Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

[billyerock1991]

Lying under oath is perjury. perjury is a crime. perjury by a president is an impeachable offence. The subject of the lie does not matter.

he was never convicted of lying under oath ... thats something your right wing nut jobs leaders want you to believe ... he settled out of court for giving misleading testimony, which iby the way sn't lying under oath... and it was a misdemeanor not a felony ... pull you head out of your ass and do some god damn research ...

He was impeached for lying under oath, that constitutes a conviction. He wasn't kicked out of office because the congress failed to get the votes for that.

Impeachment is the political equivalent of an indictment, you idiot.



Then it goes to trial in the Senate, where Clinton was acquitted of all charges.

There was no acquittal.
...

YEs.
There.
Was.



The Senate Acquits President Clinton - Washington Post
www.washingtonpost.com/.../clinton/.../impeach02...
The Washington Post
President Clinton speaks in the Rose Garden President Clinton speaks in the White House Rose Garden Friday after he was acquitted by the Senate in his ...
President Clinton acquitted - Feb 12, 1999 - HISTORY.com
www.history.com/this-day-in-history/president-clinton-acquitted
History
On February 12, 1999, the five-week impeachment trial of Bill Clinton comes to an end, with the Senate voting to acquit the president on both articles of impeachment: perjury and obstruction of justice. ... On August 6, Lewinsky appeared before the grand jury to begin her testimony ...
CLINTON ACQUITTED DECISIVELY - The New York Times
www.nytimes.com/.../president-s-acquittal-overview-c...
The New York Times
Feb 13, 1999 - WASHINGTON, Feb. 12— The Senate today acquitted President Clinton on two articles of impeachment, falling short of even a majority vote on either of the charges against him: perjury and obstruction of justice. ... ''Is respondent William Jefferson Clinton guilty or not guilty ...

Oh how they try to push that out of their minds

 

[Weatherman2020]

Bill was a frequent guest of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who flew the former President on "Lolita One" at least 11 times to the island resort where he kept "slaves", and that a procurer of underage girls was among the guests Bill invited to Chelsea's wedding.

 

[Redfish]

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

There's a difference between drug/rapist and typical hound dog. Bill's a hound dog. Or he was. Might be a bit old for that now. Deflecting Trump's sexist comments by pointing fingers at Bill doesn't work. First, Bill was busy doing the opposite of insulting the ladies, and Second, Bill's behavior has very little to do with Hillary being POTUS. She didn't divorce him because she loved the power too much, but I think she did kick him out of her bed for quite some time--they lived separately for awhile, after they left the White House. Comparing Bill Clinton to either Bill Cosby or Donald Trump is CRAZY, imo.

why would any normal male, or female, want to share Hillary's bed?

she has a vigina???

I have no interest in knowing.

 

[billyerock1991]

And the more they impeached, the higher his approval rating went -- because the country knew it was trumped up, republican bullshittery.

Lying under oath is perjury. perjury is a crime. perjury by a president is an impeachable offence. The subject of the lie does not matter.

he was never convicted of lying under oath ... thats something your right wing nut jobs leaders want you to believe ... he settled out of court for giving misleading testimony, which iby the way sn't lying under oath... and it was a misdemeanor not a felony ... pull you head out of your ass and do some god damn research ...

He was impeached for lying under oath, that constitutes a conviction. He wasn't kicked out of office because the congress failed to get the votes for that.

he was acquitted by the senate ... who by the way has the final say ... the house is like a grand jury ... saying you can take them to court ... the senate is the court who acquitted him ... no mater how hard you want to push it, after all is said and done, he was never convicted of lying under oath... but you keep trying ...

He was NOT acquitted, he was impeached but the senate did not vote to remove him from office. That is NOT an acquittal.

seems you're stuck in the stupid mode

 

[Redfish]

Lying under oath is perjury. perjury is a crime. perjury by a president is an impeachable offence. The subject of the lie does not matter.

he was never convicted of lying under oath ... thats something your right wing nut jobs leaders want you to believe ... he settled out of court for giving misleading testimony, which iby the way sn't lying under oath... and it was a misdemeanor not a felony ... pull you head out of your ass and do some god damn research ...

He was impeached for lying under oath, that constitutes a conviction. He wasn't kicked out of office because the congress failed to get the votes for that.

he was acquitted by the senate ... who by the way has the final say ... the house is like a grand jury ... saying you can take them to court ... the senate is the court who acquitted him ... no mater how hard you want to push it, after all is said and done, he was never convicted of lying under oath... but you keep trying ...

He was NOT acquitted, he was impeached but the senate did not vote to remove him from office. That is NOT an acquittal.

seems you're stuck in the stupid mode

No, that would be you. The house impeached him, the senate was controlled by dems who refused to remove him from office. That was not an acquittal.

