Why is DNC Establishment Trying to Stop Bernie? He has Same Beliefs as Obama

[gipper]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

 

[SweetTea]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

 

[pknopp]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.

 

[SweetTea]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.

So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.

BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.

 

[gipper]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.

 

[22lcidw]

Democrats are for communism,, but they have to sneak to that point.. they haven’t passed enough liberty stripping laws to fully enforce communism.

cities like Boston Baltimore Chicago Detroit Are communist like..

You got it wrong.

Trumpers are for fascism. They don't even try to hide it

Progs are for communism and fascism. Its been their show for 50 years or so. Repubs are not innocent. However Progs do not seem to remove any laws and rules and departments that are deemed communist and fascist. They even add to it.

 

[pknopp]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.

So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.

BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.

$1 million for me, $1 dollar for you. No, I do not think that is a good thing.

 

[SweetTea]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.

A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Barrack Hussein Obama and Bernie Sanders have the same socialist, far left, political beliefs. What is DNC trying to torpedo "The Bern" in favor of Biden?
Obama spearheads campaign against Sanders’ nomination as Democratic presidential candidate
Only thing I can think of is that Sanders is not corrupt enough for them.

It's so simple: they only support people they videotaped ******* little kids. That's why Tulsi and Bernie are pariahs in the Stalinist democrat Party.

They cannot be trusted to follow orders to the letter

 

[gipper]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.

A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.

BS. Stop believing propaganda.

 

[SweetTea]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.

So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.

BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.

$1 million for me, $1 dollar for you. No, I do not think that is a good thing.

Again, this is simply envy in full force. You can't successfully make the "rich" much less rich and at the same time help all the poor. That is a house of cards, not to mention, stealing. The progressive tax system already has a Robin Hood component, but that can only go so far before the "rich" run out of money.

 

[pknopp]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.

A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.

No, they are not.

 

[SweetTea]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.

A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.

BS. Stop believing propaganda.

Simple facts. The numbers don't lie.

 

[SweetTea]

Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.

A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.

No, they are not.

They are earning more money. They may not be getting richer depending on how they choose to spend that extra money. There is an element of personal responsibility in play. I know mentioning PR is a big no no for most Democrats/liberals.

 

[pknopp]

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.

So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.

BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.

$1 million for me, $1 dollar for you. No, I do not think that is a good thing.

Again, this is simply envy in full force. You can't successfully make the "rich" much less rich and at the same time help all the poor. That is a house of cards, not to mention, stealing. The progressive tax system already has a Robin Hood component, but that can only go so far before the "rich" run out of money.

We hammer those who saved to pump up the markets. That is stealing. That is making those who saved their entire lives poorer. Largely the retired.

We make the elderly eat dog food so others can afford their third house.

 

[pknopp]

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.

A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.

No, they are not.

They are earning more money. They may not be getting richer depending on how they choose to spend that extra money. There is an element of personal responsibility in play. I know mentioning PR is a big no no for most Democrats/liberals.

They have to spend it on higher rent. Increased automobile costs. Increased food costs. They are at best treading water.

 

[SweetTea]

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.

A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.

No, they are not.

They are earning more money. They may not be getting richer depending on how they choose to spend that extra money. There is an element of personal responsibility in play. I know mentioning PR is a big no no for most Democrats/liberals.

They have to spend it on higher rent. Increased automobile costs. Increased food costs. They are at best treading water.

Um, inflation is very low. Their taxes were lowered as well. Maybe you are referring to the costs in liberal runs states and cities?

 

[gipper]

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.

So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.

BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.

$1 million for me, $1 dollar for you. No, I do not think that is a good thing.

Again, this is simply envy in full force. You can't successfully make the "rich" much less rich and at the same time help all the poor. That is a house of cards, not to mention, stealing. The progressive tax system already has a Robin Hood component, but that can only go so far before the "rich" run out of money.

More bull shit. Envy my ass. I’m old. I got mine.

Unlike you I care about my fellow Americans, many of whom are struggling financially, while your beloved wealthy live the life of kings and queens.

 

[gipper]

Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.

A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.

BS. Stop believing propaganda.

Simple facts. The numbers don't lie.

WTF. Reagan started this bs of rising tide lifts all boats, only it hasn’t. Wake up. Income inequality has gone straight up since the 80s.

The establishment loves dupes like you, that are duped into going against your self interest.

 

[pknopp]

Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.

Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.

So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.

BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.

$1 million for me, $1 dollar for you. No, I do not think that is a good thing.

Again, this is simply envy in full force. You can't successfully make the "rich" much less rich and at the same time help all the poor. That is a house of cards, not to mention, stealing. The progressive tax system already has a Robin Hood component, but that can only go so far before the "rich" run out of money.

More bull shit. Envy my ass. I’m old. I got mine.

Unlike you I care about my fellow Americans, many of whom are struggling financially, while your beloved wealthy live the life of kings and queens.

What I find odd is how many with nothing support the policies that keeps the boot on their neck that keeps them down.