Why is the news reporting aobut this "deadly shooting"

While the murder of anyone is always bad, this incident shows how all the gun control in the world doesn't ultimately matter since shotguns are almost never addressed. The incident would have still happened even if handguns and assault weapons had been banned or otherwise unavailable.

Plus, CNN at least is finally addressing these incidents not as a gun-control issue, but a mental health and general indifference to human life issue. Think when videogames are creating 'murder simulators' as "entertainment" (and famously the US Army used one such FPS as such) we're conditioning our young that guns and murder is a valid option for resolving disputes.

While it's true other countries without gun violence problems have the same content and thus the games aren't solely to blame, in a society with both easy gun availability AND 'murder porn entertainment' it's worth addressing if better forms of recreation and entertainment would be worth pursueing. Game/Movie ratings don't prevent underaged kids from viewing or obtaining them so shouldn't be relied upon to control access. A government mandate forbidding such things would however. And though the anti-censorship crowd would go indiscriminantly nuts, we have to ask ourselves if loosing graphic violence as "entertainment" is really so bad.
 
Last edited:
But they neglected to report on any of the deadly shootings and drive bys in Chicago and Detroit in the past month?

Are the deaths of black people not worth reporting? Only two people were shot (three including the shooter), so wtf?

Funny, shootings in Chicago are all over the news.
 
But they neglected to report on any of the deadly shootings and drive bys in Chicago and Detroit in the past month?

Are the deaths of black people not worth reporting? Only two people were shot (three including the shooter), so wtf?

Funny, shootings in Chicago are all over the news.
Context: National news, carried by the national networks.
But then you knew that.
 
And according to the DoJ, over 2 million crimes were prevented in the same span of time by civilian firearms.

Link?

[MENTION=39768]hazlnut[/MENTION]

Get mad.

Department of Justice Statistics:
You are far more likely to survive
a violent assault if you defend yourself with a gun.

Resisting with a gun 6%
Did nothing at all 25%
Resisted with a knife 40%
Non-violent resistance 45%

U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Rape Victimization in 26 American Cities, 1979 60
Department of Justice's National Crime Victimization Survey 61
U.S. Department of Justice 62
U.S. Department of Justice 63
British Home Office – no a pro-gun organization by any mean

From these same studies.

Of the 2,500,000 annual self-defense cases using guns, more than 7.7% are by women
defending themselves against sexual abuse.
Fact:
When a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3% of the attempted rapes are
successful, compared to 32% when unarmed.

Fact:
The probability of serious injury from an attack is 2.5 times greater for women offering no
resistance than for women resisting with a gun. Men also benefit from using a gun, but the
benefits are smaller: offering no resistance is 1.4 times more likely to result in serious injury than
resisting with a gun.

Fact:
27% of women keep a gun in the house.

Fact:
37.6 million women either own or have rapid access to guns.

Fact:
In 1966 the city of Orlando responded to a wave of sexual assaults by offering firearms
training classes to women. The number of rapes dropped by nearly 90%.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/55878NCJRS.pdf
 
The lie that all recent mass shooters are registered Democrats has been debunked time and time again.

Adam Lanza's mother is a survivalist who was stock piling provisions and weapons because of the coming civil violence which right wingers believed would occur if Obama was re-elected.

One of the university shooters was in the US on a student visa and was a resident alien studying in the US.

Nodal Hassan, the Ft. Hood shooter was from West Virginia which doesn't register party affiliation so he couldn't be a registered.

James Holmes, the Colorado movie shooter had no political affiliation.
 
If obama had a son...................

article-baltimoreaddon5-0126.jpg
 
[MENTION=39768]hazlnut[/MENTION] Come on kid, you asked for the link, you got it, I can that your online from the bottom of screen, now come here and take your licks.

And according to the DoJ, over 2 million crimes were prevented in the same span of time by civilian firearms.

Link?

[MENTION=39768]hazlnut[/MENTION]

Get mad.

Department of Justice Statistics:
You are far more likely to survive
a violent assault if you defend yourself with a gun.

Resisting with a gun 6%
Did nothing at all 25%
Resisted with a knife 40%
Non-violent resistance 45%

U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Rape Victimization in 26 American Cities, 1979 60
Department of Justice's National Crime Victimization Survey 61
U.S. Department of Justice 62
U.S. Department of Justice 63
British Home Office – no a pro-gun organization by any mean

From these same studies.