 

[billyerock1991]

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

There's a difference between drug/rapist and typical hound dog. Bill's a hound dog. Or he was. Might be a bit old for that now. Deflecting Trump's sexist comments by pointing fingers at Bill doesn't work. First, Bill was busy doing the opposite of insulting the ladies, and Second, Bill's behavior has very little to do with Hillary being POTUS. She didn't divorce him because she loved the power too much, but I think she did kick him out of her bed for quite some time--they lived separately for awhile, after they left the White House. Comparing Bill Clinton to either Bill Cosby or Donald Trump is CRAZY, imo.

why would any normal male, or female, want to share Hillary's bed?

she has a vigina???

I have no interest in knowing.

well that's just you.... some guys will poke anything, you not so much... did you see schwarzenegger maid??? case closed

 

[billyerock1991]

And the more they impeached, the higher his approval rating went -- because the country knew it was trumped up, republican bullshittery.

Lying under oath is perjury. perjury is a crime. perjury by a president is an impeachable offence. The subject of the lie does not matter.

he was never convicted of lying under oath ... thats something your right wing nut jobs leaders want you to believe ... he settled out of court for giving misleading testimony, which iby the way sn't lying under oath... and it was a misdemeanor not a felony ... pull you head out of your ass and do some god damn research ...

He was impeached for lying under oath, that constitutes a conviction. He wasn't kicked out of office because the congress failed to get the votes for that.

Impeachment is the political equivalent of an indictment, you idiot.



Then it goes to trial in the Senate, where Clinton was acquitted of all charges.

There was no acquittal. The Senate just did not reach the 2/3d majority to impeach him. He was later found guilty of lying in FEDERAL COURT AND DISBARRED!!!!!

no he was never convected in federal court for lying ... I challenge you to prove that false accusation if you can

heres how it ended
On November 13, 1998, Clinton settled with Jones for $850,000, the entire amount of her claim, but without an apology, in exchange for her agreement to drop the appeal. Robert S. Bennett, Clinton's attorney, still maintained that Jones's claim was baseless and that Clinton only settled so he could end the lawsuit and move on with his life. In March 1999, Judge Wright ruled that Jones would only get $200,000 from the settlement and that the rest of the money would pay for her legal expenses.

Before the end of the entire litigation, her marriage broke apart. She also appeared in the news media to show the results of a makeover by Daniel C. DiCriscio and a nose job paid for by a donor.

In April 1999, Judge Wright found Clinton in civil contempt of court for misleading testimony in the Jones case. She ordered Clinton to pay $1,202 to the court and an additional $90,000 to Jones's lawyers for expenses incurred, far less than the $496,000 that the lawyers originally requested. so please show us where he was convicted of lying under oath

 

[waltky]

Stephanie wroted: Clinton wasn't successful.

Uncle Ferd says, "Well...

... he was successful at gettin' womens...

... like Miss Monica an' Miss Paula...

... dat's successful `nuff fer Uncle Ferd."

 

[billyerock1991]

he was never convicted of lying under oath ... thats something your right wing nut jobs leaders want you to believe ... he settled out of court for giving misleading testimony, which iby the way sn't lying under oath... and it was a misdemeanor not a felony ... pull you head out of your ass and do some god damn research ...

He was impeached for lying under oath, that constitutes a conviction. He wasn't kicked out of office because the congress failed to get the votes for that.

he was acquitted by the senate ... who by the way has the final say ... the house is like a grand jury ... saying you can take them to court ... the senate is the court who acquitted him ... no mater how hard you want to push it, after all is said and done, he was never convicted of lying under oath... but you keep trying ...

He was NOT acquitted, he was impeached but the senate did not vote to remove him from office. That is NOT an acquittal.

seems you're stuck in the stupid mode

No, that would be you. The house impeached him, the senate was controlled by dems who refused to remove him from office. That was not an acquittal.

the senate republicans had the majority

Class 3 (34 of the 100) seats in the United States Senate
51 seats needed for a majority
Majority party Minority party

Leader Trent Lott Tom Daschle
Party Republican Democratic
Leader's seat Mississippi South Dakota
Last election 55 seats republican 45 seats democtats
Seats won 55
do you ever do any research at all???
like I said you're stuck in the stupid mode

 

[Camp]

Stephanie wroted: Clinton wasn't successful.

Uncle Ferd says, "Well...

... he was successful at gettin' womens...

... like Miss Monica an' Miss Paula...

... dat's successful `nuff fer Uncle Ferd."

What the Clinton haters have never understood is that at the time this was in the news and taking place, a large percentage of men asked themselves whether they would have denied a groupies sexual favors if they were powerful, rich or a celebrity worthy of having females chasing after them.

 

[waltky]

Uncle Ferd says he would...

