Why Iowa?

I think Iowa goes first because imo if you gave every American a map of the states without names, Iowa would be the one that most often people couldn't name.
 
hellooo from the heart of America :thup:



Endorsement: Hillary Clinton has needed knowledge, experience
635881332213296706-clinton8.jpg

Endorsement: Hillary Clinton has needed knowledge, experience
 
People in Iowa aren't immune to 'leftitis' any more than people in other states. Traditionally, Iowans were all about hard work. Liberals are experts at turning people off work and onto government subsidies. They know how to turn self-sufficiency into hopeless dependence.

The liberals have been working for decades to get to this point. They have done nothing but lure peope into government programs so they could slowly grow dependent on them. Now they threaten to pull the rug out from under them if they don't support their masters. All by design.

Many Iowans have escaped the disease called liberalism, but I admit it's spreading. I get nervous when I hear young people say they like Bernie Sanders. Truth is that they don't understand or care about most of his ideas. They didn't hear much about he said 'free college education.' And they are under the false assumption that some super rich people will pay for it and it won't negatively affect them or anyone they know.

Liberals know that promising to give people, free of charge, the things they want the most is the best way to win them over. While some are excited about free school, others are excited about expanded welfare, free internet (which means free computer) and other freebies. I think some actually believed that Obama would buy them a new house, pay their bills and hand them more stuff. Bernie is just picking up where Obama left off, but since he is an admitted socialist, people believe he'll actually deliver the freebies.
 
Why the Iowa hate?
No hate; just tired of hearing that sucking up to a religious group is essential in a nation of religious freedom.


America is 80% Christian.


If you don't like the idea that Christians get input in the political process your problem is that you live in a democratic nation and you don't like democracy.

Not Iowa.
Strawman...allowing a religious group to determine legislation is dangerous at best.
Wait until we have a significant Islamic population and you'll shit in your pants.
 
Why the Iowa hate?
No hate; just tired of hearing that sucking up to a religious group is essential in a nation of religious freedom.


America is 80% Christian.


If you don't like the idea that Christians get input in the political process your problem is that you live in a democratic nation and you don't like democracy.

Not Iowa.
Strawman...allowing a religious group to determine legislation is dangerous at best.
Wait until we have a significant Islamic population and you'll shit in your pants.


"A religious group"?

NOt sure what you mean. That vast majority of the American population is Christian.

You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in any form of democracy.

And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.

HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
 
Why the Iowa hate?
No hate; just tired of hearing that sucking up to a religious group is essential in a nation of religious freedom.


America is 80% Christian.


If you don't like the idea that Christians get input in the political process your problem is that you live in a democratic nation and you don't like democracy.

Not Iowa.
Strawman...allowing a religious group to determine legislation is dangerous at best.
Wait until we have a significant Islamic population and you'll shit in your pants.


"A religious group"?

NOt sure what you mean. That vast majority of the American population is Christian.

You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in any form of democracy.

And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.

HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
We don't have a Democracy, we have a correct Representative Republic.
 
Why the Iowa hate?
No hate; just tired of hearing that sucking up to a religious group is essential in a nation of religious freedom.


America is 80% Christian.


If you don't like the idea that Christians get input in the political process your problem is that you live in a democratic nation and you don't like democracy.

Not Iowa.
Strawman...allowing a religious group to determine legislation is dangerous at best.
Wait until we have a significant Islamic population and you'll shit in your pants.


"A religious group"?

NOt sure what you mean. That vast majority of the American population is Christian.

You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in any form of democracy.

And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.

HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
We don't have a Democracy, we have a correct Representative Republic.


With many democratic features including democratic election of all our legislators and Presidents.

YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.


That vast majority of the American population is Christian.

You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.

And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.

HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
 
No hate; just tired of hearing that sucking up to a religious group is essential in a nation of religious freedom.


America is 80% Christian.


If you don't like the idea that Christians get input in the political process your problem is that you live in a democratic nation and you don't like democracy.

Not Iowa.
Strawman...allowing a religious group to determine legislation is dangerous at best.
Wait until we have a significant Islamic population and you'll shit in your pants.


"A religious group"?

NOt sure what you mean. That vast majority of the American population is Christian.

You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in any form of democracy.

And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.

HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
We don't have a Democracy, we have a correct Representative Republic.


With many democratic features including democratic election of all our legislators and Presidents.

YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.


That vast majority of the American population is Christian.

You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.

And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.

HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
The Electoral Vote is not one person, one vote.
Only Propositions are Democratic and they are written by committee.
 

Forum List

Back
Top