Of the 2,500,000 annual self-defense cases using guns, more than 7.7% are by women
defending themselves against sexual abuse.
Fact:
When a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3% of the attempted rapes are
successful, compared to 32% when unarmed.

Fact:
The probability of serious injury from an attack is 2.5 times greater for women offering no
resistance than for women resisting with a gun. Men also benefit from using a gun, but the
benefits are smaller: offering no resistance is 1.4 times more likely to result in serious injury than
resisting with a gun.

Fact:
27% of women keep a gun in the house.

Fact:
37.6 million women either own or have rapid access to guns.

Fact:
In 1966 the city of Orlando responded to a wave of sexual assaults by offering firearms
training classes to women. The number of rapes dropped by nearly 90%.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/55878NCJRS.pdf
 
Dollar to a thousand stale donuts the shooter was either.......


1) A tea party guy

or

2) Ends up having an NRA Magazine subscription at home.

or

3) Attended a gun show recently


or

4) ALL OF THE ABOVE




It'll just be a coincidence as always with these mass shootings!!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::2up:

Uh, I think you are going to be very disappointed with your prediction.
 
The lie that all recent mass shooters are registered Democrats has been debunked time and time again.

Adam Lanza's mother

Stop right there.

We're talking about Adam Lanza, not his mother.

GTFO loon.

Adam Lanza wasn't a registered anything. They man had been under the treatment of psychiatrists for years.

Trying to pin mass shootings on Democrats is an epic fail. But there is ample evidence that a number of mass shootings which are politically motivated and carried out by white supremicists, and other right-wingers which you typically ignore and pretend don't exist.
 
Dollar to a thousand stale donuts the shooter was either.......


1) A tea party guy

or

2) Ends up having an NRA Magazine subscription at home.

or

3) Attended a gun show recently


or

4) ALL OF THE ABOVE




It'll just be a coincidence as always with these mass shootings!!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::2up:

Just proved how stupid you are.
 
This happened at a very public place - Columbia mall. It happened at the mall WHILE the mall was opened.

It is in a very good neighborhood, thus rather news-worthy compared to, say, Baltimore, where murders happen every week.

I believe that's the OPs point. Where murders happen every week, there are lots of guns and gun restrictions, it's not a story.

When a murder happens in a safe, white area, it's OMG, we have to care about shootings now!!!
 
By and large, the mainstream media only reports on crime which affects middle class white people. Anything that affects a poor neighborhood, is of little interest because you expect bad things to happen in poor neighborhoods.
 
[MENTION=39768]hazlnut[/MENTION] Come on kid, you asked for the link, you got it, I can that your online from the bottom of screen, now come here and take your licks.

And according to the DoJ, over 2 million crimes were prevented in the same span of time by civilian firearms.

Link?

[MENTION=39768]hazlnut[/MENTION]

Get mad.

Department of Justice Statistics:
You are far more likely to survive
a violent assault if you defend yourself with a gun.

Resisting with a gun 6%
Did nothing at all 25%
Resisted with a knife 40%
Non-violent resistance 45%

U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Rape Victimization in 26 American Cities, 1979 60
Department of Justice's National Crime Victimization Survey 61
U.S. Department of Justice 62
U.S. Department of Justice 63
British Home Office – no a pro-gun organization by any mean

From these same studies.

Of the 2,500,000 annual self-defense cases using guns, more than 7.7% are by women
defending themselves against sexual abuse.
Fact:
When a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3% of the attempted rapes are
successful, compared to 32% when unarmed.

Fact:
The probability of serious injury from an attack is 2.5 times greater for women offering no
resistance than for women resisting with a gun. Men also benefit from using a gun, but the
benefits are smaller: offering no resistance is 1.4 times more likely to result in serious injury than
resisting with a gun.

Fact:
27% of women keep a gun in the house.

Fact:
37.6 million women either own or have rapid access to guns.

Fact:
In 1966 the city of Orlando responded to a wave of sexual assaults by offering firearms
training classes to women. The number of rapes dropped by nearly 90%.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/55878NCJRS.pdf


The source sited doesn't even come close to backing up your claims.

Nice try.

Do you even know you're lying?
 

Forum List

Back
Top