Why I Trust NASA on Man-made Climate Change

[CrusaderFrank]

No NASA proved it's man made. We're doing this to ourselves. Wake up before its too late. Like on Krypton. And when the end of days comes you still won't admit you were wrong. You'll say it was gods will. Which is proof, you aren't basing your opinions on logic or facts. It's your stupidity/religion.

 

[sealybobo]

View attachment 990460

Hey, I don't believe we landed on the moon. But I believe in Global Warming. You're the opposite.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Hey, I don't believe we landed on the moon. But I believe in Global Warming. You're the opposite.

I believe in neither at this point.

Why did NASA scrub ALL RECORDS of the Apollo missions?

I think we orbited around the Moon and Kubrick did the rest

 

[Dante]

Please explain to me how it is that temperatures increase and decrease by 50 to 70 degrees twice a year every year for the past 4 billion years, but an imaginary 1.5 increase over 150 years will end all life on Earth

and what does have to do with what NASA says the science says?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

and what does have to do with what NASA says the science says?

Is NASA the Messiah? Moshiach?

They don’t pronounce evidence, they have to produce it

 

[Dante]

Is NASA the Messiah? Moshiach?

They don’t pronounce evidence, they have to produce it

NASA is not an ideological or political entity.

You're more confused than I remember, Frank. I guess it's...

Old age. You too are qualified to be a nominee

 

[ding]

It's funny people who believe we landed on the moon now think NASA is lying about climate change.

Or believe they have mistaken a natural warming trend for AGW.

 

[ding]

Hey, I don't believe we landed on the moon. But I believe in Global Warming. You're the opposite.

You do realize the planet is in an interglacial period that is still 2C cooler than the previous interglacial period with 26ft shallower seas than the previous interglacial period with 120 ppm more atmospheric CO2 than the previous interglacial period, right?

I mean you do know those things, right? You can look them up, right?

 

[Stryder50]

You do realize the planet is in an interglacial period that is still 2C cooler than the previous interglacial period with 26ft shallower seas than the previous interglacial period with 120 ppm more atmospheric CO2 than the previous interglacial period, right?

I mean you do know those things, right? You can look them up, right?

Why should they learn any science when they have paid government "experts" to tell them what to know and what to do?

If those experts told them that mixing bleach and ammonia together produces a great cleaning solution, they'd believe it and do it.

We see how they have all practiced what they preach and stopped personally exhaling carbon dioxide to help bring down those dangerous CO2 levels. One part CO2 out of 2,500 parts of atmosphere is too much and killing Earth. We need to get it down to one part per 5,000. Earth doesn't need all those green plants anyway.

 

[sealybobo]

Or believe they have mistaken a natural warming trend for AGW.

They they are mistaken. I should instead believe you and Shell Oil.

Idiot!

 

[ding]

They they are mistaken. I should instead believe you and Shell Oil.

Idiot!

You should believe the geologic record, dummy.

 

[sealybobo]

You should believe the geologic record, dummy.

Why? NASA doesn't.

 

[MisterBeale]

You should believe the geologic record, dummy.

I'm sure we can figure this out. . . if we just um. . . "work together?"

 

[Stryder50]

Why? NASA doesn't.

NASA is not a monolithic, lockstep, mob.

If you were to know the aerospace industry you'd know that what the administrative (and appointed) leadership decides is policy, either due to their personal beliefs and ideology or as told by those who hired them and pay their salary, often doesn't match the lower rank and file who actually do the work.

You'd also understand about selective data and it's interpretation and use.

You might also know that often "consensus" is by a slight majority over a minority view/interpretation.

If you had reasonable knowledge and knew history, you'd know that majority often are not correct.

Obviously you need to mix bleach and ammonia next time you clean your bathroom.

 

[ReinyDays]

No NASA proved it's man made.

I'd like to see this proof ... a link is fine ... it should include an experiment, not just statistics ... I can make statistics say anything I want them to say, so that's not proof ... maybe it's evidence, but it's not proof ...

You said NASA proved this ... so where is that proof and the robust mathematics all proofs must have? ...

 

[sealybobo]

NASA is not a monolithic, lockstep, mob.

If you were to know the aerospace industry you'd know that what the administrative (and appointed) leadership decides is policy, either due to their personal beliefs and ideology or as told by those who hired them and pay their salary, often doesn't match the lower rank and file who actually do the work.

You'd also understand about selective data and it's interpretation and use.

You might also know that often "consensus" is by a slight majority over a minority view/interpretation.

If you had reasonable knowledge and knew history, you'd know that majority often are not correct.

Obviously you need to mix bleach and ammonia next time you clean your bathroom.

I know who's lying about Man Made Climate Change.

a. The biggest global pollutors
b. Lobbyists who pay Republicans to deny
c. The corporate media who doesn't call out these Republicans. It should be obvious to all. Liberal media my ass. Same liberal media that didn't tell us Bush lied us into Iraq. Hell, even trump admitted it. So Trump is more liberal than MSNBC.

When I mix bleach and ammonia maybe I'll inject it into the body and cure myself like Trump suggested.

The same liars who for YEARS paid Republicans to say cigarettes did not cause cancer and lead pipes and gasoline were perfectly fine. Wake up dummy.

