate, the evolutionary constraint keeping skin dark decreased proportionally to the distance north a population migrated, resulting in a range of skin tones within northern populations.
3. At some point, some northern populations experienced positive selection for lighter skin due to the increased production of vitamin D from sunlight and the genes for darker skin disappeared from these populations.
4. Subsequent migrations into different UV environments and admixture between populations have resulted in the varied range of skin pigmentations we see today."

The new study says the genes for whiteness were "ancient" and "African"........so maybe you should read more.

Greg

This changed a few times gtopa as the science media worked on how best to spin it to advance liberal ideas of genetics and race. Some of the articles led off with "despite what you think white skin is recent" while there was a shift later to "white skin was the original color of Africans". And everything in between.
Ill post some examples tomorrow. But it was the same data. Just different spins depending what they thought would be most hurtful to "white thinking" Also, as science has become political rather than evidenced based, they want to push the "out of africa" theory as the only possibility. Their minds are closed on the issue.

A shame but you have to really pick through these papers and weed out the liberalism..

"In many cases, the older variant is responsible for lighter skin, not darker"
The Complex History of the Genes That Color Our Skin - The Atlantic

and/or/which?

"it is now found that for the majority of the time that humans have lived in Europe, the people had dark skin, and the genes signifying light skin only appear within the past 8,000 years. "

White Skin Developed in Europe Only As Recently as 8,000 Years Ago Say Anthropologists

 

[Crepitus]

Was doing some research on the bible and was reading Genesis 2:11-13. The first 2 nations that are mentioned in the bible are Black nations. The first nation listed is Havilah. Havilah is the son of Kush and it was located in East Africa. The second nation is of course Kush. Kush is the son of Ham and it was also located in east Africa. It is known today as Ethiopia.

Bible Gateway passage: Genesis 2:11-13 - English Standard Version

11 The name of the first is the Pishon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12 And the gold of that land is good; bdellium and onyx stone are there. 13 The name of the second river is the Gihon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Cush.

Because republican Jesus looks like this:

View attachment 228484

The funny thing is Jesus looks like us..

And we all know it

I'm actually a white guy but yeah, Jesus, if he was real, wasn't.

 

[Crepitus]

Was doing some research on the bible and was reading Genesis 2:11-13. The first 2 nations that are mentioned in the bible are Black nations. The first nation listed is Havilah. Havilah is the son of Kush and it was located in East Africa. The second nation is of course Kush. Kush is the son of Ham and it was also located in east Africa. It is known today as Ethiopia.

Bible Gateway passage: Genesis 2:11-13 - English Standard Version

11 The name of the first is the Pishon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12 And the gold of that land is good; bdellium and onyx stone are there. 13 The name of the second river is the Gihon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Cush.

Because republican Jesus looks like this:

View attachment 228484

Thats just Jesus. But i am not surprised you associate republican with Jesus. Democrats hate one thing above almost any other..and that is Christianity.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Show us where in the bible the Hebrews were clearly identified as "not Black". Please link to your sources.

"Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses regarding the Cushite woman he had married, for he had married a Cushite woman." - Bamidbar Chapter 12

Yeah, that doesn't say a damned thing about anyone being black or not-black. That would be about "Jew" and "not-Jew".

 

[Cecilie1200]

Truth always matters."thou shalt not bear false witness" If it didnt matter then why are white people so dead set that Hebrews were white when they are clearly identified as Black in the bible?

You care a lot more than they do.

Yes I care about the truth more than most whites I agree.

It's not very important.

It may not be to you but that doesnt have much to do with the facts of my world.

Well, you wanted to know why churches weren't teaching that everyone in the ancient world was black. That's why, it's just not that important.

And also because it's not true.

 

[Asclepias]

So if the OT shows that the Garden of Eden was in East Africa why do some white people dispute that Adam and Eve were Black?

Who cares? What colour skin have chimps got?

These early humans probably had pale skin, much like humans' closest living relative, the chimpanzee, which is white under its fur. Around 1.2 million to 1.8 million years ago, early Homo sapiens evolved darkskin.Feb 25, 2014

Odd Cause of Humans' Dark Skin Proposed

New gene variants reveal the evolution of human skin color

By Ann GibbonsOct. 12, 2017 , 2:00 PM

Most people associate Africans with dark skin. But different groups of people in Africa have almost every skin color on the planet, from deepest black in the Dinka of South Sudan to beige in the San of South Africa. Now, researchers have discovered a handful of new gene variants responsible for this palette of tones.

The study, published online this week in Science, traces the evolution of these genes and how they traveled around the world. While the dark skin of some Pacific Islanders can be traced to Africa, gene variants from Eurasia also seem to have made their way back to Africa. And surprisingly, some of the mutations responsible for lighter skin in Europeans turn out to have an ancient African origin.

