Prostitution is not synonymous with road construction. It's the practice or occupation of engaging in sexual activity with someone for payment. Per its other definition, it's the unworthy or corrupt use of one's talents for the sake of personal or financial gain. Therefore, it cannot be argued that everything you do with your body is prostitution. To argue otherwise is to, for example, say that working as a soldier, a doctor, a nurse, and an EMT is that same as being a prostitute.
1) it's the unworthy or corrupt use of one's talents? says who?
2) and if one's talents happen to be in the sexual sphere why not use them the sake of personal or financial gain?
1) Google
2) Well, that depends. Where do you stand on the moral spectrum? Once that's known, we can bridge from there.
It's not an issue of where one stands on a moral spectrum that has yet to be identified. It is about definitions ..
- the practice or occupation of engaging in sexual activity with someone for payment.
- the unworthy or corrupt use of one's talents for the sake of personal or financial gain.
Dante of course came at it without a moral crusade. To suggest everyone involved in prostitution is in it for the same group of reasons that would outrage most people, moralists or not, is to defy the realities of sexuality. There are people who view sex differently than either you or I. Their views are not any less or more moral to me
If you want to mix in ethics, we have a whole nother conversation
Personally I feel prostitution is degradation. It affects both men and women, but the majority are women. Many of these women are desperate. They turn to this 'profession' out of desperation.
What about the women who are not desperate? What about people who do not feel sex is degradation? What about people who feel what and how and when they have sex is none of yours or mine business?
Those I feel really are valid questions and, if there are answers to them, it's really freaking complicated. Uhm... I could try to answer them, but it's really just a matter of opinion and, with respect to you, both of our opinions are not the same. That, in itself, is neither a good or bad thing. It makes us people with our own unique collection of viewpoints.
Uhm... What about the women who are not desperate. Uhm, hm... It still feels wrong. Personally it feels like a woman is still being treated like a piece of meat, degraded repeatedly [fucked], for money. It is the carnal men with lust in their hearts who pay money so they can get into a woman's vagina, because he has neither love nor courage to befriend and fall in love with a woman like normal men usually can. This lust, the twisted sister of love, is behind this dehumanization. Again... that's just my personal view of it, and I'm being honest with you, and I'm not pretending that my view is the only view that is correct. All I can do is speak for myself while respecting those who see things a little differently.
On the second question... I don't think sex in and of itself is degradation... And I don't think I argued that, either... It is the selling of your body for money to be gripped and treated like a piece of meat out of nothing but carnal lust, not love, that I personally feel is degrading.
In spite of people who feel differently, or feel it is none of my business, I don't think it really, matters, honestly. I will hold true to my convictions; those with a difference of opinion will not change theirs simply because of my opinion, and so I and everyone else with a similar view to mine will not change theirs simply because the other people have a difference of opinion. I think that's what makes honest communication great: we have these differences of opinion, and we have respect, and we can get to know one another better while treating each other well. Also, it'd be really boring if we all had the same set of opinions. Seriously.