 

[Stryder50]

I'm sure we can figure this out. . . if we just um. . . "work together?"


View attachment 991507

More pseudo-liberal, leftist mush for brains doublespeak!

There is no "global climate crisis"!
"Never let a crisis go to waste" - remember who is well know for saying that ?

There is no need for urgent action, other than to remove lying idiots like her from positions of authority and power..

 

[Stryder50]

I know who's lying about Man Made Climate Change.

a. The biggest global pollutors
b. Lobbyists who pay Republicans to deny
c. The corporate media who doesn't call out these Republicans. It should be obvious to all. Liberal media my ass. Same liberal media that didn't tell us Bush lied us into Iraq. Hell, even trump admitted it. So Trump is more liberal than MSNBC.

When I mix bleach and ammonia maybe I'll inject it into the body and cure myself like Trump suggested.

The same liars who for YEARS paid Republicans to say cigarettes did not cause cancer and lead pipes and gasoline were perfectly fine. Wake up dummy.

Typical leftist bullshyte there, Komrade.

How about "walking he walk" that match the "talk you talk"?!

Start by removing from you life everything that involves the use of petroleum;
Anything 'plastic'; - artificial leather, synthetic fabrics, the vinyl and fiberglass- such as most of the components in your automobile and it's tires,
Don't travel on roads that have asphalt,
Most of the furniture in you home and the materials used to build it,
Don't use any of your electronics,
Don't buy and consume most of the food at your grocery store - petroleum used to grow, harvest, process, and bring to market the products of farming,
Don't travel by air, rail or anything other by barefoot (and naked),
Don't use most modern medicines,

I could fill pages if I had time and inclination.
Point is that petroleum and natural gas(vinyl is made from it) as carbon resources - more accurate term than "fossil fuel" - are in every aspect of modern living and the only way to be free of it's use in your life would be to go barefoot naked into the wilderness and grub for your food.

But, like too many of your fellow idiots, you are too dumb, ignorant, stupid, dishonest, and clueless of what you are talking about. Which makes you and your phony sort a far greater danger to humanity and the planet than use of carbon resources.

First major sign of many such was lack of chemistry knowledge in your post.

I could address your other fallacies, lies, and distortions, but haven't time at the moment.

If you had a brain, you might be a benefit to humanity instead of another waste of skin.

 

[MisterBeale]

More pseudo-liberal, leftist mush for brains doublespeak!

There is no "global climate crisis"!
"Never let a crisis go to waste" - remember who is well know for saying that ?

There is no need for urgent action, other than to remove lying idiots like her from positions of authority and power..

What boggles my mind, is how they will believe ANYTHING the propaganda tell them, no matter how absolutely insane.

I mean, look at this;

A volcano is erupting again in Iceland. Is climate change causing more eruptions?

Climate change is causing the widespread warming of our land, oceans and atmosphere. Apart from this, it also has the potential to increase volcanic activity, affect the size of eruptions, and alter the “cooling effect” that follows volcanic eruptions.

www.preventionweb.net

How climate change might trigger more earthquakes and volcanic eruptions

Climate change is causing increasingly severe weather – but it’s not just hazards at the Earth’s surface we should be concerned about.

theconversation.com

Scientists study likely link between climate and earthquakes

University of Miami marine geoscientists Falk Amelung and Guoqing Lin examine whether extreme weather from climate change can impact earthquakes and answer questions about the powerful temblor that hit Morocco on Sept. 8.

news.miami.edu

If an asteroid impacted the Earth and destroyed a city or three, I have no doubt, they would find some way to blame that on AGW too.

 

[sealybobo]

Typical leftist bullshyte there, Komrade.

How about "walking he walk" that match the "talk you talk"?!

Start by removing from you life everything that involves the use of petroleum;
Anything 'plastic'; - artificial leather, synthetic fabrics, the vinyl and fiberglass- such as most of the components in your automobile and it's tires,
Don't travel on roads that have asphalt,
Most of the furniture in you home and the materials used to build it,
Don't use any of your electronics,
Don't buy and consume most of the food at your grocery store - petroleum used to grow, harvest, process, and bring to market the products of farming,
Don't travel by air, rail or anything other by barefoot (and naked),
Don't use most modern medicines,

I could fill pages if I had time and inclination.
Point is that petroleum and natural gas(vinyl is made from it) as carbon resources - more accurate term than "fossil fuel" - are in every aspect of modern living and the only way to be free of it's use in your life would be to go barefoot naked into the wilderness and grub for your food.

But, like too many of your fellow idiots, you are too dumb, ignorant, stupid, dishonest, and clueless of what you are talking about. Which makes you and your phony sort a far greater danger to humanity and the planet than use of carbon resources.

First major sign of many such was lack of chemistry knowledge in your post.

I could address your other fallacies, lies, and distortions, but haven't time at the moment.

If you had a brain, you might be a benefit to humanity instead of another waste of skin.

OMG such horrible arguments. Of course we're all going to use gas where it's needed. But why not buy a Ecar if it makes sense for you? It might not make sense to you but I'd rather have 1 gas car and one Ecar on the road than 2 gas cars. You understand that logic? Going green is not a bad thing. It's truly amazing how Republicans have to take the opposite position no matter what if Democrats say go green Republicans have to say NO don't. It's, well, WEIRD.