“This is really a landmark study of skin color diversity,” says geneticist Greg Barsh of the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology in Huntsville, Alabama.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/new-gene-variants-reveal-evolution-human-skin-color

Looks like your ASS-sumptions need some theory-adjustment.

All Africans are Black seems a rather RACIST slur!!

Greg

Your own link says the chimp like hominins had pale skin. By the time homo sapiens evolved the skin was dark. Light skin in homo sapiens didnt appear until about 8k years ago and that was due to a mutation.

Nothing you posted is news to me and has nothing to do with what I asked about the bible.

So Black skin was an early mutation though not all homo-sapiens in Africa had it. There was a RANGE of skin colours/tones. You didn't read it did you? lol

Greg

No. Black skin appeared in early hominids before they were homo sapiens. The first homo sapiens already had Black skin. White or light skin is what is a relatively recent mutation as I already proved by linking to a scientific peer reviewed study. Of course there is a range of colors. The point being that there are no white Africans unless they were albinos. They were all melinated people. No white skin. None.

Human skin color - Wikipedia

"

1. From about 1.2 million years ago to less than 100,000 years ago, archaic humans, including archaic Homo sapiens, were dark-skinned.
2. As Homo sapiens populations began to migrate, the evolutionary constraint keeping skin dark decreased proportionally to the distance north a population migrated, resulting in a range of skin tones within northern populations.
3. At some point, some northern populations experienced positive selection for lighter skin due to the increased production of vitamin D from sunlight and the genes for darker skin disappeared from these populations.
4. Subsequent migrations into different UV environments and admixture between populations have resulted in the varied range of skin pigmentations we see today."

The new study says the genes for whiteness were "ancient" and "African"........so maybe you should read more.

Greg

Please quote it along with the link you got it from. My guess is that by "ancient" they meant pre homo sapiens.

 

[Desperado]

Adam could not have been black. Ever try to take a rib away from a black man?

 

[IM2]

And surprisingly, some of the mutations responsible for lighter skin in Europeans turn out to have an ancient African origin.

And so as we pick through the "liberalism"---

"it is now found that for the majority of the time that humans have lived in Europe, the people had dark skin, and the genes signifying light skin only appear within the past 8,000 years. "

So we find that white skin is a mutation whereby the first mutation occurred in Africa. Then the "liberalism" shows us that blacks lived in Europe for the majority of time.

 

[IM2]

Adam could not have been black. Ever try to take a rib away from a black man?

Have you ever tried taking one away from a white one?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Adam could not have been black. Ever try to take a rib away from a black man?

Have you ever tried taking one away from a white one?

You're not wrong. Someone tries to take my ribs away, I'ma bite 'em. Good stuff.

 

[Asclepias]

And surprisingly, some of the mutations responsible for lighter skin in Europeans turn out to have an ancient African origin.

And so as we pick through the "liberalism"---

"it is now found that for the majority of the time that humans have lived in Europe, the people had dark skin, and the genes signifying light skin only appear within the past 8,000 years. "

So we find that white skin is a mutation whereby the first mutation occurred in Africa. Then the "liberalism" shows us that blacks lived in Europe for the majority of time.

Makes you wonder sometime dont it? The mutations that are responsible for light skin dont appear in europe until about 8k years ago and its liberalisms fault. SMDH

 

[IM2]

Adam could not have been black. Ever try to take a rib away from a black man?

Have you ever tried taking one away from a white one?

You're not wrong. Someone tries to take my ribs away, I'ma bite 'em. Good stuff.

It's safe to say that the love of ribs is colorblind.

I think desperado got it wrong. The reason men like women so much is because they come from ribs.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Adam could not have been black. Ever try to take a rib away from a black man?

Have you ever tried taking one away from a white one?

You're not wrong. Someone tries to take my ribs away, I'ma bite 'em. Good stuff.

It's safe to say that the love of ribs is colorblind.

I think desperado got it wrong. The reason men like women so much is because they come from ribs.

Well, I'm not a man, so I can't say for certain, but I'm guessing there's a bit more to it than that.

Probably doesn't hurt, though.

 

[Asclepias]

Adam could not have been black. Ever try to take a rib away from a black man?

Most Black men prefer women over ribs. Just sayin.

 

[Asclepias]

Show us where in the bible the Hebrews were clearly identified as "not Black". Please link to your sources.

"Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses regarding the Cushite woman he had married, for he had married a Cushite woman." - Bamidbar Chapter 12

Yeah, that doesn't say a damned thing about anyone being black or not-black. That would be about "Jew" and "not-Jew".

Moses was a Hebrew man from the tribe of Levi.
Earliest self identification of Israelite tribes as collectively Jews, is in the Megilat Ester.

Long jump outside the five books.

Moses was another Black guy that god turned white so the Hebrews would believe he had actually spoken with god. Matter of fact that was supposed to be more of a miracle than turning a staff into a snake.