... no matter if she's rich...

... powerful, famous - or not.

 

[billyerock1991]

I'll take a guess and say that while Clinton is lech of the first order I don't think he ever drugged women

Yeah, because "you ought to put some ice on that," is sooooooooooooo much better.

The War on Women: Juanita Broaddrick and Bill Clinton - Breitbart

No it's that drugging women is so much worse than that

Biting a woman's lip through to force her to be raped is better??????????????

Is that your position?

I'm not defending clinton but
I don't assume a woman that cries rape is automatically telling the truth

No charges were ever filed that's all I know

As with Cosby and others, Clinton had several women come forward and that is what disturbing. One, two maybe...but when it gets more than that...where there is smoke, there is fire. I don't think they all lied. They just didn't have proof and as with any rape, it is one word against another.

heres where you have a problem bill cosby is being accused of rape ... bill clinton was accused of having and affairs and sexual harassment by paula jones he was never charged with a rape of any kind do some damn research for once in your life

 

[LeftofLeft]

If they can bring up charges from something that happened years ago. People shouldn't be cheering something like this. it could be YOU NEXT THEY DO it do.

and you're right. why isn't Billy Hounddog Clinton being brought up on the charges that were brought against him by a bunch of women?

Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars sniffing Clinton's underwear. And all he could come up with that he could prove is that Clinton got oral gratification from a woman who wanted to do so.

......you left out the obstruction of justice charge which is what he went after. The oral gratification was just a side show. The sad thing is that Clinton was so popular and approved, the majority would not have given two shits if he got some action after hours. By his own words, it was the cover-up that pissed off America. You Clinton lapdogs just like to hide behind the stained blue dress because you can't defend the obstruction of justice charge.

 

[Camp]

Yeah, because "you ought to put some ice on that," is sooooooooooooo much better.

The War on Women: Juanita Broaddrick and Bill Clinton - Breitbart

No it's that drugging women is so much worse than that

Biting a woman's lip through to force her to be raped is better??????????????

Is that your position?

I'm not defending clinton but
I don't assume a woman that cries rape is automatically telling the truth

No charges were ever filed that's all I know

As with Cosby and others, Clinton had several women come forward and that is what disturbing. One, two maybe...but when it gets more than that...where there is smoke, there is fire. I don't think they all lied. They just didn't have proof and as with any rape, it is one word against another.

heres where you have a problem bill cosby is being accused of rape ... bill clinton was accused of having and affairs and sexual harassment by paula jones he was never charged with a rape of any kind do some damn research for once in your life

These haters don't care about truth. They are Trump cultist and perfectly willing to repeat his lies and even make up new ones.

 

[OldLady]

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

There's a difference between drug/rapist and typical hound dog. Bill's a hound dog. Or he was. Might be a bit old for that now. Deflecting Trump's sexist comments by pointing fingers at Bill doesn't work. First, Bill was busy doing the opposite of insulting the ladies, and Second, Bill's behavior has very little to do with Hillary being POTUS. She didn't divorce him because she loved the power too much, but I think she did kick him out of her bed for quite some time--they lived separately for awhile, after they left the White House. Comparing Bill Clinton to either Bill Cosby or Donald Trump is CRAZY, imo.

No...he is not a "hound dog" he is a violent sexual predator. There is a long list of women he assaulted, and that list is just the ones who we know about.

Not buying it. And not buying whatever news outlet you found that in. He's a hound dog. So are a lot of guys. So what?

 

[Redfish]

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

There's a difference between drug/rapist and typical hound dog. Bill's a hound dog. Or he was. Might be a bit old for that now. Deflecting Trump's sexist comments by pointing fingers at Bill doesn't work. First, Bill was busy doing the opposite of insulting the ladies, and Second, Bill's behavior has very little to do with Hillary being POTUS. She didn't divorce him because she loved the power too much, but I think she did kick him out of her bed for quite some time--they lived separately for awhile, after they left the White House. Comparing Bill Clinton to either Bill Cosby or Donald Trump is CRAZY, imo.

why would any normal male, or female, want to share Hillary's bed?

she has a vigina???

I have no interest in knowing.

well that's just you.... some guys will poke anything, you not so much... did you see schwarzenegger maid??? case closed

can't say much for Arnold's taste in women. But the mental image of Hillary naked makes me want to vomit. Maybe we can ask Webb Hubbell about it, after all he is Chelsea's father. Oh, that's right, he's dead, just like Vince Foster and Ron Brown.

 

[Jarhead]

Lying under oath is perjury. perjury is a crime. perjury by a president is an impeachable offence. The subject of the lie does not matter.

he was never convicted of lying under oath ... thats something your right wing nut jobs leaders want you to believe ... he settled out of court for giving misleading testimony, which iby the way sn't lying under oath... and it was a misdemeanor not a felony ... pull you head out of your ass and do some god damn research ...

