Where's the compromise with gay marriage? Most conservatives dont want it, many liberals do, so we say ok Civil Unions are fine. THAT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!
I've even stated as much, that the gay community screwed up by pushing this issue instead of being happy with civil unions. No argument from me here.
Where's the compromise with abortion? Most conservatives don't want any, many liberals want it all, so we say ok, just no partial birth abortions OK? THAT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!
And I agree with this also, If you can't decide in the first two months then f*ck off, you waited too long and now you have to deal with the whole 9 months. No argument from me here either.
Where's the compromise with taxes? Everybody in this country pays too much taxes, but ok, the top 5% can have 50% of the tax share. THAT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!
I don't agree with that ideology either, no argument from me here.
Where's the compromise with helping the poor? Everyone wants to help the poor, and it turns out religious organizations are more effective and less expensive, so how about we give them some money too? NO!!
This one is obvious to counter. While it is indeed easier and cheaper to have religious organizations deal with the charity the drawback that many people deal with is that so called organization requires you to be a member before they will help you. In other words, catholic charities is not going to help you unless you're a catholic, and so on and so on.
Where's the compromise with multilateral action? Well we have about 60 allies at the moment. THAT'S NOT ENOUGH!!
I could be wrong but I think they were talking about security council support, not a hodgepodge of nations, but thats just my opinion on it.
Contemporary liberals aren't interested in compromise. They aren't even interested in the will of the people, which is why they place more faith in judicial decree than elected legislatures. They don't dare subject their desires to the whims of the population.
Didn't work that way for the cherokee, japanese, or arab americans at certain points in our history, did it? But that's not the main point of my argument here. Just like you don't like being lumped in with the 'chickenhawk' or 'neocon' or 'rabid rightwingnuts', neither do us 'contemporary libs' like being lumped in with the screwballs from the far left.