He was impeached for lying under oath, that constitutes a conviction. He wasn't kicked out of office because the congress failed to get the votes for that.

Impeachment is the political equivalent of an indictment, you idiot.



Then it goes to trial in the Senate, where Clinton was acquitted of all charges.

There was no acquittal. The Senate just did not reach the 2/3d majority to impeach him. He was later found guilty of lying in FEDERAL COURT AND DISBARRED!!!!!

no he was never convected in federal court for lying ... I challenge you to prove that false accusation if you can

heres how it ended
On November 13, 1998, Clinton settled with Jones for $850,000, the entire amount of her claim, but without an apology, in exchange for her agreement to drop the appeal. Robert S. Bennett, Clinton's attorney, still maintained that Jones's claim was baseless and that Clinton only settled so he could end the lawsuit and move on with his life. In March 1999, Judge Wright ruled that Jones would only get $200,000 from the settlement and that the rest of the money would pay for her legal expenses.

Before the end of the entire litigation, her marriage broke apart. She also appeared in the news media to show the results of a makeover by Daniel C. DiCriscio and a nose job paid for by a donor.

In April 1999, Judge Wright found Clinton in civil contempt of court for misleading testimony in the Jones case. She ordered Clinton to pay $1,202 to the court and an additional $90,000 to Jones's lawyers for expenses incurred, far less than the $496,000 that the lawyers originally requested. so please show us where he was convicted of lying under oath

under oath in front of congress he claimed to not have had sex with Monica Lewinsky. It was later proven that he did. He lied under oath. A democratic led congress opted to NOT have him brought up on charges of perjury in front of congress while under oath.

So, no, he was not convicted of a crime.....but it was proven that he committed one.

 

[Redfish]

He was impeached for lying under oath, that constitutes a conviction. He wasn't kicked out of office because the congress failed to get the votes for that.

he was acquitted by the senate ... who by the way has the final say ... the house is like a grand jury ... saying you can take them to court ... the senate is the court who acquitted him ... no mater how hard you want to push it, after all is said and done, he was never convicted of lying under oath... but you keep trying ...

He was NOT acquitted, he was impeached but the senate did not vote to remove him from office. That is NOT an acquittal.

seems you're stuck in the stupid mode

No, that would be you. The house impeached him, the senate was controlled by dems who refused to remove him from office. That was not an acquittal.

the senate republicans had the majority

Class 3 (34 of the 100) seats in the United States Senate
51 seats needed for a majority
Majority party Minority party

Leader Trent Lott Tom Daschle
Party Republican Democratic
Leader's seat Mississippi South Dakota
Last election 55 seats republican 45 seats democtats
Seats won 55
do you ever do any research at all???
like I said you're stuck in the stupid mode

I stand corrected, the republican controlled senate refused to remove Clinton from office after the house impeached him, happy now?

 

[Redfish]

Yeah, because "you ought to put some ice on that," is sooooooooooooo much better.

The War on Women: Juanita Broaddrick and Bill Clinton - Breitbart

No it's that drugging women is so much worse than that

Biting a woman's lip through to force her to be raped is better??????????????

Is that your position?

I'm not defending clinton but
I don't assume a woman that cries rape is automatically telling the truth

No charges were ever filed that's all I know

As with Cosby and others, Clinton had several women come forward and that is what disturbing. One, two maybe...but when it gets more than that...where there is smoke, there is fire. I don't think they all lied. They just didn't have proof and as with any rape, it is one word against another.

heres where you have a problem bill cosby is being accused of rape ... bill clinton was accused of having and affairs and sexual harassment by paula jones he was never charged with a rape of any kind do some damn research for once in your life

Juanita Broderick accused him of rape.

 

[billyerock1991]

If they can bring up charges from something that happened years ago. People shouldn't be cheering something like this. it could be YOU NEXT THEY DO it do.

and you're right. why isn't Billy Hounddog Clinton being brought up on the charges that were brought against him by a bunch of women?

Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars sniffing Clinton's underwear. And all he could come up with that he could prove is that Clinton got oral gratification from a woman who wanted to do so.

......you left out the obstruction of justice charge which is what he went after. The oral gratification was just a side show. The sad thing is that Clinton was so popular and approved, the majority would not have given two shits if he got some action after hours. By his own words, it was the cover-up that pissed off America. You Clinton lapdogs just like to hide behind the stained blue dress because you can't defend the obstruction of justice charge.

there was never a obstruction of justice charge ... clinton was clever yes, and was careful what he said ... the fact that most people aren't as intelligent as he is, theres that word again "is" oh how they forget but are quick to try something else... oh say like obstruction of justice ... well, thats a good one to try... but like everything they try they fail